Rioting for me, but not for thee

You forgot about

Well that's one out of thousands, can you show that even one tenth of one percent of the crowd consisted of BLM activists?

 

Nice. You selected the one sentence that conflicted with everything else he said. LOL!!!!

Ah! So you found one black person who "claimed" to be a BLM member. And no other black person was there to be seen in anything in your link. You can't reasonably claim the insurrection was a mixed-race event shared by blacks and whites.

 

Utter anti American propaganda. Where are you from? This country was built on individual freedom and personal achievement by white men who then fought and died to secure those values and rights to all future Americans. And there is no racism, subtle or outspoken in Trumps words. The enviable list of the Trump administrations accomplishments have gone to serve and better the lives of all Americans. The Trump administration has made America more secure, more just, stronger, safer, and more prosperous. The only bad from the four years that Trump was President is the constant fear mongering, baseless allegations, smears and hateful divisive rhetoric coming from the Democrat party and the Democrat media 24/7. With Trump now essentially gone, do you not notice how quiet it has become? That'd be the Democrat media in repose, their task accomplished. You have not beaten Trump. You have appeased and thereby quieted your media. To answer your question about why so few if any non whites participated in the DC riot, I suppose it is two fold. One, there was no financial gain as it was a matter of principle(right or wrong). And two, they were probably all too busy rioting elsewhere. Not to mention that the vast majority of non whites are Democrats.

 

Pure propaganda. This country was built with slave labor, the Confederacy was and remains racist, US Intel has found that with the early development of Sheriffs their main function was as a force to deal with "renegade" blacks and that trend has carried over into our police forces today with many white supremacists at large in our police, blacks continue to be suppressed and poor and disadvantaged, and racism is seen frequently on this forum as with all other political forums. Trump is a known, proven racist as you know very well.

"How quiet it has become"????? ARE YOU KIDDING????? Are you saying you don't know that all social media has finally banned him?? NO WONDER HE HAS BEEN QUIET!

Many, many people like myself KNEW that Trump was a narcissistic sociopath bent on a path to despotic dictatorship from as early as the end of his first year in office. And your pro-insurrection sentiments notwithstanding, you will see a hell of a fight to stop him and his thugs from seizing control of America for his dictatorship.

 

You absolutely MUST try to change the topic eh? What's with you guys lately?

 

Why would I have to prove there were non whites at the Capitol? Would that excuse the rioting in your mind?

And please quote the "white supremacy" part of Trump's speech at the Capitol. I somehow missed it.

 

You don't know is from what. The dictatorship has already formed. It has, over the decades, corrupted and consumed the colleges, the Democrat party, the mainstream media, and the internet giants into one monolithic gob. I repeat, Trump served America's interests and preserved Americans liberties. Your fascination with his offhand remarks and the media making a mountain of hash of it while ignoring and minimizing his accomplishments has left you a vacant witness to nothing but unsubstantial emotion.

 

Donald Trump has a history of exploiting racism. I don't know what makes you think that serves America's interest, unless you believe in white supremacy.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/articl...-versus-black-season-of-the-appre#.teymNdKAmd

 

Didn't Biden supporters riot is DC, break everything they could get away with including monuments, set fire to a historical Church across from the Capitol, assault police, and assault Rand Paul and his wife? I think authorities had to call for a curfew as well. The only time Democrats and the Democrat media make a big deal about it is when someone other than themselves are doing the rioting. What a bunch of actors.

 

...... The GOP propaganda machine has conflated BLM/antifa and the rioters and looters just like they always conflate socialism and communism. Works great with the missinformed.

 

They're still investigating. Either way, you're switching the subject: we were asked for at least one non-white that was a part of the riot, and I provided that. So I win. Get it?

 

The fig leaf just fell off.

THE GARRISON STATE, "The Garrison State is a state dominated by the military-industrial complex. President Dwight D. Eisenhower believed that a deep, even paranoid, fear of the military might and superiority of Soviet Union would turn the United States into a "garrison state", with an economy dominated by military spending and civil liberties eroded. The military-industrial complex became a force in itself, consuming a majority of the United States discretionary federal budget on the expense of infrastructure, educational or health spending, spreading fear among the populace and looking for enemies to replace the Soviet Union after the end of the Cold War.[4]" Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Garrison_State

 

Oh dump that somewhere else. Since when is insurrection something that only happens at the Capital building. But not surprised you have adopted the some insurrection is OK especially if on the left. Tell me is it only the actual main Capital building that counts when it comes to insurrection? Just the main building there?

 

Indeed you found one out of thousands!

 

That's one more than any Republican that was involved in the BLM / Antifa riots over the summer.

 

The rioters and looters were not BLM or antifa, they were common criminals. You have been conflated

 

But why not call them protesters?

Why is this guy a rioter, Trump supporter, Trump loyalist, etc.?



But the people who burned down a building, beat people up, destroyed public property considered protesters?





Surely, you would agree that burning down a building, destroying public property, and beating people up are worse than simply trespassing, propping your feet up on a desk, right? If you do agree with that, then why is this guy not called a protester? You don't have to say what he is doing is protesting, but why not call him a protester? Riddle me that.

 

They were criminals that belong to Antifa and BLM.

 

He's not actually protesting.

 

False and they were they were members of BLM and Antifa carried their signs and symbols.

 

So beating people up, burning down buildings, and destroying public property allows you to be considered a protester, but propping your feet on a desk does not entitle you to be called a protester? Got it.

 

Did you not see how the rioters got into the Capitol?
Riot: a violent disturbance of the peace by a crowd.
That is why the guy with his feet up is considered a rioter. Or do you think that pic was taken during a nice visit with Pelosi???

 

But why were the people in those videos that burned down a building, beat people up, and destroyed public property called protesters, not rioters?

 

Don’t know. Why were they referred to as riots in the links below?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/5675343002

https://www.city-journal.org/2020-riots-protests

 

No you don't got it.