Skeptical Inquirer July/August issue on 9/11 Truth

Discussion in '9/11' started by Hannibal, Jul 6, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ok, so you get the first part of my analogy.

    Now, if Jeffrey Dahmer says the sky is blue, does that mean the sky is not blue, merely because he is mentally ill?
     
  2. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My potted plants are more relevant.

    Also, they don't call me a "paid shill" every time I open my mouth.
     
  3. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Seriously?
    [​IMG]

    I mean, do you really want me to post them all? There are endless lists of pictures like this when I google it.
     
  4. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My google image search yielded only 939,000 pictures, not millions. You must be a shill.
     
  5. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where I live the sky isn't always blue, so...yeah.
     
  6. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Seeking the truth has more validity than eating gov fed ****, and being kept in the dark and liking it.
     
  7. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Figures you would only comment on the most irrelevant part of my post.


    Looking to derail?
     
  8. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Aw c'mon...it was all irrelevant.
     
  9. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,727
    Likes Received:
    3,748
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Someone who was seeking the truth would not assume that truth and a report generated by the government were mutually exclusive.
     
  10. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    No proof?????? You'd think the thread would be flooded with proof after proof! LOL

    Pssst....Hey folks...it isn't because, well....THERE ISN'T ANY!!! LOLOL
     
  11. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Please please do! Maybe us stupid twoofers could gain something from all that proof. C'mon...don't you want to make us look stupid? SHOW 'EM!

    Ok...so according to you...there's ONE.
    A "hole".

    Please continue. I'll get my popcorn.


    I'm sure there are endless pics of nothing. Where's the plane? What did they do? Pick up all the little dime sized pieces of aluminum, weigh it all up and come up with 95%? So, it must be your contention that there wasn't anything bigger than a dime (that you have proof of), right?
     
  12. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,727
    Likes Received:
    3,748
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You can lie to yourself, but you can't lie in a forum where your own contradictions are there for people to read. You can't mock the claim that a portion of the engine was found 2000 feet from the main impact site, and also claim that there was nothing bigger then a dime found. You can't complain that the cockpit was found in the woods and not in the crater, and also complain that there was no debris larger then a dime. You've been shown many images of debris much larger then a dime. You've been shown testimony from witnesses that saw debris much larger then a dime. If you want to disbelieve them, fine.

    What's your alternative narrative. Where's your alternative evidence?

    Don't have any? Hmm. Sounds like your truth is more of a fantasy...
     
  13. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    You're somewhat correct. I actually meant something other than the plane's engine that, I guess bounced or something, almost a half mile away. I'm having problems understanding how the soft earth (that you guys claim that it was), the same earth that sucked the rest of the plane some 40 plus feet underground (as you guys claim), was apparently so hard it caused the plane's engine to land a half mile away.
    Soft earth inhaling planes, bouncing jet engines, no proof...it's all very confusing. Thanks.
     
  14. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If you're acknowledging it happened, what other proof do you need?

    It's like you're saying "I have a picture of a broken egg on my driveway," and then in the next post saying to us, "what proof do you have that dropping an egg on concrete will break it?"
     
  15. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,740
    Likes Received:
    1,803
    Trophy Points:
    113
    modern planes can open up a wormhole and pass right through buildings.

    Everyone knows that!

    We seen it on stargate!

    "AND FOX" real time on 911

    I have proven that how many times now.



    yer kiddin right?

    dropping an egg from an 1/8" on concrete wil not break it and an egg on concrete that is broken may have been run over by a car.
     
  16. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    which is of course what the 9/11 coincidence theorists are comfortable with.:mrgreen::-D
     
  17. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    what else? coincidence theorists are always looking to derail and and skipp the RELEVENT stuff.:mrgreen::-D
     
  18. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm asking you folks to explain how soft earth causes engines to bounce a half mile away AND suck in the rest of the plane 40 feet under. Seems inconsistent at best. Thanks.
    That IS "officially", the story, isn't it? Thanks.
     
  19. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    No, it's your strawman. Again.
     
  20. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It seems inconsistent because you have the facts wrong.

    You'd think after 10 years you'd at least know the basic facts.
     
  21. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    I know the facts don't align with the "official" BS story.

    One would think that after 10 years of lies and fairy tales generated by the "official" sources, they'd give up the ghost. Instead they pay shills to keep propping up the "story".
     
  22. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where does your official story make the claim of a definite percentage?

    Link, please.
     
  23. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LOL... Of course, they align much better with your theories of giant laser beams from space and thermite paint.
     
  24. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Well, the only way to explain an engine a half mile away from the rest of the crash site, means it either came off prior to impact, or the same soft earth that sucked down the rest of the plane down 40 plus feet, caused it to bounce half a mile away.
    Plane here (supposedly). Down 40 feet in soft earth here. Engine half a mile away over here. Does not compute.
     
  25. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Except it happened. The fact that it was improbable doesn't mean it didn't.

    The fact that you would deny that plane crashed there is insane. Purely insane.
     

Share This Page