NO evidence of nationwide election fraud!!

Exactly. They just don't get it. Or maybe they do but can't admit it. Maybe they feel they need to toe the company line instead of thinking for themselves. Who the hell knows

 

You and @dairyair need to stop being so damn logical....it only upsets them.

 

What they're basically claiming is that because check fraud occurs, we should invalidate all checks. The arguments have defied logic all along, and I don't expect that to change anytime soon.

 

I know. I wish it didn't.

January 20th is going to be a rude awakening. Most seem unprepared. I don't think it's sunk in yet, that on that date, Trump becomes powerless, and will face the full force of the law outside that which he surely will pardon himself for. Obama's gone. Trump will be gone...maybe long gone. It's going to be unfamiliar territory for Trump supporters.

 

I did not say they were ok. Irregularities must be cured, and they are, before the certification.

What is not okay is assuming that because of normal irregularities, this equals 'massive conspiracy'.

That is NOT okay. If that allegation is made, evidence is required, and to date, out of 25 lawsuits, none such evidence has been provided.

Capiche?

 

No evidence.

I thought so.

 

At some point in this thread you said something to the effect that 2700 votes is only .00016%. For that to be true, around 1.7 billion votes would have to be cast.

 

That is the only point.

why? Because that is what team trump alleging and you seem to be defending Team Trump.

Minor and innocent irregularities occur in all elections, and are cured before the certification.

So what the **** is your problem?

 

He must seem to think everything is about him. Odd.

 

Typo. It's .0016% approximating that 160,000,000 votes were cast, give or take 10 million. I think it's actually closer to 150,000,000
Not impressive, either way.

 

I take it you're ignoring the Sydney Powell expose'?

 

Everybody who is somebody is ignoring it. Good enough for me. Are you ignoring that?

 

Nope the Republicans weren't allowed

 

Never heard of it.

 

Link to your claim?

 

F'n chicken poop pansies. Not allowed. LOL. What an pathetic excuse republicans must be. Incompetent at running elections with so much massive voter fraud occurring under their noses. And then they are tooo scared to stand up for their own well being.

 

That is what I said. I could not have been about me. The post must have been about someone else.

 

That's not only false, the case was laughed out of court. That's becoming redundant. It's clear that Trump case = "laughed out of court." I predict that in some future meeting of the ABA, the word "frivolous" will be officially be replaced with "Trump."

Not true. There were a non-zero amount of Republican observers allowed. Surely you've heard.

 

My my.

 

Yeah, didn't you hear. Their kids were threatened. Must be those same FBI guys that threatened Flynn's kid. Smh.

And the incompetence! Lol.

 

I am a bit tired of you totalitarians claiming "no evidence"

 

Why would you ignore our votes being tallied in Germany on software designed to steal the vote for Chavez?

 

You only listen to fake news. They will not even give her a hearing but the courts will.

 

I am a bit tired of liars claiming there is evidence without ever providing such evidence.

 

For this fraud to be sooo widespread all over the country and sooo massive.

R's in politics have to be incompetent to let it get soooo bad.