Census shows US is diversifying, white population shrinking - AP

So anti-discrimination means discrimination of white heterosexual males?
Racial war is constant blame of whites as source of all problems.
Democrat party also support unconstitutional privileges for blacks.
The reason for unconstitutional privileges is an existence of the white people.
So if you blame white race for everything, deprive them economic opportunities, it is an act of war.

 

I am NOT being PAID to educate Science Denialists who BELIEVE in SUPERSTITIONS.

FACTS matter, superstitions DON'T!

 

funny thing is, the Bible was written by middle eastern people with darker skin, they don't even get the irony of believing in the bible

they think cause the names were changed to English sounding names, the characters all must be white

 

I got mixed genes, means I can enjoy the sun, don't have to use a tanning booth, yep, I be a mutt, I admit it, nothing wrong with it

both races racists need to get over themselves, we are all one race, just some have different color hair, skin, eye colors, ect.....

 

It's not natural. It's a learned behavior.

...
Discriminatory and racial behavior may be learned in children as young as three years old, according to Mahzarin Banaji (a psychologist, brain researcher, and racism and physical prejudice expert from Harvard University). Children are quick to demonstrate racist behavior and form connectivity between negative biases following exposure to episodes of discrimination.
Racism is Learned at an Early Age | Applied Social Psychology (ASP) (psu.edu)

...
Dislike whomever you please. But if you operate a business and apply for a license to operate a business, you agree to the laws of the state in which you get the license.

 

I can only give you the correct information. What you do with it is your issue. AA is USSC supported.

Having been a white male all my life, I've never experienced discrimination. And neither have you.

 

Of course its a learned behavior, but what you're saying is that we shouldn't discriminate against anyone. Do you feel the same way about discrimination against the Taliban or Al Queda even though we were raised with other morals and beliefs and disapprove of their actions?

Do you believe that everyone in the world should be forced into one mold and raised with one set of beliefs and standards? Wouldn't that be tyranny? Besides, whose to say what those beliefs and standards should be? You say they should be your beliefs, and Islamist extremists like Al Queda and the Taliban say it should be their beliefs, so whose morals and standards are right?

So what! If people feel comfortable being among those who were raised in a similar environment, speak a similar language, have similar beliefs, and have had similar schooling and experiences, they have every right to prefer them to others.

The state has no right to impose anything on anyone unless it directly hurts others physically or financially in some way. When someone invests in a business, then that business is his, and he should be free to do what he wants. My father owned a business and he had every right to hire whoever he wanted, and to kick out whoever he didn't want - and he did.

This country grew because of small business', and it's the imposition of stupidities by liberal groups that are destroying it.



This land we love so mightily,
should not be handed readily,

to selfish men with hearts of stone,
who thinkest only of their own.

And who will come so angrily
to tellest us so blatantly

that we should never dare to stray.
For only they should have a say.

And that we not do as we please,
while forcing us upon our knees,

to worship gods of sin and greed.
And things that we can never heed.

Now these are things we did not choose.
And freedoms something we can't lose.

To liberal laws and swords so cruel
and brandished 'bout by those who rule.- Jeannette

 

You're confused.

The White x-tians from Latin America don't live on reservations like the non-White x-tians do.

The illegals aliens in the US from Latin America are not White people.

They're so-called "Native Americans" (snicker) except since they speak Spanish, the Media lovingly refers to them as Hispanics, and apparently Hispanics get more love than Native Americans.

Note that the media rails against "discrimination" against the Spanish-speaking Native Americans called Hispanics while pretending the English-speaking Native Americans don't exist.

And, why, yes, Mexico does have Indian Reservations just like the US does (most of them are on the west coast of Mexico.)

 

Correct, we should NOT discriminate anyone just because of their sex, sex orientation, skin color, ethnicity, or any other physical trait.

 

Hey, the Hispanics do not have oil wells in Oklahoma or gambling casinos without being taxed - so let's not compare one to the other. My priest would go to Mexico in the summer with some teenagers to build a house for a Hispanic family. He said it was only 4 walls, and yet the amount of gratitude they had was unbelievable.

If we really wanted to retain our Anglo/German culture, because that's what this country really is, then we should have helped the Central and South American nations prosper, rather than manipulate them for our own benefit. It would have been very easy you know.

All we needed was a wall to stop the migrants from entering illegally, so that we could give them work visas. The money they made would have been sent back home to feed their families and thereby raise their nations economy. Once their home countries began to prosper a little, they would have stopped coming.

This is how it was done in Europe after WWII. We had the Marshall Plan so Germany could rebuild and they needed workers.. The workers came from Southern Europe and had to return home in 2 years. Later on when their own nations economy began to stabilize, the migrant workers stopped going to Germany.

Germany's problem began when they were forced to hire Muslims. Turkey and the other nations refused to take them back so that they could propagate their faith. With the excuse that the managers didn't want to train workers every 2 years, Germany changed its laws.

 

Wouldn't that make them citizens by default?

 

Telling people who they should or shouldn't discriminate against is tyranny. But then again self designated 'gods' are above such mundane concepts.

​

Take that you fools of misery.
For we as gods of lofty see,
who practice ancient pagan rites
to fuel our base and flagrant life.

Are unlike you - such lowly fools
who follow banal moral rules.
We have our own within our stead
of hubris and of bloated head. - Jeannette

 

Thanks for admitting you're part of the problem.

The false narrative pushed by Academia is that humanity constantly advances.

Why? Because it's, um, you know, beautiful.

To think that humanity could take two steps backwards is not something Academia wants to think about.

But it happened nonetheless, and we know who was the cause.

The Greeks.

Everyone from the Sumerians on down to the Greeks know Earth was a spheroid and that Earth orbited the Sun.

The Greeks, with their empirical evidence nonsense, couldn't wrap their brains around it and it is they who foisted the nonsense that Earth was flat, and not merely the center of our Solar System, but the center of the Universe.

It was the Greeks who invented Hell and the "soul."

The Greeks couldn't translate a specific phrase from Sumerian/Akkadian text which state that "The domain of Nergal is down-under"

That didn't make sense to the Greeks, because they, um, "knew" Earth was flat and so there can't be an equator or southern hemisphere.

To the Greeks, if Nergal's domain was down-under, then it had to be under the Earth.

Hence: Underworld -- what people came to know as Hell.

Likewise, the Greeks had seen a human brain for various reasons, but were unaware the human brain consists of billions of highly specialized cells that are differentiated from other human cells in the human body, and that it was chemical interactions among those highly specialized brain cells that gave rise to consciousness, thought, personality etc.

Since they didn't know that -- and it would be 2,000 years before a human actually saw a biological cell in the year 1607 -- they, um, you know, decided that a human is because it is inhabited by a "soul" and it is the soul that gave rise to consciousness and caused us to think and behave.

And then the Imperial Roman Catholic Church adopted that nonsense, as well as the nonsense spewed by Aristotle that human birth is the result of spontaneous regeneration and disease is caused by invisible gases etc etc etc and rammed it down everyone's throats under penalty of death.

Yeah, you got the death penalty for claiming Earth was a sphere or that Earth revolved around the Sun.

That's why Galileo got excommunicated, because, embarrassingly, the Church tried and failed to assassinate him on multiple occasions.

How long did it take for the Church to finally admit Galileo was right?

And, still, the Church refuses to admit it was wrong or that the Poop-de-Doos are highly fallible.

If it wasn't for the stupid Greeks and the satanic Church, we'd have landed a man on the Moon 500 years ago and we'd be far more scientifically and medically advanced than we are now.

Just in case you're wondering, there is no such thing as a Babylonian people or tribe. It was merely a city.

Sumer was conquered by Sargon of Akkad in 2334 BCE.

Sumer & Akkad were conquered by the Gutians a century later, and after about a century of "barracks emperors" (Gutian generals), Sumer regained control in 2150 BCE.

Next comes Sodom, Gomorrah and the Amorites.

Sumer was destroyed and never inhabited again. Ever.

No one knows what happened, but we know a helluva lot about the Sumerians. Why?

Because they literally freaking jumped up and ran out the door with nothing but the clothes on their backs and they never returned.

And that was in the afternoon. We know that because they freaking fled so suddenly they left food cooking in clay pots on the hearths in their homes. The first find archaeologists considered "lucky" but when they found food in clay pots in home after home in city after city people started asking what the hell happened. The contents of the clay pots were analyzed, so we know what they ate and the spices they used.

They left their clothing and jewelry and personal effects behind, too. Whatever it was affected only Sumer and not Akkad, and the Sumerian cities (all north of Akkad) were never inhabited again, but there are no signs of destruction, so it wasn't some kind of conquest.

The Sumerians fled north around the Hittite Kingdom, then around the Black Sea into the Balkans. We know that because we have Sarmezigetusa in Romania. That region was ostensibly inhabited by Dacians, but Dacian words are all Sumerian. We can break Sarmezigetusa down:

sar = great year (3,600 years) or circle
me = knowledge
zi = Heavens
ge = Earth
tus = Applying Grimm's Law of vocalic and fricative shifts, 't' and 's' and 'z' have the same sound in many languages and note Romanian has two "t's" one with a 't' sound and one with a 'ts' sound, so the related Sumerian word is "zuz." Putting it all together:

circle knowledge Heavens Earth bond (of -- the 'a' is genitive construction)

Translation: The Circle of Knowledge Bonding Heaven and Earth

Yeah, that's right. Sarmezigetusa was a solar/lunar observatory used to track solar and lunar eclipses, Moon phases, the Sun's northing and southing points (solstices), the equinoxes, and the rising and setting times of planets.

Anyway, the Amorite tribe took over Akkad and they are erroneously referred to as "Babylonians" although now in the literature of Academia they are called "Old Babylonians." That was 1830 BCE.

The Kassites kicked out the Amorites circa 1530 BCE. The Kassites are the people Old Testament texts erroneously refers to as Kushites from Kush in Africa. Wrong. The Kassites lived in the area between the Tigris River and the Zagros Mountains in Iran.

The Akkadians regained control circa 1125 BCE. They are erroneously referred to as the Second Babylonian Kingdom, although Academia now refers to them as "Middle Babylonia."

The Assyrians over-ran the Akkadians in 729 BCE.

At that point, Greeks became world renown as government administrators.

Greeks were not the government, but they were employees who administered government in Persia, Media, Assyria, other kingdoms in Mesopotamia, kingdoms in the Levant including the Kingdom of Israel, but apparently not the Kingdom of Judah, and also Egypt.

These Greek administrators brought with them not just their language, but also their culture with Hell and soul nonsense.

If you want to know how intense Greek culture permeated and contaminated these other cultures, just look at the Septuagint.

95% of Hebrews couldn't speak Hebrew or Aramaic, which is why the Hebrew texts were translated into Greek.

Then the Chaldeans (aka New Babylonians) take over in 612 BCE.

It's important to understand that these Greek administrators didn't just run the governments, they also translated texts from existing and previous cultures, as well as wrote the histories.

And then the Persians took over in 529 BCE. Note that Cyrus is not Persian. He's Median. His mother was a Median princess and he was born in Mede. The reason Cyrus was given kingship of Persia is precisely because his mother was a Median princess and then he overthrew the Median king and merged Persia with Media.

There have been numerous attempts to correct the errors made by the Greeks. For example, we now have numerous texts from Sumer, Akkad and other kingdoms in Mesopotamia who sent ships to a certain place described as having a wild river flowing from the mountains to the sea and lots of gold (which is why they were sending their ships there.)

To the ancients, a "wild" river was any river that was not navigable and what they're describing is the Zambezi River that flows from the mountains to the sea and that whole area is filled with gold mines and it is in southern Africa, ie, the domain of Nergal.

Engineers, geologists and archaeologists from South Africa found gold mines by looking for the shafts and entrances to ancient gold mines. You can read about that, because they often published their works in relevant journals in the 19-teens, 1920s and 1930s.

In light of Greek stupidity, a compromise was reached among Academia that "underworld" should be translated as "netherworld" but that is till incorrect.

Anyway, you can see how the Greeks (and the Imperial Roman Catholic Church) ruined everyone's lives and set us backward.

 

Yeah, you whiteys cant comprehend racial discrimination. I was tormented as a child for my brown freckles. If your not a person of color, you just couldnt understand.

 

Humanity has now progressed passed those shortcomings. And the vast majority haven't circled back to them.
And you went back centuries to prove things don't always move forward in a straight line.

Thanks for proving my point.

 

And then came the Protestant reformation. Widespread translation and printing of bibles and Thomas Paine using the text of the bible in his Pamphlet "Common Sense" to demonstrate the illegitimacy of the divine rule of monarchs and the legitimacy of government of by and for the people.

 

Thanks for the white-splaining. White men are the most discriminated-against group in America. Maybe one day we can get us a good ol fix for that, like Affirmative Action.

 

Citizens of what, South America? I didn't know South America was a country.

 

Is it better for you that your god tells you to discriminate? Better to judge another so you can discriminate?

 

Ran across the other day some transgendered woman blog bitching about heterosexual men discriminating against the transgendered and refusing to date her.

 

"Native American" refers to Indian tribes in north America. Mexico does nor recognize such people.

Not sure why the other poster refers to all Hispanics as "Native Americans".

 

How many jobs were you turned down for because of your freckles? Did you not get into a school because of them? Make you use your own bathroom?

 

???? Some of them are. Or do you consider someone of Spanish descent to be brown? I know a beautiful Mexican woman whose most striking feature is her porcelain white skin.

 

Odd, you ran across a transgendered woman blog?
I suppose not dating a person because they have red hair or other trait unappealing to one is a form of discrimination.
But as long as you don't completely ignore people or treat them badly because of a trait, it is a discrimination that will always exist. We can't date everyone in the world, I don't think.

So did you not get jobs due to your freckles?

 

By the time I was 16, looking for a job they primarily discriminated against me because my hair was halfway down my back. There was even a popular song at the time. "Sign says, long haired freaky people, need not apply, so I tucked my hair up under my hat and I went in and asked him why".