Impeached former President to swear in NYC Mayor

Since neither Nixon or Clinton was ever convicted of sexually abusing any women or of committing any felonies that is of course conjecture.

We do know that Nixon attempted to subvert our democratic process in order to further his political power.

And of course he was also a sleazy, foul mouthed racist.

"The Italians, of course, just don't have their heads screwed on tight. They are wonderful people, but . . ." he trailed off, adding later: "The Jews are just a very aggressive and abrasive and obnoxious personality."

ad_icon

During another conversation with his personal secretary, Rose Mary Woods, Nixon expresses doubt about the opinion of William P. Rogers, his secretary of state, about blacks.

"Bill Rogers has got somewhat - and to his credit it's a decent feeling - but somewhat, sort of, a sort of blind spot on the black thing because he's been in New York," Nixon said. "He says, well, 'They are coming along, and that after all, they are going to strengthen our country in the end because they are strong physically and some of them are smart.' So forth and so on.

"My own view is I think he's right if you're talking in terms of 500 years," Nixon said. "I think it's wrong if you're talking in terms of 50 years. What has to happen is they have to be, frankly, inbred. And, you just, that's the only thing that's going to do it, Rose."

And I would love to hear your version of what the whacky Vince Foster murder accusations were really all about.

I am sure that it will be very imaginative.

 

Won't somebody please think of the children?

 

Which makes Clinton Oral Orifice escapades OK... Gotcha, Jeff.

 

Who initiated relationship, you asked? What could have Monica done, besides winking at the President?

 

Oh yeah, I forgot; it's not proper for a women to initiate a sexual relationship.

 

He should have just blown Clinton himself. At least then he'd have proof.

 

ROFL he was held in contempt of court for it!!!! He enter a false affidavit into a court proceeding, that is prima facie evidence of perjury for which he recieved legal sanction by the court and had his license to practice law suspended by the Arkansas Bar.

I'm sorry was Nixon invited to swear in the new mayor of NY? Did the Republicans defend him and insure he was not removed from office? Was he put on a pedestal afterwards?

You are proving my point stop digging your hole.

I ask you first because I believe you don't really know and believe some old cliche'd crap about. So briefly explain what the legal issues were in the Foster case.

- - - Updated - - -

No it is just a specious point.

 

What I was speaking about was the whacky far right claims that the Clinton's murdered Vince Foster.

You know- 'The Clinton Body Count'?

 

Yes I know I am asking you if YOU know what were the legal issues surrounding Foster and his death? There were very serious legal issues there. Yes I know the MSM kept it diverted to the murder theories so that the true legal issue would be discarded with it, but there were in fact some very serious legal issues.

 

What I was speaking about was the whacky far right claims that the Clinton's murdered Vince Foster.

You know- 'The Clinton Body Count'?

If you want to talk about whatever legal issues you want to regarding Vince Foster, I look forward to your imaginative account.

 

Trust me they deserve each other.

 

It is proper, of course. In case involving the president of the US it's highly improbable, however. And you probably know it, too.

 

I miss the days when the biggest complaint about our President was he lied about BJs.

 

Where did you get the idea that was the biggest complaint about Clinton, far from it.

 

Yes I know, I asked you about the legal issues surrounding Foster and challenged you that you don't know what the real issues were. There were very serious legal issues involving him and Hillary both before and after his death. There was a very serious investigation into very serious matters it wasn't just a bunch of conspiracy theories about who may have been involved in nefarious acts. To try is discount it as just that ignores those very serious matters and shows a lack of knowledge about the matter.

 

HOW DUMB!

The blow job was NONE of our business to begin with. It was between two consenting adults, and neither complained!

I think Reagan's lies about providing arms to the Contras and to Iran was a MUCH GREATER and more significant reason to impeach him. . .but then again, he was a Republican!

Get over it! President Clinton is one of the most liked and most respected President in the last 50 years. . .and all your efforts to try to bring back the CRAP of the "impeachment circus" will not change that!

I find it so amusing when you guys are drooling at the mouth over stupid, non-issues!

 

It is when it is a government official engaging in a sexual act with a government employee in a federal office while that government employee is on the job and is receiving special benefits and favors as a result. It is when the same person is sued in federal court for molesting another employee and by the law signed into effect by Clinton himself is compelled to give testimony to ANY employee with which they engage in sexual activity.

Why do you believe bosses should be able to use their power to solicit and recieve sexual favors from subordinate employees? I thought liberals believed in protecting women in the workplace from such bosses.

Is Reagan swearing in the NYC mayor? Did he commit a crime in a federal court? Did he sexually molest and threaten subordinate workers?

Exactly my point, there is nothing to respect about the man especially his treatment of women over whom he had power, why do you admire such a man?

So in your view it's OK for bosses to lie in court about the sexual harassment and creating hostile workplaces for subordinate workers, if a subordinate worker sues them for a sexual assault it's OK for them to lie under oath? And the man who does so desires to be honored and respected?

ROFL he can't be impeached the question is why does the left adore such a sleazebag abuser of women?

I didn't select him to swear in the NYC mayor, I find it absurd you guys didn't send him back to Arkansas in shame and disdain.

 

Ridiculous! Obviously, miss blue dress didn't need to be "intimidated" or "bought up" to "keep her boss happy!"

IF she had wanted to start a sexual harassment suit. . .it would have been HER choice, and her boss would have been judge as in any other case of sexual harassment. It had NOTHING to do with his performance as POTUS. . .unlike other "incidents" that happened under Nixon and Reagans and were DIRECTLY related to an overreach of their power and into national security.

Now. . .if you want to try to bring back that very old, very silly "indiscretion," thinking that it might damage Hillary's chances at the presidency in 2016. . .I believe you should think twice!

Because, obviously, Hillary's attitude and reaction to this unsavory, painful, but very PERSONAL incident was PERFECT, and demonstrated what a strong, focused, and intelligent woman she is.

By the way. . .Polls on Bill Clinton favorability ratings continues to show that more and more people appreciate him. The latest by Gallup poll was in 2012 and was up to 69%.

So. . .obviously, you are in the small minority giving a damn about "the little blue dress!"

As so often, you are on the wrong side of the issue!

 

Hahahahahahahaaa! That's one of the funniest things I've read here in ages........ and there's some truth to it also.......hahahahaaa.......

 

Sadamie, you do realize Monica was young enuf to be Clinton's daughter?! And his intern.

If that had been YOUR daughter? He took advantage of her stupidity, her vulnerability, her infatuation w/him...... of course, she knew what she was doing, but he, in his position of power, who he was - he took advantage of her.

Hillary most likely knew all along what he was doing w/Monica, just like she knew about Jennifer Flowers, Kathleen Wiley, Paula Jones, Juanita Broderick, etc etc etc.. but in a marriage of convenience, you turn a blind eye to it to secure your own future.....

No wonder her 'attitude and reaction' to the situation was 'perfect'.....

 

Not talking about Lewinsky being intimated DUH.........but she did receive special treatment and rewards for granting sexual favor to the boss which he solicited. That creates a hostile work environment for all the other workers.

What on earth are you talking about Lewinsky was not going to sue, what she did do was threaten him to get her a better job at higher pay else she might spill the beans.

It was Paul Jones who was suing him are you really that uninformed about this?

Specious, it had to do with him as a boss, a supervisor in the workplace and his committing felonies when sued by a former employee whom he sexually harassed and molested.

It showed a woman more concerned with her own political future who participated in the attempted cover up and intimidation of the women he was involved with. And it shows a fool.

As I have said the mainstream media has cooperated fully with the coverup of the truth about this man hence the beliefs expressed here that he was impeached because of a blowjob and that it was just a personal matter between him and Hillary.

I give a damn about bosses who sexually harass employees and sexually molest employees and Presidents who so dishonor the office to which they are elected by their reprehensible personal behavior in that office with federal workers and then committing felonies in a federal court and a federal grand jury.

Why don't you?

And supporting bosses who sexually molest their workers and sexually harass them and then when sued in a federal civil rights lawsuit commit perjury and obstruction of justice in an attempt to deny an employee their rightful day in court is the right side of the issue?

So you're OK with bosses who behave as such?

And speaking of Lewinsky, he set her up for a term in a federal prison when he coerced her, this young naive infatuated girl, into participating in the perjury and obstruction of justice. All to protect his own political arse. He then plotted with Sidney Blumenthal on the side to smear her as a crazy stalker in case she refused to go along and instead tell the truth.

Yeah what a great guy you so love and support.

 

I suggest you take a good look out there in life, this wouldn't be the first time a subordinate became infatuated with her boss, and provided sexual favors. And I seriously doubt, Clinton was the first Pres either. Unless I miss my guess, he won't be the last.

You may not like this behavior, fair enough, but to stick your head in the sand, and blow this issue completely out of proportion, is something you have accomplished well.

 

What always fascinated me about the Lewinsky case was the fact that it came on the heels of Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas affair. It happened at a time when women were making significant strides, and public awareness of sexual harassment peaked. Remember the Year of the Woman? The irony is incredible.

 

Oh boy- way to twist the facts. Do you have anything to contribute?

 

I stand by that. I know of no dick that Bill has sucked.