Tried contacting Shanksville sources, no dice

After 10 years, me thinks he needs more than luck.

 

I agree, it's going to take a miracle at this point for evidence that proves most of Flight 93 was buried to surface.

Hannibal can't produce this evidence.
Fangbeer can't produce this evidence.
DDave can't produce this evidence.
The girl who thought the WTC's were being scaled to a red barn can't produce this evidence.
Even you can't produce this evidence.

Looks like it's in God's hands now.

 

Gee, I hope she washed them.

 

I tried in vain to contact them as well some time ago. Another 9/11 related coincidence I guess. :/

 

Hasn't been "interested" in truth for literally years judging by the different forums he's visited (for YEARS...literally) on the subject. He's not concerned though....has "no interest". LOL!

 

Wow, you should try to do something about that.

You've made what, 8 threads on this topic and have gotten nowhere? I would have thought/hope that you'd have better things to do with your time but hey, if you wish to spend your life shouting at the rain, who am I to stop you.

It doesn't appear anywhere in the Commission report about a plane being buried or whatever so even your premise is faulty in my view. Not that any of it matters of course, everybody knows it crashed due to the struggle in the cockpit as was evidenced by the CVR, by the phone calls from the plane, etc... Man...it sucks to be on the other side of such monumental evidence...doesn't it? I'm sure by your 20th thread on this dead end topic, you will probably see the light....thousands of posts, endless hours typing the same tired phrases over and over and over....and you'll have nothing to show for it. Pretty sad. At least it would be if it were not so (*)(*)(*)(*) funny.

Keep up the good work.

 

I did though, didn't I? You should really **** about that moronic photo montage you submitted as evidence.

The only thing it proved was that you're easily assuaged by nonsense.

 

So we're just going to take your word for it you actually attempted to contact someone?

Like the guy at the bar, I'm quite dubious.

 

Yes, in 8 threads you skeptics have FAILED to produce any evidence proving most of Flight 93 had buried.

Right, I should have known from the start you guys were lying that you had evidence to debunk this conspiracy theory.

Why would they? Going by your logic, Flight 93 didn't produce an explosion and subsequent mushroom cloud after its alleged crash and the WTC 7 didn't collapse, cause it wasn't mentioned in the 9/11 Comm report.

Funny thing though, the 9/11 Comm report sorta did elude to the plane buried:

plow: To move or progress with driving force
Phrasal Verbs:
plow under
1. To cause to vanish under something piled up.

So you don't believe most of Flight 93 buried?

Not sure how the phone calls prove a crash, but to the rest, please answer this that DDave was afraid to answer:

If you were to stage a plane crash, would you stage the scene to make it look like there was:

1) no evidence
2) one piece of evidence
3) a little evidence
4) monumental evidence

More sad than you always responding to these thousands of posts of endless hours of typing of the same tired phrases over and over again?

 

Did you providence evidence most of 93 buried? Please post if you did.

Do you say that because whatshername royally embarrassed herself over it and has been pretty much MIA ever since?

You mean like how we have to take Hannibal's word he has photo and videos proving most of 93 buried?

You're ally Hannibal claims to have evidence to put this particular conspiracy to rest (among many other extraordinary claims) and you are more worried about my bar incident?

You have interesting priorities.

 

Fact: I have 3 posts on this thread; you have 34. You're the only one "always" responding and spending "endless hours of typing the same tired phrases over and over again." Hence this is your 8th thread on this topic and you're no more respected than you were at the beginning, no closer to achieving anything much less a new investigation, and generally just seen as a loon.

I wouldn't stage a plane crash (it takes someone of very suspect intelligence and a planet-sized amount of paranoia to assume someone else did by the way) but if I were going to stage it, I guess I'd choose option 4. Another inmaterial point made by you.

The phone calls show the intent of the passengers and the CVR proves what the passengers did; winning the first battle in the war on terror.

 

Glad you had the guts to answer unlike your other allies here.

So now that you admit you'd stage evidence to make it look like there was "monumental evidence" at the scene, how can you guarantee the "monumental evidence" you think is at the Shanksville scene wasn't all staged?

I know a good way to know, prove that the claim of where most of the evidence was (allegedly buried in the ground) was really where it was claimed to be.

I'll concede they couldn't have planted that much evidence in the ground before the alleged crash.

Btw, your buddy Hannibal claims he can. You guys can easily put a stop to this particular conspiracy right now. What are you waiting for?

 

AS I SAID in that thread, that bs study you posted was confusing (because it was a bs study mind you), and she obviously made an error on scaling to that barn. When I first looked at it I almost came to that conclusion, BECAUSE it was such a stupid effin' study (that you posted I remind you).

I'm more interested in why you thought it was valid, AND continue to bring it up to win the internets after the fact. That study was, and still is complete nonsense, and whoever created it must have completely pulled it from their backside.

 

Even the grotesque blogger didn't give up so easily.

Buckle down and do the research. As I said, maybe your buddy from the bar can help out.

 

Why is that blogger "grotesque"?

Hannibal, are you prepared to post this alleged evidence you claim to have, that you claim they have shared with many, and finally put to rest this conspiracy theory that nothing buried to rest?

yes or no?

 

Because of it's actions. It's disgusting.

Don't give up, contact the source.

 

Do some research on him. There's plenty of ammo out there.

Still not sure why you should care personally though.

 

Because:

The plane was tracked to the crash site.
The witnesses saw the plane before the crash.
The CVR reveals a struggle in the plane
The phone calls prove the passengers caused the struggle

All of that blows your theory out of the water so high that it is now in orbit pal.

But wait, theres more!!!


The DNA found at the scene was there too soon after the plane took off unless you wish to make some bizarre claim about passengers getting killed at another site the same morning (It took off at 8:42 and crashed at 10:03 AM).

You'd have us believe that sometime in the 81 minutes of the flight's existence...

the plane took off,
landed,
the passengers were summarily executed, their remains burned,
then the plane was then aloft once more--remember people saw the plane--then crashed in SW PA. So you can't wiggle out of that; there was a plane there that people saw.
Meanwhile, some super secret unit was planting the passenger's remains.

Doesn't even begin to pass any sort of logic test.

I don't prove someone else's claim; yours or Hanny's. Hanny is 100% right on this topic as per usual so I'll defer to him on his end of it. On your end of it; I don't what to say....3 months later you're still talking about percent of the airframe that is buried. The world long ago stopped caring (if it ever did in the first place).

At any rate, staging of evidence of flight 93 has been disproven, ruled out, and you've been shown the error in your theory yet again.

 

Really? What they do?

Still a no? Got it.

 

A blip on a radar? Wow.
Yeah, the few witnesses described the crash angle dramatically different from the official story (90 deg vs 40 deg) and Lee Purbaugh described it at even a lower angle than the official story. So much for witnesses.
CVR and phones calls don't prove a plane crashed.

Um yeah, right. NEXT!

Dude, they didn't start collecting debris and alleged remains until TWO DAYS AFTER the alleged crash!!!

Do you believe him when he says he has photo and video proving most of 93 buried? yes or no

Funny, I bet most of the world doesn't even know the claim that most of the plane buried.

Maybe in your delusional world it has.

 

Still changing my answer to suit your agenda? Got it.

 

If it's not a yes, then it's clearly a no.

What's my "agenda"? Your's is becoming pretty clear.


And you "forgot" to answer: Really? What they do?

 

"What they do"? Which "they" do you refer to?

I answered nether 'yes' nor 'no' to your silly, set up question. My answer was: contact the source, which you clearly haven't done. If you are so inept to do this simple task, there is little hope for you finding the evidence.

Good luck!

 

You call it a blip, I call it a nail in your coffin.

So you agree there was a plane seen by "witnesses"--plural. So what happened to the plane if all of the wreckage was planted? Did any of the "witnesses" see the plane pull out of the angles YOU reported?

Well....now you have to account for the plane you admit was there. Lets hear it....what happened to that aircraft if it didn't crash?

No, the witnesses you admit saw the plane do. What the CVR and the phone calls do serve as are logical links in the chain of evidence (Logic is something smart people use to prove 9-11 conspiracy loons are full of ****. Works every time). They all cease after the plane crashes marking a definite time when the lives of the patriots on board and the terrorists they were fighting add died when Flight 93 crashed in Somerset County, PA.

You have no idea how lame you sound.

Really...they began investigating immediately, dozens (if not hundreds) of Law Enforcement personnel on the scene. Yet as the conspiracy loon's story goes; somehow DNA and wreckage were sneaked past these people.
Didn't happen.

Who?

For once I would agree with you. Only those interested in self-aggrandizement (aka twoofers) are concerned with such meaningless trivia.

I guess all you have left are emoticons....how sad.

I reduced most posters to having nothing left but cartoons so you shouldn't feel too bad. Take your defeat like a man.

 

He aint got Jack ****. His objective was to go off into a long drawn out tangent to derail the thread.

As pointed out, if there were any (non-offiical) photos of the crash site, they would have been posted.

We all know the feds frown on Citizens gathering info (video & photos)and distributing it to the general public. It stifles their ability to tell their BS stories when info is floating around that contradicts the official BS version.