I shouldn't even respond but here it is: What are you talking about? All I did was remind of the hypocrisy of both sides which make this entire sorted discussion and mockery of feigned concern.
Nope, you directed it straight at women who were "complaining about Trump and ALLEGED sexual Tryst allegations". Let's review shall we? With all of the BrooHaha about Women's Liberation, sexual freedom and what not, why are females complaining about Trump and ALLEGED sexual Tryst allegations? I mean seriously, when Willy-Wonka, aka William Jefferson Clinton went through similar allegations, most of you females could not careless, so why the sudden switch in your demeanor?
Your desperate need to divert by resurrecting sluts of yore is amusing. Unfortunately for the current skank, that was then, this is now, and there has been enormous progress as of late in the moral realm. Decades old depravity just does not serve as the distraction you crave. Yes, when Trump is on record as boasting that his celebrity licenses him to violate women, one might rejoin, "Oh yeah! Well..., well..., well... Warren Harding had a mistress!", but that is hardly exculpatory in the current sordid matter, now is it?
It is in the sense that you're a hypocrite which is always a current subject. Bill Clinton, and all of the Kennedy boys used the WH like a brothel while they were in office and you looked the other way. He's not having an affair NOW, while he's in office, so it's immaterial. "Decades old"? 2006 was over a decade ago, so why are you bringing it up now?
In your desperate diversion from current events, why do you need to pretend that was the case? Your presumption concerning my reaction to your fanciful scenario is hardly to be regarded seriously. It would approximate my citing your "looking the other way" in the matter of Warren Harding's mistress. The recent revelations of October, 2016 hush money, during his presidential campaign, is why it's au courant and newsworthy. Surely, you can't be insisting that the circumstances of any incumbent president seeking $20 million in damages from a private citizen in 2018 should be censored? Not to mention the applicable context of the public's moral standards in 2018.
I could not have stated this any better. Mind you, when I first read it I laughed and am still laughing:
Liberals have no moral standards. I never suggested censoring any one. How is it a diversion? It isn't. Bill's still riding the Lolita Express. And since it was consensual sex 12 years ago, it doesn't even need defending and I'm sure they won't need a black light and a steam cleaner when Trump leaves office.
The "liberals" festering in your noggin have nothing to do with Trump's current scandal. It has recently come to the public's attention that a porn star was paid $130,000 a month before the last presidential election, reputedly to buy her silence regarding her sexual relationship while Trophy Wife #3 was pregnant. Election campaign laws may have been broken. She is now accused by Trump of violating their agreement and she is facing a $20 million law suit for spilling the beans. Try to focus upon the current matter. Fanciful tales of yesteryear do not serve your need for avoidance. Yes, you can protest that Trump was already acknowledged as a slut before the election, but the specifics of this raunchy episode, the timing, the legal and financial aspects, are why it is of public concern, and a newsworthy topic throughout the news media.
Red states = pornography loving perverts: https://www.salon.com/2016/05/21/th...lead_the_nation_in_same_sex_porn_consumption/ http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/stevenwaldman/2009/02/the-red-states-porn-habit.html Republican sex scandals: https://www.ranker.com/g00/list/rep...Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8=&i10c.ua=1&i10c.dv=13 I could give you thousands more but you get the point.
Right after he and Melania got married. That was still the honeymoon phase. And Barron is 11... So he was doing hookers at the same time he was getting his new bride pregnant. No wonder the evangelicals love him!
Oh yes, according to Stormy's polygraph exam from 2011, she had unprotected sex with trump while he was getting his new bride pregnant.
Mr , Cohen, are you telling me that your skank won't have time to appear before this inquiry because he's too tied up in court?
normally it would be his own business but it verified he lied, and therefore likely lied about all the other women he claimed he never sexually assaulted...
See, it is comments like this: Mr , Cohen, are you telling me that your skank won't have time to appear before this inquiry because he's too tied up in court?
