WHO warns HIV 'exploding' among gay men.>>MOD WARNING<<

please define anti-gay

IMO, anti-gay would be something like ..........all homosexuals should die

anti-gay is not ................govt should not be in the business of marriage or, govt should not force a non essential business to serve homosexual weddings

if you believe the latter to be "anti-gay" then you must also accept the homosexual position as "anti-Christian" and "anti-Constitution"

I would appreciate that you also comment about "anti-Christian" posts and threads

 

And the biggest reason I haven't been posting much here anymore. The sheer stupidity is mind-boggling. One of these days, maybe it will change.

 

maybe some day we all will be mandated to succumb to the homosexual movement and their agenda. But, until that day, differing opinions are still allowed in this country

 

I don't want to see ANYONE die from AIDs. But the only way to stop it is to pump money into aids research, and getting the word out to EVERYONE that unprotected sex is bad. If gay people are at higher propensity, then tailor such education towards them and focus on areas of the country it is higher. Condoms are great, and I think everyone should be wearing them.
The problem I see is that this thread (and others like it) make it more about being gay, and less about educating those at risk.

As for help, perhaps if that 'help' didn't come with such condescension and (in many cases) malice towards the very fact that they are gay, perhaps they might be more open to the idea.

Very true. Absolutely true. See what i mean? Around and around we go. Pedophilia is an attraction to pre-pubescent CHILDREN. Their is no sexual orientation.
Their are specific terms for specific attractions

Not once in any of that do i see the words homosexual or heterosexual.

 

There is no such thing as a monogamous gay man. Now he may BECOME monogamous at some point in life... but young gay men wouldn't even know they're gay unless they become sexually active.

While forty yo men entering a monogamous marriage may indeed reduce 2 men's chances of contracting HIV+ -- their marriage doesn't do a thing to help 20 yo men... the ones MOST at risk for AIDS.

From cdc.gov

This is what infuriates me about most gay men and their supporters -- the one and only focus is 'gay rights' -- especially gay marriage. Talking about AIDS is considered an attack on gays. They do the gay community no favors by ignoring this subject and actually do them harm by stupid arguments like gay marriage will 'fix' the AIDS epidemic.

Ignorance and downright denial spreads AIDS. The young have the first... the over 30 crowd has the second.

It's a shame.

 

Anti - against

pro - for.

If you have a problem with someone STRICTLY because they are (gay, straight, christian, muslim, tall, short, fat, skinny, black, white, blue eyes, large feet) then you have serious problems and I will always fight against that.

It's a persons actions in this world that define who they are. Nothing more.

 

you need to stop that common sense. This is not the first thread about the rise in HIV among homosexual men. The info is out there, condoms are cheap yet here we are.

When anyone who is deemed "anti gay" asks a simple question to the homosexual posters like; "what form of messaging might work to get out the word?" is posed, the posters are attacked by the demographic they are concerned about. (things that make you go hmm)

look at it logically

a: if you do this...............you might die
b: if you slip on this, you won't die

with numbers still rising, it's obvious that education isn't working because honestly, who doesn't know that unprotected sex could harm you?

As a marketing guy, I say it's time for shock messaging and hitting the homosexual men over the head with photos of infected and sickly men and include an in your face message.

Here's the thing "cube". Most of the people here who you and others wrongly label as "anti gay" are the same people who cherish life, are pro-life and tend to be the first to donate and want to help save lives.

How you choose to have sex is not a qualifier/disqualifier for your inalienable right to life.

 

Nobody attacks anyone who brings up these statistics to raise health awareness. That is completely absurd. The problem is that many use these statistics as an excuse to belittle gay people, deny them rights, and treat them as sub-par human beings. That is the idea that is attacked, not the statistics.

 

Alright, I can understand that. Like I said before, perhaps you should look at how you frame your topics then, because they don't exactly scream 'compassionate'.

Like I said earlier, Left handed people make up 4% of the population, yet 40% of schizophrenics, yet I don't see/hear a peep about fixing that problem from anyone.

I'm am fully on board with helping those in need, especially when it comes to educating those who need it (and I don't really see much advertising for Aids anymore, focused on anyone. Now a days its Breast Cancer, which gets all the hype)

 

what in heavens name are you talking about? Please show me one poster in this forum who applauds that more homosexuals are becoming infected?

Disagreeing with marriage because you have gay sex has nothing to do with the inalienable right to life.

You just perpetuated a false talking point that is used on this forum

- - - Updated - - -

I'm not anti breast cancer awareness because it hit home. But, you can't go anywhere without seeing a pink ribbon, that's true.

wrt my posts, I get responses and lots of hits don't I?

 

But when you call a heterosexual who molested prepubescent boys(pedophilia) a homosexual, you of course are going to be corrected.

There is of course only one obvious reason that you guys keep doing it, and nobody is fooled by it.

 

What are you talking about? I never said anyone on this forum applauds that more gay people are becoming infected. Where did you get that nonsense from?

That has absolutely nothing to do with my post. What does the right to life have to do with anything I am talking about?

I have no idea what you think I said, but nothing you just wrote even addresses my post in the slightest. I honestly have no idea what you are trying to say. I am responding to this concluding comment in the OP:

"The problem is the far left and gay community attacks anyone who provides these facts on the ease that gay men contract AIDS because their religion of homosexuality matters more than the science."

I responded by saying that nobody attacks people for providing these facts...

 

This is a strange talking point. So someone who has a sexual attraction to little boys, but not little girls, is not a homosexual? Little boys are still sexually male, aren't they? A male who is attracted to another male sexually is still a homosexual, isn't he?

 

No, he's a pedophile. It isn't a talking point, it's a medical definition.

No

 

Let's see it.

Your say-so isn't convincing.

 

There is no 'solving' the issue of homosexuality. The bigger picture tells us societies have rejected then accepted then rejected homosexuals throughout history. The cyclical nature of that phenomena is a good indicator there may come a time when gays fall out of favor again. Think of the possible things that could start that ball moving in our country.

- The election of a closet homophobe to the oval office who works as hard taking away gay rights as Barack Obama has worked to hand them out.

- The selection of anti-gay SC judges to replace the black robed relics who have to be retiring someday

- An explosion of AIDS in America as young men being infected now... become sicker.

- A decade worth of statistics on gay marriage showing the divorce rate is 90% and monogamy is .2%

I am not anti-gay, but I'm a realist. Gay is 'in' now -- but it may not always be that way. There will always be a segment of our society that sits back and waits until it's their turn to define 'normal.'

 

I'm not anti-breast cancer awareness, I'm pro-cancer awareness. Regardless of what part of the body it's on. But Boobs sell more then colons do.

You do. Then again, Everyone slows down for a car crash.....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronophilia

It's like saying 'Diet' coke. Their is nothing dietary about pop, yet they put Diet on it so people think that it's somehow healthier then regular coke. It's called Association.

Homosexuality has nothing to do with pedophilia, but some use both terms to create an association that isn't there to demonize homosexuality.

Homosexuality has nothing to do where one puts a penis. Some gay people don't even have a penis. Some have one and never put it anywhere near another male bum.

 

The gay population probably doesn't cheat in higher percentages than the straight population, which is as I remember...after 20 years of marriage about 70%

 

A more accurate comparison: Left-handed people don't choose to be left handed, but they do choose to write with their left hand. They could just as easily choose to write with their right hand, even though that would be uncomfortable.

Likewise, gay people don't choose to be gay, but they do choose who to have sex with. They could just as easily choose to have sex with the opposite sex, even though that would uncomfortable.

 

Women have no penis but they are not the center of discussion when it comes to homosexuals dying of AIDS.

So lets cut the crap and stick to the subject.

Homosexual men engage in risky sex and that's how they get HIV.

 

Which I never did. I called him what he is. A homosexual pedophile. Please read more carefully.

Accuracy? We know that annoys the far left yes.

 

Does writing with the left hand make them schizo?

Not to my knowledge.

But men choosing to engage in risky sex is spreading HIV.

And that is a choice that homosexuals choose to make.

 

So do straight men.

 

Except that the parasites at the WHO are not warning us about an in increase of HIV among normal men.

They see a problem with gays and spelled it out in their report.