Legal Docs: St. Louis Prosecutor Tampered With Evidence In McCloskey Gun Case

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by ModCon, Jul 23, 2020.

  1. glitch

    glitch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2006
    Messages:
    13,607
    Likes Received:
    2,167
    Trophy Points:
    113
    AmericanNationalist, Dutch and ModCon like this.
  2. Doofenshmirtz

    Doofenshmirtz Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2016
    Messages:
    28,150
    Likes Received:
    19,390
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Easy to say from the safety and comfort of an armchair. If all you have is a non working gun, you play the hand you have. She needs a working firearm and some training. The rioters/trespassers need to be shown their boundaries. In the end, they didn't harm them or their dog.
     
    nra37922 likes this.
  3. glitch

    glitch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2006
    Messages:
    13,607
    Likes Received:
    2,167
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I would imagine it would keep the rabble away. Would you approach her with her waving that gun around like that? Seems like it served its intended purpose.
     
  4. mudman

    mudman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2013
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    4,189
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There's no way to know what kind of damage they saved themselves from and THAT....IS.....THE....POINT!!!! Do you get it?

    Al we know is that mob didn't do a damn thing to those people and given what's gone on and how many people have been attacked for no reason, it's reasonable to say the guns served their purpose.
     
    nra37922 and Labouroflove like this.
  5. Pants

    Pants Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2018
    Messages:
    12,899
    Likes Received:
    11,315
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    But there were other houses in that neighborhood. All I saw was people on the streets and sidewalks. Were other houses in that community damaged?
     
  6. Pred

    Pred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    24,408
    Likes Received:
    17,389
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Only she pointed the gun and it was inoperable. And according to castle doctrine in that state they were completely within their rights. An angry violent mob already broke into private property since they destroyed the gate. The difference between a mob on the street and a mob breaking into your house is a few seconds. With them yelling threats it’s just 1 thrown rock. It’s not like there isn’t precedent. Violent mobs just like that one, are destroying property all over the country.
     
    Labouroflove and ModCon like this.
  7. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,642
    Likes Received:
    32,382
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Excellent point.

    You beat me to it.
     
    PARTIZAN1 likes this.
  8. mdrobster

    mdrobster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    34,383
    Likes Received:
    12,983
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Correct, if they didn't point the weapons, this would be a non issue.
     
  9. 61falcon

    61falcon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    21,436
    Likes Received:
    12,227
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    These two were hated by their neighbors!!!
     
  10. glitch

    glitch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2006
    Messages:
    13,607
    Likes Received:
    2,167
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well then that proves it, hang 'em high.
     
    nra37922 likes this.
  11. modernpaladin

    modernpaladin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2017
    Messages:
    27,953
    Likes Received:
    21,262
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes, they are. They totally embarrassed themselves.

    That prosecutor is embarrassing all The People of St. Louis by tampering with evidence. At least the McCloskies can legitimately claim moronic ignorance. Whats the prosecutors excuse?
     
  12. HTownMarine

    HTownMarine Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    Messages:
    8,348
    Likes Received:
    4,155
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So, don't warn them, let them throw the first rock, then fire away.

    Sound strategy.

    I also would have preferred the home owner take it a step further and act completely helpless until the action began. Then, surprise!
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2020
    nra37922 likes this.
  13. fullmetaljack

    fullmetaljack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Messages:
    8,156
    Likes Received:
    6,938
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The Federalist ?
    LMAO

    Fake news.

    BTW, for the purpose of prosecuting this wing-nut it doesn't matter whether the weapon worked or not. I'd love for the defense to try and raise that issue at trial.
     
  14. Nunya D.

    Nunya D. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2010
    Messages:
    10,193
    Likes Received:
    2,797
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually it does. The law they are trying to prosecute them on specifically says the weapon must be functional. The handgun was not functional and it was intentional. The handgun was used as a prop in a court case and the spring for the firing pin was intentionally installed incorrectly.
     
    AmericanNationalist and glitch like this.
  15. fullmetaljack

    fullmetaljack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Messages:
    8,156
    Likes Received:
    6,938
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Interesting. I suppose the "functional" part was created to address certain specific situations. Hypothetically, if she pointed the weapon at someone and they defended themselves with deadly force, they would have a great case for self-defense.
     
  16. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You might want to make yourself familiar with Missouri law.... As you are clearly wrong.
     
  17. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You might also want to look up Castle Doctrine as far as Missouri is concerned... Being even slightly educated on a topic will keep you from looking foolish from the get go..

    You are welcome.
     
  18. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,147
    Likes Received:
    32,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Castle doctrine does not allow you to act preemptively.
    It also does not allow you to brandish at people on a sidewalk, street or yard.
     
    DivineComedy likes this.
  19. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,147
    Likes Received:
    32,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    They were walking past their home. You cannot shoot someone for walking towards your home.
     
  20. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In Missouri if you think you are threatened on your own property that is all it takes...

    They broke into a private community... You might want to look up brandishing as well as you are wrong.
     
  21. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,147
    Likes Received:
    32,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Oh so now we are adding psychic powers to determine what people are doing in determining who you can shoot at...

    cult45
     
  22. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,147
    Likes Received:
    32,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You have to meet force with an equal level of force, pointing a gun at someone because they are on your sidewalk protesting does not equal deadly force.

    You should not pull a weapon unless you intend to use it, my firearms instructor had a few choice words to describe cowards that pull out weapons to threaten others.
     
  23. RP12

    RP12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    48,878
    Likes Received:
    11,755
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No.

    You...

    Dont..

    Read...

    the

    LAw
     
  24. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,147
    Likes Received:
    32,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The moment they entered their home the homeowners had the eight to use deadly force.
    Standing outside, brandishing weapons with one being inoperable coupled with horrible muzzle discipline ...

    If I pull my weapon on you I am going to fire, it isn’t a prop.

    I am not surprised the normal posters are defending this.
     
  25. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,147
    Likes Received:
    32,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Please post the law that says you can pull a weapon on someone who is unarmed standing on the sidewalk. I’ll wait.
     

Share This Page