Where fdo you come up with such a stupid question.. it has nothing to do with a widows and everything to do with immoral hookups and an irresponsible sperm donor. Next mass murderer could well use a molotov cocktail.. "semiautomatic devices" .. really.. You do seem to b e one that argues the exception rather than the rule. .. I hate that.
I guess you want armed criminals to face no resistance We will put you down as supporting safe working conditions for the mopes
yours smell bad because you clearly are not learned in this area. I, on the other hand, am a court certified expert on these issues. Read more of my posts and you will become better educated
Ad Authoriatem fallacy, Look that up and educate yourself as to what it is since you obviously don't know simple hs debating terms..
It has come to the point to determine that who is dangerous and who isn't. It's as bad as judging a book by its cover. Yeah! That is a true one, but there will be those that won't obey the signs.
I buess if hevhas to,lik If I was going to murder a bunch of people, that’s where I’d go! How often do cops get robbed?
Someone has several violent felony convictions or tries to break into my home at night, I really am confident I can determine the person is a mope and needs to be dealt with as such
We shall take a poll-who is better informed about debating gun issues: you or me? How do you think this will turn out. Your anti gun posts are a tsunami of ignorance
wouldn't it be great if the Angel of Death had come along and zapped the murderer with a lightning bolt from the heavens? Everything you support only makes it harder for honest people to be armed-not violent felons
At this point, when I see breaking news of another gun massacre, I find myself thinking another day in America. It's the norm. It's how the majority of Americans choose to live. I don't know how many people have to be murdered in this fashion for the majority to rethink it. All I know is there is no point trying to discuss the topic on this forum, because the pro-massacre crowd have absolutely no interest in discussing the issue, considering facts and arguments contrary to their personal views, and reevaluating their thinking. In fact, that's pretty much the norm for all issues here. It's forum dominated by trolls.
just stop with that nonsense/ No one is pro massacre and just because we don't choose to engage in the bed wetting that some other countries do, doesn't mean we want mass shootings. You call people trolls who don't buy into your psychobabbling nonsense. the vast majority of shooting victims in the USA are felons or close associates of felons and the danger is not nearly what foreign gun banners want us to believe
One point where I agree is that the danger is not that great. Statistically speaking, Americans are at no particularly high risk of being shot despite our terrible lack of gun control. However, none of this changes the fact that mass shootings regularly occur here at far greater frequency than they do in the rest of the first world, where they also do a lot of other things far better, such as offer universal healthcare and make treatment and medication affordable, offer free and affordable higher education, actually protect their consumers from predatory practices by corporations, and so on. There is a lot that the good ol' USA needs to improve on, but we can't because we have so many people living in denial and ignorance.
what Hitler, Stalin, Pol pot, mao, the Kims did to their disarmed populations was massacre.. So , as usual, what the Left accuses us, "Pro-massacre" ! their policies actually are.. it's going to take a lot more nut balls, spurred by the Left, to do enough mass shooting to match the 100 million massacred by the above mentioned.
I doubt it, the Swiss are not exactly known as powers in competitive shooting Now some repressive regimes have good shooters who are essentially government employees like China or Russia
Is there a lot of disproportionate black crime there? The answer is no. There's the problem, it's people not guns.