A 25-year-old black man was shot dead in Georgia while jogging, prompting online protests labeling t

This has already been refuted by evidence.

 

No it hasn't, as you are perfectly aware. It's right in the report, that you didn't read.

 

Yes, he did. Your claims are false and have been refuted.

 

you have evidence the video was faked, and that mcmichaels lied to the police?

 

Prove it. Post it. This has already been refuted by evidence.

 

"...Several officers canvassed the neighborhood looking for the unknown male... I have also canvassed the neighborhood while on day shift where I spoke to many residents..."

 

You would have to show the video was faked, and mcmichaels lied to the police in order to refute it. The statutes are clear. McMichaels had zero authority to try and detain Arbery.

 

This has already been refuted.

 

already been refuted.

 

They ADMITTED they were attempting to detain him. lol

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ts-labeling-t.571873/page-196#post-1071709109

 

you would have to show the video was faked, and McMichaels lied to the police in order to refute it.

 

See, he was right and you wrong, you were refuted already.

 

so you didn't read the report, again. It's in crystal clear English. The description was black male, and the color of his sweatshirt. They could not identify Arbery as the person. It's why they are in jail.

 

Excellent. Glad you see why the comment is factually false

 

He was right, you were wrong. Refuted.

 

so you didn't read the report, again. It's in crystal clear English. The description was black male, and the color of his sweatshirt. They could not identify Arbery as the person. It's why they are in jail.

 

You pointed out him proving you wrong and you have been refuted.

 

so you didn't read the report, again. It's in crystal clear English. The description was black male, and the color of his sweatshirt. They could not identify Arbery as the person. It's why they are in jail.

It literally says this in the report. You would have to show that report was faked, in order to refute it.

 

fake news.

 

No. You hang them.

 

Of course you were as it's all you got and I have clearly told you I am fine with finding out who were the white people and sending over the police. So stop with that canard.

What chimney. The video shows him going around the back of the house then he is inside the house. Process of elimination and we know he did not go in the front as you are insinuating.

What you got better? Arbery had already threatened them in the past, had any white people? Arbery was fleeing the scene of his crime and ran by then, have any white people?

Based on the facts we have, you make them up.

It wasn't the front, process of elimination, prove he went in through the front.

Prove the McMichael's knew they were in the house when they were in the house and had the opportunity to do so

 

so you are asserting that the report was faked?

 

You have already been refuted.

 

So you can break into a house and if spotted and running away and someone tries to stop you you can legally assault them?