I still want to know why he admits to owning a weapon of war capable of firing multiple rounds with a single pull of the trigger.
Because there wasn't enough support to pass the numerous proposals that he supported. Instead, he did what he could legally get away with, like- https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ob...-course-forbids-sale-of-850000-antique-rifles
It's not mentioned so it's likely none... 10 just seems like a reasonable compromise (for now), but reasonable doesn't seem to fly anymore..
I don't really care what your opinion is. The right to keep and bear arms is the right of every individual. The definition of arms doesn't include a 10 round limit, unfortunately for you.
Really. Where does it say that. I bet it's one more thing you really really think you understand and actually don't.
Oh, and btw. Here are all the standard issue weapons given to US Marines https://www.businessinsider.com/all-the-standard-issue-weapons-given-to-us-marines-2018-6
Why not just look at statistics in other countries that had the common sense to do something about it...
If it goes en banc its still gone within a few years tops. Likely sooner. Time for drum mags for my drum mags.
I agree... en banc is now the boogie man of the right.. Let me know when it is.. I doubt I'll be following this with so much Trump corruption to keep track of..