I just informed everyone how they can find what the man said. I'll let them do so for themselves. The highjackers comment is a shorter route than playing your never ending words games. I don't actually know if there were or weren't hijackers on all flight, or even if all of the flight existed in the first place, and the "official" providers of credible information are only a fantasy so, we're left with only speculation and disinformation entities such as yourself to go on.
What the man said? You made this claim: What man said that? So if there were no highjackers to 'recruit', why did the powers that created this narrative not make them Iraqis? I'm not playing word games. I'm asking you to provide sources for your claims. You are avoiding the topic.
The topic at hand is your claim that: Why can you not simply post a source and stop playing word games?
Noted that, once again the 'truthers' can not back up their claims, and they can only parrot what other people say. You made your claim as fact. Only when you got cornered did you cry that it was 'only your opinion'. The more you hurl insults, the more everyone can see your lack of supporting evidence.
I said it was my opinion, several posts ago. Who's doing the crying here? Sounds like you are big boy.
You tried to distract from your claim. Why don't you simply support it, instead of changing your tune? Since you now claim it is your opinion, we can rest assured you have no proof. You simply have faith that it is true. That's a very cult-like attitude, don't you think?
Ahhhh! Word of the day..."cult". That must be in this week's bullet points. Nope...I don't agree. I know what I saw and heard and it has been committed to memory. I can agree that you are completely lying about having been at the 93 crash site, and the rest of your ridiculous assertions pertaining to it's burial. One thing is weird though. Your obsession with defending all that is official about 9/11, for years now, across many forums. Almost like it's a job or something.
I never claimed I was at the 93 crash site. Don't include me in your delusions. This is the only forum I regularly post in. I'd ask you to show evidence of the bolded claim above, but we both know you can't.
You didn't? You talked to the workers then, didn't you? Some BS like that. You can't prove 93 was buried, and what's worse, you can't even admit that much. Under such strict orders you can't stray off the "official" bullet point at all huh? Must be frustrating.
You really have a hard time keeping facts straight. It would be easier if you just told the truth. I provided sources for everything I claimed. Will you ever?
You did no such thing. Why can't defenders of the "official" BS story just admit their failings once in a while?
I provided direct contacts and sources. You refused to look at them, and now you hand wave and pretend they didn't exist. Pathetic. Why can't 'truthers' ever tell the truth?
I told you pal, as did others, that your "sources" don't respond to inquiry. I can't look at what isn't available.
You have to actually inquire of them before they can respond. You can't see evidence you close your eyes to.
anyone whos position requires cited sources typically beckons to authority rather than evidence because they are not capable of properly processing said evidence as shown in the OP and figgering it out for themselves. nothing new SOP
