If such were indeed enough, there would be absolutely no argument on the part of yourself, none whatsoever, against forcing all law enforcement precincts and military personnel in the united states to accept the same capacity limitations.
Was it your store burnt to the ground? Was it your child who was murdered? Was it your wife who was killed for saying all lives matter?
No private citizen has ever been faced with the threat of harm being committed by a criminal or terrorist? Absolutely none? Criminals and terrorists focus exclusively on law enforcement personnel and leave the private citizens alone? Is that how things work in the united states?
Not relevant to the discussion. Try again. No private citizen has ever been faced with the threat of harm being committed by a criminal or terrorist? Absolutely none? Criminals and terrorists focus exclusively on law enforcement personnel and leave the private citizens alone? Is that how things work in the united states?
How many is enough is up to the individual. That's why it says "right to keep and bear arms" instead of "right to keep and bear arms limited to 10 rounds of ammunition in a magazine".
The only direction gun ownership is taking in this country is the direction you don't like. Even the dumbest leftist was standing outside a gun store after Marxists burned down their cities.