Christianity is a lie, since Adam wouldn't need/have a bellly button.

There is strong evidence for what is more often called the "mitochondrial eve", who would have lived around 200,000 years ago, and it appears that all living people today are direct descendents.

It is a bit hard to tell what our LEP friend is talking about, with his mixing of fact, fantasy, opinion and garbled English.

 

To ignore something needs an intention to do so. To be an ignorant needs a decision for this lifestyle. "Your problem is not my problem" is for example a standard of this lifestyle. "To be ignorant" means someone is ignorant in a special case - "to be an ignorant" means someone made ignorance to a stable part of his own character.

http://youtu.be/yB-zWmu3l5c

 

Are you sure you should speak in this way way about me, enemy mine? Do me the favor please to put me on your ignore list.

http://youtu.be/EWruBwPNBOs

 

In general your answer shows to me that you don't have a good feeling for the difference between an orginal and your own manipulations. Take another name instead Eve if you have a psychological problem with the name "Eve", because you learned to hate Christians on no reason to do so.

http://youtu.be/niS4Emp64q8

 

Tell me something about the current climate change. Tell me what you could know about and how you learned to change something in your own behavior what's minimizing this risk. Then try to tell me again that ignorance has nothing to do with intentions.

http://youtu.be/21yzXbPGhWc

 

What on earth has climate change got to do with whether ignorance is by definition intentional?

 

I'm defining nothing - never.

http://youtu.be/TjMw0kEw6B0

 

So you're taking back your comment that "to be an ignorant needs intentions"?

 

Be an ignorant or not - that's not my problem. I love my people - and my people: that's Eve, the most beautiful woman with a wonderful belly-button - that's also mother Mary and Joseph and their most beautiful baby Jesus and that's everyone who is born of water and spirit. Maybe I made a mistake when I tried to speak with atheists. That's not my world.

http://youtu.be/ych7uO1dER0
http://youtu.be/Z0d1dFD_xIE

 

Ok, im just gonna post, cause if i don't Anobsitar will take over and lord knows i cant let him. First off, to all you nay sayers of the lord, oh you silly nay sayers, why push us so vehemently? You have intelligent people here, but by using various tactics you refuse to let go, you push us into corners. Also about this, if you say god isn't real, try to think back to before Humans and the Earth, before the big bang and the singularity, before matter even and ask yourself "How was that all created?"

 

I think you are in a very poor position to be be giving English lessons.

 

There are questions that have entertained mankind for generations and no doubt always will. Concocting an "answer' and deciding to believe in it is not satisfactory, to me.

As for how was it all created...That assumes it was "created'.
And assuming there is a god just makes things worse, far as Im concerned.
Then we get, well, now was god created, and how did it get so darn smart.
And, of course, what kinda magic does it use.

This assumption -assumption stuff does not suit me.

 

Well, assumption is all we got, we assume evolution in Humans, we assume the big bang, if you really look at it, God is really the only logical answer as to actual appearance, if it wasnt created how was it created? Use your vocabulary skills! If it wasnt created we wouldnt be here! We are here, and so is the universe...which means it was created!

 

I have thought about that on a number of occasions, and there are a couple of scientific theories that sound plausible, but eventually I just decided that 'I dont know' is actually not a bad answer.

 

"ignorance" is a latin word

http://youtu.be/XQyezc8o2rY

 

No, I said the routines have meaning, not the creatures themselves. I thought you were big into semantics?

What is the intent behind the FSM and the IPP routines?

 

What on earth makes you think that I hate Christians? Have you lost all contact with reality? I proudly proclaim the mantle of Christianity as my source of well being.

 

You are in a poor position to be giving me English lessons.

Do you have a problem accepting that self-evident fact?

 

Descendants

Anyhoo, genetics is none too kind to religious notions of creation. The creationists are forced to either move God back to some initial creation a lot LOT longer than 6,000 years ago or ignore mountains of evidence to maintain their view. It helps, I suppose, that they tend not to understand or even be much aware of a majority of that evidence..

Adam and Eve cannot have existed; not with the biblical genealogies attached to them. I think the author of usbible.com is right in thinking of them as an older use for Virgo and Bootes than were Mary and Joseph. There again you see common motifs. There is a 'fruit' in the sky near Virgo (Corona Borealis, I want to say it was), and the serpent, Serpens Caput, is situated right below her as well (the same trio became Joseph, Mary and the dragon (a.k.a. King Herod, going by the gospel nativity stories).

http://www.usbible.com/sin/adam_and_eve.htm
The constellation Virgo is facing Bootes the herdsman, as if to be offering him fruit. The constellation Serpens is just below her feet. By the way the constellations are positioned, Virgo is leading Bootes down when they cross the fall equinox.

 

w
How was God created?

You just introduced a problem of infinite complexity to your arguement.

The Watchmaker requires a Watchmaker's Watchmaker.

Your arguement is self-defeating.

 

Sure they have, for all intents and purposes.

P.S. People need to quit messing up the quoting system.