As the Lauren Boebert "SugarDaddyMeet.com-Gate" begins to expand...and it is going to expand a lot

I really respect your opinion, but please do not assume what my side is. As human beings, we are not monolithic.

 

me say Trump wanted the virus to spread and the reason Trump told the States to shutdown the economy is that he knew the economy was failing, and the only way for him to inject trillions more into the mega corps was to use the virus crisis to do so, if that did not work, he would blame it on the virus, win\win either way as far as Trump was concerned

but this is anouther topic, this one is about Boebert[/QUOTE]

a lot of people don't know this, but the theory that democrats released the coronavirus is a tin foil hat conspiracy theory.

are you guys familiar with the ideas of "lihop" and "mihop" from the old 9/11 conspiracies? if anyone made the pandemic happen on purpose they'd most likely be chinese. the democrats were in no position to let it happen on purpose, and i would not think even trump would do that.

what trump is capable of is "positive thinking," believing that if we just did nothing this would go away by itself, (and, of course, blaming everyone else. )

 

a lot of people don't know this, but the theory that democrats released the coronavirus is a tin foil hat conspiracy theory.

are you guys familiar with the ideas of "lihop" and "mihop" from the old 9/11 conspiracies? if anyone made the pandemic happen on purpose they'd most likely be chinese. the democrats were in no position to let it happen on purpose, and i would not think even trump would do that.

what trump is capable of is "positive thinking," believing that if we just did nothing this would go away by itself, (and, of course, blaming everyone else. )[/QUOTE]
The Democrats love them some Chinese. The timing of it was just too damn coincidental. Then the world health organization was quick to lie about it

 

ypi are very close to the truth wuth this post, hocky dad. the kichs are by no stretch of the imagubation liberal. they are birchers, ultra conservatives, "americans for prosperity" is their main( of many) pac . but. like all big employers they want the cheapest labor available and they want it illegal (easier to control. that is why neither side will ever "fix" the border or the immigration laws. .

 

Not necessarily. Just the allegations are enough when the target is female.

Plus, if she sues, all her business is open to discovery.

She's in a lose/lose situation.

Beyond that, they were totally cool with a hooker, lesbian nude model with the trashy penultimate so clearly the bar is pretty low already.

 

If I lived in her district....the simple fact that she is the target of hate to this extremist degree.....would convince me to vote for her without even knowing her policies. She obviously is pro America and pro Americans...or she wouldn't be going thru these attacks. The left's strategy of slander and lies might make them feel goody all over. But it doesn't produce results anymore.

 

American Muckrakers PAC Outside Spending - OpenSecrets
https://www.opensecrets.org › outsidespending › detail

Outside groups spend millions during an election to influence voters' decisions with political advertising. Explore those expenditures here at ...
Discloses Donors? YES
Viewpoint: LIBERAL
Type of group: SUPER PAC

 

Her attorney has already advised her accusers of her intent to sue.
Rep. Lauren Boebert to take legal action against American ...
https://www.cpr.org › 2022/06/17 › lauen-boebert-laws...

16 hours ago — Boebert attorney Jonathan Anderson wrote to David Wheeler of American Muckrakers PAC on June 15, informing him of her intention to file a civil ...

 

Look at it this way, it's not the source in this case IT'S WHO THE LEAKER CHOSE TO LEAK TO & why they chose that source.

 

Or whether there's a leaker at all.

 

Sure, they is always hope.

 

The last time I saw a response this immediate and categorical was John McCain's reaction to an NYT "other woman" hit piece on the eve of the 2008 election. McCain was right and the NYT was wrong. Boebert's attorney has said she's suing.

 

You are deflecting and using a whataboutism. That should concern you. Posting that the medium is liberal does not mean that the leaker is, and, lawyers posture all day, everyday.

 

As I have suggested, it is not clear there is a legitimate leaker.
And the McCain story is instructive.

 

This is not a rebuttal, it's spin so carry on shining...and hoping.

 

There is nothing to rebut. There has been an accusation, the foundation of which looks shakier and shakier as time passes. The accused has issued a forthright denial and begun counteraction.

 

She's done like breakfast. Sorry.

 

Former Doctor now Congressman Scott DesJarlais cheated on his wife multiple times, had sex with two patients and multiple co-workers, pressured one of his mistresses to have an abortion and encouraged his now ex-wife to have two abortions - which she did (despite a public position opposing abortion). He also took drugs and acted in a threateing manner to his then wife.

This has been known for a decade. He is still in Congress cuz God forgived him.

Assuming this turns out to be correct Bobert may well survive, though being a woman will count against her in the 'morality' stakes.

 

As I said at the outset, I'm not a fan. But my dislike of her does not require me to applaud scurrilous tactics by her opponents. My personal opinion is that her attackers are in for a legal drubbing. We shall see.

 

You keep posting deflection and incremental moving position & always end in the same place.

 

That is false. My position has not changed.
My first post (#26) in this thread: "I'm not a fan of Boebert, but I suspect she may collect a substantial legal settlement from her accusers."

 

Again, I am referencing our post interactions and you are deflecting now somewhere else. It appears to be par for your posting style, kind of leaning to it being intentional?! <- Not really a question.

 

The bar is so low it hits the floor.

 

Interesting and thought-provoking point.

 

You know when you are taking flak that you are over the target.

The more the left hates someone the better for America it means they are.