Zimmermans Bond Revoked

Yeah right. If his wife is still breathing air right now after she got his bail revoked, hes not violent at all. I actually have never heard of violent Hispanic Whites.

 

But this is exactly why many of us said a month ago his first court appearance proved him to not be credible. About 90% of his defense rests on his credibility. The eyewitnesses are at best a wash and the medical evidence on the whole does not support Z's claim.

 

Actually, I thought it was probably something you picked up from watching Lifetime.

You know - idiot savant... that sort of thing.

 

That is not "refusing" to meet them anywhere, what an asinine statement. He was specifically attempting to meet them and in the process of walking towards the direction they were expected to be coming from.

 

It wasn't an old passport it was a new one.

 

It isn't trolling. I'm highlighting how you made a false claim about T. If you don't like it the best way to avoid it is to not make BS claims you can't support.

 

What are you talking about.. So the Z deal was to get convicted of purjury in court.. I don't understand..

 

absolutely. Z's entire defense rests on his credibility which is probably why, after looking at the evidence, O'Mara decided he'd need help by recruiting another higher profile attorney.

 

No. they were BOTH old passports. The last time Z got a new passport was 8 years ago.

 

She didn't get his bail revoked. He did that on his own... and he shot an unarmed teenager who wasn't breaking the law.

 

Wrong, he only attempts to prove it at a preliminary hearing to have the charges dismissed, and then by a preponderance of the evidence. Once it goes to trial the burden shifts to the prosecution to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. And the evidence is FAR short of beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman was not acting in self defense.

 

So it has nothing to do with the evidence in the case, only if he lied about about some small stuff that does not matter. 90%.. well, we know where your biasness is. Not to mention, your ignorance on how our justice system works. In a case where there is almost no evidence, credibility will become a large factor in the case. However, in this case, there is plenty of physical evidence to make an argument so credibility will only be a very small portion of what decides this case.

 

LOL. Seriously, are you Thuglovers under the impression fists aren't weapons? When you say unarmed, it sounds so dumb.

 

Wrong. This is an issue most lay people get wrong.

I'll help you out. The prosecution has the burden of proving that A murdered B.

B has the burden of a preponderance of the evidence that they murdered A in self-defense.

In this case, Zimmerman has already confessed to killing Martin. Now, he has to prove it was self-defense.

 

You figured out the facebook scam. Why can't you get on clue on this martin thing.

 

Alright I'm going to have to read up on this whole passport thing when more accurate information is available. I don't think I understand what is going on here.

 

I have to agree. The fact he brought on West after the first stage of discovery says he needs some help. However, since West agreed it could be argued the evidence is not that (*)(*)(*)(*)ing because West would not take on a sure loser UNLESS he was guaranteed to get paid a good amount. I have feeling Omara said "Don't worry about the case file, just look at the rate of donations pouring in. I'll give you half."

 

Here's a clue...



There needs to be a trial.

 

Why argue it when the Judge tossed it out?

 

actually, since he already has put in a plea of innocence, the prosecution has to prove that Z murderd T and that it was not self defense.

 

The passport turned in before Z got bail was set to expire anyways and it was his oldest passport that he thought he lost in 2004. He applied for a new passport on the basis of losing his old one back then.

The only reason I could see him lying back then is if he was facing some criminal action where he may want to leave the US for a while.

 

Wrong. You are confusing statutory SYG law with common law self defense. But you're not educated in the law so I won't hold it against you.

 

I see, so by your own admission he didn't apply for it after the incident with Martin. Way back in 2004 ? He may have temporarily forgot that he had it. MAY HAVE being the operative words. As for the money in the pay pal account, I don't know the circumstances of that any more than you do. It's up to the judge to decide if Zimmerman was hiding anything. Not you or me.

 

Wrong.

 

Attempting to kill or cause serious bodily harm to someone without cause is against the law.