Census shows US is diversifying, white population shrinking - AP

He was a Caucasoid, and not a Negroid, Mongoloid or Aboriginoid.

He may have been off-white, but he was Caucasian nonetheless.

The fact that human migrations may have originated in Africa is not proof those humans were Black.

You are employing an anachronism, which is unbecoming and damages your claims.

The Multi-Regional Theory was poo-pooed for decades, but now new evidence over the last 10-15 years is giving it tremendous strength.

The evidence shows four distinct human races arose independently in Europe, Asia and Africa.

I realize you're the victim of the Liberal education system and Political Correctness and don't understand some of the disingenuous arguments proffered.

We are deceptively told that race is an artificial construct and that we share 98% of the same genes.

But medical science says otherwise. If race was an artificial construct, then it would be totally impossible for any coroner on this Earth to examine skeletal remains for 30 seconds or less and determine a person's race.

And yet, coroner's all over the world do that everyday.

In 1984, I was about 40 meters into the woods off German federal highway B6 staring at skeletal remains. A German coroner walked up, looked at the skeleton for less than 30 seconds, then said, "It's not our problem." I asked him why (in German) and he said it was a Black female late teens or early 20s.

Now, how could he know that without doing a physical examination?

Because there are biological, physiological and anatomical differences between the four races which are readily apparent and obvious to persons so-trained to recognize those differences.

He was right. She was a 16 year old Black female, the victim of a hit-and-run, who had been there since 1956, almost 30 years.

If humans had only 100 genes, then 98% would truly be impressive, since that means we share 98 genes and only 2 genes are different.

However, at last tally, there were 3,088,286,401 base-pairs.

98% of 3,088,286,401 is 3,026,520,672.

It is in those 61,765,728 base-pairs that lies the difference that is race.

Everybody get over it already.

 

What confused me is that you said the messiah can be any colour. Clearly he cant. If we are to assume he was of the same complextion as the biblical israelites then surely he was black since the biblical israelites as a ppl had wooly hair. What othee ppl have wooly hair other than so called black folk?

 

And yet no one questions discriminating against people with red hair, but if your 6ft tall, 250 lbs, bearded with a 10 inch dick, but you like wearing a pretty red dress, heals with red hair, discrimination cant be tolerated. Even if you were discriminating against "her" because of her red hair, it will be assumed you are discriminating because you hate the transgendered.

 

Abstract
Using gene frequency data for 62 protein loci and 23 blood group loci, we studied the genetic relationship of the three major races of man, Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid. Genetic distance data indicate that Caucasoid and Mongoloid are somewhat closer to each other than to Negroid. Analysis of restriction site data for mitochondrial DNA also shows the same genetic relationship. It seems that the Negroid and the Caucasoid-Mongoloid groups diverged about 110,000 +/- 34,000 years ago, whereas Caucasoid and Mongoloid diverged about 41,000 +/- 15,000 years ago. The genetic relationships of various races in each group of Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid were also studied.
Evolution of human races at the gene level - PubMed (nih.gov)

...
If these groups diverged, that means they had to be of the same in order to diverge.

 

Sure it can. No one has a picture of it.
So you believe it's a black skin Messiah and the other poster believes it's a white skin Messiah.
Same Messiah, just different beliefs.

 

I am unaware of redheads or freckle faces not getting jobs or into schools for having red hair and/or freckles. I don't recall in history when they needed separate bathrooms or not allowed to marry. Maybe you have some insight?

Discrimination laws pertain to jobs, gov't, schools, etc. Not individual preferences.

 

Has nothing to do with Israelites and was instead a prophecy in the future of Jesus appearance in revelations. Old people get white hair.

14 His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire;

 

It is a myth that species cannot interbreed, and that if they do, the off-spring cannot reproduce.

DNA can mutate as the result of natural or coerced mutations.

Such mutations allow to identify both Y- and mt-DNA Haplogroups. DNA also allows us to know which people living none have Neanderthal DNA or not, or which have other types of DNA.

Everything in the "Bible" is false and erroneous.

Take X-Moses.

The word "moses" is an Egyptian worded rendered in both Egyptian and Hebrew as m-s-s.

You should know that both Egyptian and Hebrew are consonantal languages, meaning there are no vowels. Vowels were added to Hebrew in the Modern Era.

The word "m-s-s" means "emanated from" and it was always prefixed with the name of a deity.

So, Ptahmoses: emanated from the god Ptah.
Anmoses: emanated from the god An (also rendered On)
Amenmoses: emanated from the god Amen
Tutmoses: emanated from the god Toth
Dedumoses: emanated from the god Dedu
Rameses or Ramoses (both are correct): emanated from the god Ra

Obviously, it never occurred to you that the reason no one can find an historical record of "Moses" is because no Egyptian would be so damn stupid as to name their kid "emanated from."

The real name of the person named "Moses" was likely Amenmoses or Anmoses, based on the evidence.

Two fanatical Yahweh freaks, namely Jeremiah and Hilkiah, committed pious fraud in their forgery of Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic Histories, as well as the wholesale editing of then-existing texts.

They certainly knew who the gods An and Amen were, and they would have been 100% totally offended by it and so when they edited and re-wrote the Hebrew texts -- and we know for a fact they did -- they simply changed Anmoses/Amenmoses to "Moses."

I just proved your Bible is in error and inaccurate.

 

Ah, so when you say "Correct, we should NOT discriminate anyone just because of their sex, sex orientation, skin color, ethnicity, or any other physical trait." you make an exemption for people with red hair or freckles.

 

Hmm, where?

 

You have indeed succeeded to confuse me; congratulations

 

A human of a different color isnt a separate "species" and interbreeding occurs giving the offspring a mixture of DNA from people of different colors.

 

???? Here, post 685, dairyair, Today at 10:11 AM

 

Do you understand that a lot of people whose ancestors immigrated from Spain and Portugal, live in Latin America?

 

Oh, but you didn't tell us who gave us the 10 Commandments - which means you didn't prove anything.

 

I don't see where the exception is to redheads or freckles.

 

mistake

 

That's because heterosexual dudes don't date men.

 

I wasn't talking about normal mutations which occur about every 800 years. I was talking about Neanderthal DNA which exist in Europeans as well as Asians - but not in blacks. The Asians also carry Denisovan DNA, probably from inbreeding with Neanderthals in the Far East. They did find a body of a girl recently who was a mixture of a Denisovan and Neanderthal.

My mother said that in Greece they called boys born with tails 'manly'. Could the tails have been from the Denisovans, or some previous species? Who know?

 

Africans carry surprising amount of Neanderthal DNA
Africans carry surprising amount of Neanderthal DNA | Science | AAAS

 

No. Only in the world the of Romantic Academia and stupid x-tians.

Academia attempts to crow-bar everything into the preconceived paradigm they have constructed as do x-tians.

Any "Bible" or any person who says "flood" is lying intentionally or through sheer ignorance.

The word used in the Hebrew text is a Sumerian-Akkadian loan word and the only possible translation is "deluge."

A "flood" and a "deluge" are not the same thing.

Anyone who claims they are the same thing is both ignorant and employing and anachronism.

Just because something means something now, it does not logically follow it always did.

Take the word "****", now used in a derogatory manner against women, but originally it was a term of endearment, love and affection toward a woman.

Yes, words in the English language change over time, because English is not a connotial language. Hebrew, Aramaic, Sumerian and Akkadian are connotial languages. So are German and French, which is the reason German was used in science and French in diplomacy for centuries, because it was impossible to be misunderstood: A word means one thing and one thing only and it never means anything else. Not ever.

If you're reading a "Bible" and the 5th Commandment says "kill" then throw it away because it was falsely, erroneously and incorrectly translated. The only true, correct and accurate translation is "You will not murder."

Hebrew has 3 distinct verbs that have the same meaning: To take a life.

It's the connotations that make all the difference.

The connotation for one verb is to take a life with premeditation, malice aforethought, for personal profit, benefit, gain, advantage or revenge.

The connotation for the second is to take a life through accident, neglect or misadventure.

You're driving down the road one day and sneeze. Your car goes left of center striking the Smith Family's car causing the death of Mom & Dad Smith and their 5 children. A tragedy to be sure.

But, did you murder them?

Really? You had malice in your heart? You knew the Smith Family would be there at that exact moment, that you would be there at that exact moment, you foresaw that you would sneeze, and you did it for personal profit, benefit, gain, advantage or revenge?

Um, no. Wrong answer. You did kill them. Your actions caused their death. There's no negligence here, so chalk it up to accident or misadventure.

Some time ago flipping through channels a newscast mentioned "the two officers were slain by the suspect while attempting to serve a warrant."

Seriously? Slain? The suspect had the authority to take the lives of those two officers?

Because that is what "slay" means. Soldiers do not murder or kill other soldiers, they slay them. When the State executes one who committed a Capital crime, the State does not kill or murder, it slays. If you take the life of someone in defense of yourself or another, that is a justifiable homicide, ie you slew them.

Hence, David allegedly slew Goliath. That's one of the few things in the "Bible" translated correctly.

The 3 Sumerian-Akkadian loan-words the Hebrews borrowed all mean "to inundate."

It's their connotations that differ:

1) to inundate by rising waters
2) to inundate by over-flowing waters
3) to inundate by roiling waters moving to and fro

We're interested in #3 because that's the word used.

What roils and moves to and fro?

Um, a tsunami.

If the Black Sea flood is the source of the "flood" myth, that fails, because tribal groups in the Pacific Northwest and Eastern Siberia also have deluge myths.

Cultural diffusion as an explanation fails. More to the point, tribal groups in the eastern Americas have no such myth.

The tribal groups in the Pacific Northwest and Eastern Siberia claim the deluge was caused by a "flaming arrow" or "green arrow" or "green fire" and other appellations in their child-like attempts to explain something they didn't understand.

The amusing thing is Romantic Academia admits the Western Antarctic Ice Sheet is only 8,000 years old, because it somehow was totally destroyed 12,000 years ago and didn't start to reform until circa 6,000 BCE.

Now, what could destroy the Western Ice Sheet, but have no effect on the Eastern Antarctic Ice Sheet?

Can't be climate. Perhaps an asteroid or comet impact, you know, the "green star" thing the tribal groups saw.

And, if those tribal groups saw it, that means it was in a low-trajectory on a southeasterly heading, and heading right smack for the Western Ice Sheet.

Why didn't groups in Mesopotamia mention it? Why would they?

Can everyone on Earth simultaneously see a solar or lunar eclipse? No. That's right, Earth is a sphere.

This asteroid/comet was a helluva lot bigger than the asteroid that created Barringer Crater south of Winslow, Arizona.

Fortunately, it broke up. In low-trajectory, it would have been severely oblated by atmospheric friction as it traveled through the troposphere and broke into pieces casting off smaller pieces everywhere. There is evidence of that from impact fragments at various sites in the US and Canda

Academia lies to you repeatedly in their attempt to crow-bar Atlantis into the teeny tiny island of Santorini.

Academia loves Aristotle, who didn't like Plato and who was wrong on just about everything, not to mention Aristotle was the only Greek philosopher or educator who never spent his child-hood and early teen years studying in Egypt. But Plato did, and so did his maternal uncle Solon, from whom Plato obtained his information.

After spending more than a decade living and studying in Egypt, Solon often returned to visit. It was during one of those visits that Solon was told the story by the priest at the temple in Sais.

I mention that because Academia tries to imply that Solon didn't understand Egyptian and didn't know the difference between 10,000 and 1,000, which is absolutely essential for their attempt to make Santorini as Atlantis.

They also conveniently forget to tell you the priest prefaced the story by saying, "You Hellenes have no history because certain perturbations in the Earth destroy civilizations."

When Egyptians talk about perturbations, they are talking about celestial events, not terrestrial-based phenomenon like catastrophic volcanic eruptions, which is what Santorini was.

Santorini was a teeny tiny island in comparison to other Greek islands, and thus could not have been an island-continent, and despite Crete, Cyprus and other islands dwarfing Santorini in size, they were never referred to as island-continents.

Atlantis was "beyond the pillar of Hercules" -- the rock of Gibraltar -- which refutes the Santorini thesis. It is also said the waters at the mouth of the Mediterranean were muddied for centuries.

Now, what would cause that? Not a volcanic eruption, but a tsunami would.

The Mediterranean is shallower and warmer than the Atlantic and there's a slightly difference in salinity. If a tsunami raced over a land mass in the south Atlantic, the silt and debris would be carried by the currents to the mouth of the Mediterranean, where it would precipitate out due to the difference in density, temperature and salinity, causing the waters to be "muddy."

Was there something in the south Atlantic?

I took a geology class from Professor Briskine (now Professor Emeritus) who studied sea levels along with magnetic reversals in polarity. We used to do reconstructions based on sea levels previously being 450 feet to 600 feet lower than present. Let's look at Earth when sea levels were 450 feet lower:




Uh-oh. What have we here? Gosh, it looks like an island-continent.

Here's another vantage point:



Recognize that?

Was that Atlantis? I don't know. Maybe.

The remnant of an asteroid/comet impacting on/near the Western Antarctic Ice Sheet would have destroyed it, without affecting the Eastern Antarctic Ice Sheet significantly, and cause a tsunami that raced up the Pacific and Indian Oceans, inundating the Persian Valley -- there was no such thing as a Persian Gulf before that -- and may have raced across the Panamanian Isthmus with enough force to inundate Atlantis, but have little effect on the North Atlantic.

The many idiots who constantly edited the Hebrew texts often removed material they thought was irrelevant or which didn't push their particular political and social agenda.

The original Sumerian story from which the Hebrews copied has a great deal of material omitted. The Sumerians say that Nergal in his domain down-under -- meaning southern Africa -- had an observatory and saw something in the heavens (they don't say what he saw.)

He has his father Enki and brother Ningishiddza look at it, and they send for Enki's first-born son Marduk, then they call a meeting of the council of gods at which Enlil decides to withhold this info from humans.

They also say that to commemorate the Deluge, which they say occurred in the Age of Leo (between 12,000 BCE - 10,000 BCE), a sphinx was built in the Land of Magan (Egypt) and that it was paired with another in somewhere in India (which was probably destroyed later or still hasn't been found.)

Now you can see how Egyptologists (snicker) lie when they claim it was Khufu who built the sphinx. Then again, if you take away the Pyramids and the Sphinx, the only contribution to humanity by the world's oldest existing civilization is the falafel (and even that's debatable.)

As you know, people like to build things on the coasts, because you need ports for trade and you need to fish and do other things, so whatever the tsunami didn't destroy would have been obliterated by rising sea levels.

One other thing. You can clearly see the shift in theology by various Mesopotamian civilizations over time:

1) The Deluge was an event the gods were powerless to stop

to

2) The Deluge was an event the gods could stop, but didn't wanna because they're mean-spirited bastards

to

3) The Deluge was caused by gods to punish humans.

It's ironic that the refusal of x-tians to translate the text correctly is part of the reason everyone rains on their "flood myth" parade.

 

And here I thought Neanderthals were red heads

 

Evidently, races not as prone to fathering multiple bastard children are at a mathematical disadvantage.
But so are children with no father in their lives.

 

Mircea, just to answer some of what you wrote. Santorini is considered part of the Minoan civilization. According to the Atlantis legend, they were invaded by the Greeks. What Greeks? They were Central Europeans, so did they even exist in Southern Europe 10 thousand years ago - unless they're thinking of the indigenous Palasgians. Obviously the time element for Atlantis has to be wrong.

Also Atlantis was outside the Pillars of Hercules, and since another continent doesn't exist outside of the Pillars of Hercules (Gibraltar), then Atlantis was probably a sea empire similar to the British empire and had colonies outside Gibraltar. The Greeks said that the Minoans knew the depth of all the seas in the world.

Crete was completely destroyed by a tidal wave when Santorini (Thera) erupted. What we do know is that Linear 1 is not Greek and can't be deciphered, but all the languages that came after it is Greek. This means the Greeks invaded Crete after its destruction.