In 2008 in 17 precincts in Michigan there were 100% votes for Obama. In most populous of those precincts all 580 people voted for Obama. In additional 146 precincts Obama got at least 99% but less than 100%. In the State of New York Obama got 100% of votes in 67 precincts. In additional 200 precincts he got at least 99% but less than 100% . In Washington DC in 21 precincts there were at least 99% of votes for Obama. In the most populous of them out of 2,891 people 2,878 voted for Obama. In Louisiana in 23 precincts Obama got a 100%. In additional 72 precincts he got at least 99% but less than 100%. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362405619_Precincts_with_over_99_vote_for_Obama
Democrats cheat, they have for decades. But in 2016 they got complacent and thought their cheating would tip the count to Hillary, but Trump got so many votes he overcame the cheating. After that upset the democrats went into overdrive on cheating. They would make sure no Republican would win the WH, thats why they did the count to find the margin they needed to "win", shut down in the early morning so they could create votes, and when they opened up the count magically showed Biden* ahead. They did the same on teh 2 Georgia senate runoffs. Thats why its not a certainty that the GOP will win in 2022.
The worst thing is that if it's actually true, it's even more disturbing. That would mean complete, fear-driven indoctrination. Such areas would actually have more in common with theocracies.
They are known for fake papers....and not kicking out child molesters or something like that. Show me a real journal not a social media club. You can't believe everything you see on the internet - Abe Lincoln
I've been doing some spot checking, and you are right. I don't think it passes muster. As in I don't think the OP's claims pass muster. Queens, for example, didn't go 100% for Obama as the OP claims.
Not theocracies. The worst systems in human history were the socialists of the 20th century. The USSR, communist East Germany, China particularly under Mao, Cuba under Castro, Venezuela, North Korea, Ethiopia, Cambodia. All were brutal and drove the people through terror and indoctrination. No theocracy or "religious war" including the Crusades comes close to the butchery of socialism.
I am sure in some rural areas they did Just like a precinct (which are small) in an all african-american neighborhood would be close to 100% for Obama
The nut-wing cackling media hens have pushed things too far. Their BS has become virtually transparent. Republican BS is so stinky I can smell it over the internet.
So? Some cities in democratic areas pack polling places into democratic strongholds in the name of "access". Not surprising at all that Obama did well in hood areas. These are largely places that were not subject to the voting rights act draconian requirements for decades that shaped expectations as to what wards and precincts should look like.
Nope, not even close. The Spanish Inquisition killed - including wars they instigated - less than 300,000 over about 300 years. The highest estimates for the Crusades (essentially a world war over a 200 year period) is 9,000,000 but most historians put the number of deaths much lower. Compare that to the Bolshevik revolution which butchered 500,000 Cossacks (1/3rd of the total) in one year, Stalin butchered 5-20 million in about 35 years, Mao killed 15-40 million in just 4 years (1948-1952) in his "great leap forward". Not to mention all the other deaths in gulags and prisons and "re-education" camps. No system comes even close to the butchery and terror of socialism.
In predominantly black neighborhoods, from Harlem to Brownsville, Brooklyn, to southeast Queens, Mr. Obama won what was very close to a unanimous vote. In the 66 precincts of East New York, Brooklyn, Mitt Romney got 300 votes, out of more than 21,000 cast. 2012 In predominantly black neighborhoods, from Harlem to Brownsville, Brooklyn, to southeast Queens, Mr. Obama won what was very close to a unanimous vote. In the 66 precincts of East New York, Brooklyn, Mitt Romney got 300 votes, out of more than 21,000 cast. East Asian precincts in Flushing, Queens, and in Chinatown in Manhattan voted heavily for Mr. Obama. In the 19 precincts of downtown Flushing, Mr. Obama won 6,086 votes, and Mr. Romney 1,399. Many predominantly Hispanic areas favored Mr. Obama with majorities nearly as heavy as those in black precincts. In the heavily Dominican precincts in Fort George in Upper Manhattan, for instance, the president won 93 percent of the vote. https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nyt.../the-city-vote-precinct-by-precinct.html?_r=0 As of March 31, 2016, Democrats make up 76 percent of the registered voters in the District of Columbia, while 6 percent are registered with the Republican Party Obama won 95% of the black vote nation wide in 2008, why are you surprised largely black precincts, some small, voted for Obama? https://www.pewresearch.org/2008/11/05/inside-obamas-sweeping-victory/
What I found were hundreds of precincts around the nation where Romney didn't get a single vote, and many precincts where President Obama was shutout as well. Political science professor Jonathan Rodden of Stanford University ran the numbers for the 2008 election, and found hundreds of precincts where John McCain received no votes - and some that gave no votes to Obama as well. "If we limit ourselves to precincts in which at least 10 votes were cast, there are almost 180,000" in the U.S., Rodden told me. "Of these, 477 gave every single vote to Obama, and 52 gave every single vote to McCain." https://www.ajc.com/blog/jamie-dupr...s-say-not-voter-fraud/UBtQcSBfew00GpmtrhvzwN/
It's socialism huh? Not dictator type TFG wants? UK, Canada, Australia, Spain, NZ, AMERICA, all socialists nations 160 million people died in wars during the 20th century . https://www.scaruffi.com/politics/massacre.html Mongol conquests 30 MILLION
LOL .. I had to actually check whether you were serious. It seems you are, which makes it even funnier! Not one of those nations is even slightly 'socialist'. All are thumpingly capitalist.