Not surprising, given what we found out about the Philly Abortionist/Mass Murderer... Sounds like the same horrendous MO as the Philly Abortionist/Mass Murderer... At least this poor child damaged by the abortionist was awarded:
but abortion is sooo SAFE!! why it is TEN TIMES, nay a HUNDRED times safer for a woman than a nasty ol pregnancy! it is the caring choice, to allow women to choose to do this gracious and pleasant act! Only someone who REALLY REALLY loathes women would deny them this joyous and celebratory event in their lives! only a woman hating, Bible thumpin', slave trader would ever want to discourage this kind of jolly good time!
Evidence of this? Did someone tell her she would have to squat on a toilet? Or did she assume this? Or is this propaganda site making crap up again? I googled your story, and you know what I found? The only websites carrying your story are Christian and Catholic based sites. What a surprise.
What kind of sick individual would make use of the suffering of this poor woman at the hands of an monstrously incompetent "doctor" to make a jokey generalised comment against abortion? Seriously, what were you thinking?
Was at hotel in Clarksville, Indiana... Police Find 2 Newborns In Toilet July 26, 2011 -- Police say they found two newborns in a Clarksville, Ind., hotel bathroom.
This story is about a mentally retarded woman who had twins in a hotel bathroom because she didn't know she was pregnant. It has nothing to do with the OP.
It is funny that you used the word crap in your reply since that is what the aborted infants were treated like, a piece of crap to be flushed down the toilet.
The comment was not a joke but a commentary on the way certain people treat abortion, as a totally safe alternative to pregnancy.
there are people here that claim abortion is MUCH safer than pregnancy, and that pregnancy causes much more damage to a woman's body than abortions do. they just don't like hearing their own words repeated.
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/fl-district-court-of-appeal/1300763.html well here is one official record of the lawsuit being filed...they say the records have been sealed (as is so often the case in malpractice suits) I'll keep looking, I am sure with abortions being so safe and all that I won't find any kind of abuses anywhere else..
http://www.blackamericaweb.com/?q=articles/news/moving_america_news/25232 yeah, this is certainly prowomen...and so safe. I mean, really a perforated bowel vs stretch marks? I'll take the stretch mark! or better yet, use a condom or not have sex in the first place.
A doctor accused of malpractice in the 1987 death of a patient at Inglewood Women's Hospital testified in Norwalk Superior Court on Friday that the abortion he performed caused the patient's perforated uterus but that her death was caused by other unforeseen complications that arose after he left the hospital. Dr. Steven Pine said he recalled few details from Jan. 24, 1987, the day he performed the abortion on Belinda Byrd, a 37-year-old Los Angeles woman who was in her 19th week of pregnancy. But he said he believed that Byrd would not have been saved even if her condition had deteriorated before he left the hospital at the end of the work day. http://articles.latimes.com/1989-07-30/local/me-898_1_patient-care
man there are DOZENS of these cases across the country. Thank you to the OP for starting this thread, it gave me a push to look into this whole "Abortion is a hundred times safer than carrying a pregnancy to term"!! I'll post more this evening when I have more time!
I couldn't care less what some idiots on here might say. You're jokey sarcasm was a totally inappropriate response to the crimes reported in the OP. If you really wanted a serious discussion on how an extreme criminal act should impact the general questions of legal abortion (which I doubt), you went entirely the wrong way about it.
Medical malpractice is a problem, and not just related to abortion: http://www.qcc.cuny.edu/socialscien..._Moral_Climate_of_Health_Care/MALPRACTICE.htm
It makes perfect sense that it would. In reality there is a very very fine line between killing children in utero and killing newborns.
Actually it is. If you care to learn something on the topic seek out information on the incidence of complications with pregnancies and child deliveries vs. those with abortions. If you think that an incident, regardless of how repulsive it is, changes reality or statistical facts you are not only truly clueless but dishonest too. The fact that you continually forgo knowledge in favor of emotional hysteria, further underscores that you bring nothing but noise to the debate.
If you stopped attacking the messenger, and bothered to read the message, you would see the case #: But you have nothing, so all you can do is attack the messenger.
If you want to see death after death caused by abortion (above and beyond the poor innocent unborn babies killed, that is), check out this site: Cemetery of Choice