This 'impeachment inquiry' is going nowhere

I hope we all realize.... When Joe Biden kicks the bucket or resigns that this all dies on the vine... he will have gotten away with being the most corrupt and lawless president in our history.. Yet the glaring obvious question, what did Obama know and when did he know it?

 

Interesting
https://nypost.com/2022/04/06/heres-a-dozen-times-joe-biden-played-a-role-in-hunters-deals/

 

The reality here is Jordan and Comer have played the of role useful idiot.They’ve compiled documents, procured witnesses, and scheduled hearings that have exonerated Joe Biden despite the best spin efforts of their Party’s media apparatus. Smoke was the goal—theatre for the base—and that’s been achieved.

With McCarthy backpedaling today it might be a sign he’s finally beginning to grasp the lay of the land. Impeachment, a government shutdown, and his removal would be disastrous for the Party.

 

Whatever
the important fact remains.........

The impeachment is going nowhere.

 

Sorry, there is no proof of any illegal activity mentioned in the provided webpage. The content of the webpage is an excerpt from an article by the New York Post discussing emails found on Hunter Biden's laptop and his business relationship with the head of a consulting firm reportedly under investigation by the Justice Department. It does not provide conclusive evidence of illegal activity.

The document isn't searchable (reader is garbled, resubmit in a searchable format.)

No, there is no direct proof of illegal activity by Hunter, but more importantly, nothing on Joe Biden, mentioned in this particular webpage. The article mainly focuses on an email written by former U.S. embassy official George Kent, which suggests that Hunter Biden's business dealings in Ukraine undermined U.S. efforts to fight corruption in the country. It also mentions allegations of corruption surrounding the Ukrainian company Burisma, on whose board Hunter Biden served. However, it does not provide concrete evidence of illegal activity by Hunter Biden or Joe biden.

You're grasping at straws.

A confidential that is 8 years old having to do with Burisma and a complaint about Hunter, I'm not going to lose sleep over it.

 

You need to cite chapter, line, and page. I'm not going to sift through an entire document, show me crimes by Joe Biden.

I could care less about Hunter.

 

Sorry,
Hunter Biden’s lawyer, George Mesires, has stated that Hunter Biden did not co-found Rosemont Seneca Thornton and had no stake in it. Hunter Biden founded Rosemont Seneca in 2009, but Rosemont Seneca Thorton he was not partnered in, or had a stake in it.
https://www.politifact.com/article/...-biden-got-35-million-/?ref=mainstreem-dotcom

You're batting .000 thus far. You need to up your game.

 

I didn't order to you leave a discussion. Just don't pester me (just me, not others) with time wasting posts

You wrote:

Left wing fact checkers lie. Everyone knows this. Thats why Trump leads the race for re election.

Okay, let's break it down.

Vacuous claim, without foundation.

Vague generalities such as 'everyone knows' is posturing, weasel words, an attempt to gain an advantage
in an argument by claiming the whole world is on your side.

That is a pseudo debate trick. You don't know what every one knows, the very statement is clearly rhetoric.

That's irrelevant.

In short, your reply is a time wasting post, it does not move the debate forward, I call it a pester post, which is why
I asked you to direct that kind of commentary to someone else. I didn't say 'leave the thread'. Eh? No, I didn't.

If you can stay on point, you are welcome to contribute to any comment I make, for or against. I ask you to dispense with the rhetoric.

As for how you respond to others, it's a free country, do or say whatever you want. I just ask you to stay on point when responding
to my comments. And I will try and do the same. I'm not even claiming I'm the paragon of comment perfection, either, I'm trying
to get straight to the argument, because, in my view, all that matters is the argument and anything else is a waste of time.

Of course, others may hold a different view, attitude, but, this is just me.

 

And your point is, what?

 

And the crime is, what?

 

The document titled "Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Corruption: The Impact on U.S. Government Policy and Related Concerns" was produced by the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance. Here are the key findings related to Joe Biden and his family, as mentioned in the document:

1. Hunter Biden's Role in Burisma: In early 2015, George Kent, the former Acting Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine, raised concerns about the perception of a conflict of interest regarding Hunter Biden's role on Burisma's board. This was seen as problematic for U.S. officials pushing an anti-corruption agenda in Ukraine. [Page 4]
2. State Department Official's Concern: In October 2015, Amos Hochstein, a senior State Department official, raised concerns with Vice President Biden about Hunter Biden's position on Burisma's board, suggesting it enabled Russian disinformation efforts and risked undermining U.S. policy in Ukraine. [Page 4]
3. Bribery Allegation: While Hunter Biden was on Burisma's board, the company's owner, Zlochevsky, allegedly paid a $7 million bribe to Ukraine's prosecutor general's office to close a case against him. [Page 5]
4. Financial Transactions: The report details various financial transactions involving the Bidens, including:
   • Hunter Biden and his family received millions from foreign nationals with questionable backgrounds. [Page 5]
   • Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of Moscow. [Page 5]
   • Hunter Biden opened a bank account with Gongwen Dong for a $100,000 global spending spree with James Biden and Sara Biden. [Page 6]
   • Hunter Biden had associations with Chinese nationals linked to the Communist government and the People’s Liberation Army, resulting in significant cash flow. [Page 6]
   • Hunter Biden paid nonresident women from Russia or Eastern European countries, potentially linked to a human trafficking ring. [Page 6]

However, it's important to note that the document primarily focuses on Hunter Biden's activities and associations. While it suggests that the Obama administration was aware of potential conflicts of interest related to Hunter Biden's position on Burisma's board, it does not provide evidence of crimes committed by Joe Biden himself.

The $3.5 million transfer from Yelena Baturina was made to Rosemont Seneca Thorton, and, according to Hunter's lawyer, he had NO stake in that company. Hunter founded Rosemont Seneca, a different company in 2009.

So, I wonder how many other errors are in that report? Hmmmm?

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/09/factchecking-mccarthys-impeachment-inquiry-claims/

 

This 'impeachment inquiry' is going nowhere

Obviously. It is just politics at work in all its ugliness.

 

@Patricio Da Silva

Strange that the son of the resident of the US Joe Biden has his fingers in global shady deals... and Joe don't know nuttin' bout nuttin'

Why would the son of Joe Biden be doing gas deals between Pootin and the Chinese.... hhhhmmmm....

How would the son of the resident Joe Biden know about assassination attempts by the CIA?
What did daddy Joe know and when did he know it? Where is the DOJ investigations into this? Once again the GOP House has to clean up the mess the Democrats and corrupt DOJ have left behind.... Thank you Mr Comer for taking the time to look into this corruption...

How many private citizens on here text their daughter about China arresting CIA operatives and oil deals with Pootin and China?
looks like private citizen Hunter did...

assassination of the richest man in the world.... YIKES

and yes... daddy was running for resident....


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...business-partner-toasting-Vladimir-Putin.html
https://bidenlaptopreport.marcopolousa.org/report_viewer/index.html#p=139

 

The most consequential thing about the Repub's investigation in to the Biden's so far is not the evidence it has revealed. Rather, it is despite a lack of evidence they have succeeded in creating the illusion of wrong doing simply by endlessly repeating unsubstantiated allegations.

 

The House will likely vote to impeach because tit-for-tat. Then one would hope the incessant whining about Trump's impeachments might abate...but sadly, I doubt it.

 

There are no errors in the report ""Hunter's lawyer, he had NO stake in that company"" yea buddy, yea can't argue with that...

What did Joe know and when did he know it... Where is the DOJ investigations?

This is the way shell companies are used to shuffle money around

https://bidenlaptopreport.marcopolousa.org

 

Nope.... it was even covered by Comer in his report.... you are not very good at trying to cover up the Biden empty shell game with the LLC's

https://oversight.house.gov/release...e-bidens-from-russia-kazakhstan-and-ukraine/
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Third-Bank-Records-Memorandum_Redacted.pdf

 

@Patricio Da Silva

You have stumbled and failed to show that the Biden crime family was not involved in shady foreign dealing...... the fact Joe was at the Baturina/Rakishev dinners.... not only implicates Joe's son as violating the FARA, it also implicates Joe Biden...

So rate your lame and untruthful posts as an

 

One the cover up and the looting has continued into the current administration.
Two Fact checkers generally consist of a leftist tool operating out of his mom's basement.
3 you don't need a vote for an inquiry you need a vote for an actual impeachment.determination.
4. Note quibbling over whether the amount of graft is 7 million or 10 million is an acceptance of at least 7 million in graft So an argument about well just how crooked is Joe isn't exactly going to work in your favor. It doesn't matter whether you stole a Lamborghini or a 1990 F-150 it is still grand theft auto

 

@Patricio Da Silva

Do you know why Hunter's business partner would be colluding with the Office of the VP on talking points that are to be released to the press about "no experience in the gas business" Hunter joining Burisma..

https://justthenews.com/accountabil...nt-effort-suppress-biden-family-stories-began
https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2023-03/NARA-Release-2_Supplement.pdf

 

In early September, Kevin told Breitbart that he wouldn’t launch an impeachment inquiry into Biden without a House vote. But he doesn't have the votes so..................

 

Okay, I will paraphrase. This is a taste of your own medicine.

 

There won't be an "impeachment", and even if there were there would be absolutely NO chance of "removal-from-office" in the Democratic Party-controlled Senate. It's amazing that Republicans don't grasp this!

Secretly, Democrats are probably hopping up and down, hoping that Republicans really are stupid enough to "die on this hill", but so far, NOTHING has surfaced beyond the realm of conjecture that Biden has done anything impeachable as PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. And remember, to my knowledge, Biden would have had to have committed "high crimes and misdemeanors" AS PRESIDENT in order for him to face Articles of Impeachment. What this tottering, half-witted mediocrity did as VICE-President doesn't count, unless I'm very much mistaken.

Besides, be honest, whether you're on the Left or the Right, would you REALLY want to see Joe gone, and then replaced in the White House by YOU-KNOW-WHO...?!

 

Yea when it doesn't happen it's hard to prove. And of course we now know it was all made up.

Nope else he would have listed the specific criminal charge the evidence supporting it in his report to the AG. He made no such charge. The AG and DAG and the OLC then looked and it and they found no charges for obstruction of justice so stop stating that obstruction of justice was found.

Nothing to do with Trump and his campaign and Russian collusion, you know it's purpose.

 

@conservaliberal

""There won't be an "impeachment", and even if there were there would be absolutely NO chance of "removal-from-office" in the Democratic Party-controlled Senate. It's amazing that Republicans don't grasp this!""

Oh we grasp it just fine..... we seen it with 2 Trump impeachments....it is called precedence....except the lame liberal chant is "Whataboutism" as they love to change the language..... funny the liberals don't want to play the game of "court of public opinion" like Pelosi did.... and Jack Smith is, and Big Fanni is, and Bragg is...

No conviction/removal needed by any ..... just throw crap against the wall and see what sticks.... no court, no pesky lawyers, no cross examinataion needed.... just get it out in front of the public and present your one sided theories and then the lefties on PF start regurgitating what fake CNN and fake WaPo tell them to saym without any verification or proof....