Which by trolling, you are not doing. You don't have any input, nor debate, just the same drivel posted over and over again. Time to grow up and actually figure out what it is you are trying to push. But if this is the best you can do, I truly feel sorry for you.
Was that post filled with intelligent debate? LOL Bring some ALONG WITH EVIDENCE and i will meet you there. LOL
Love the 308 round. A very useful round. All of my rifles are in 7.62x39 ,7.62x54r or 308 outside of our 22lr rifles. When spam cans of 7.62x54r and 7.62x39 from the Soviet era hit our shores I bought them up before I even had a rifle in those calibers. $60.00 for 440 round spam can was to good to pass up and quantity was for the taking. Did the same for the Mosin carbine model 91/59 and the M38 to include the SKS's from the soviet bloc and China. Less tha $100.00 for each pristine factory refurbished rifle. Sure they are heavy, simple, rough and over built but I love those carbine's. Long live the Mosin Nagant, SKS and the AK. Having made my living in the Army, the 5.56 is under powered when power is needed.
Evidence is not needed when someone has posted well known facts based on experience, which you are too lazy to understand. But than again that is another one of you dumb stock answers.
Thank you for your opinion. If you have evidence then post it. Otherwise I am free to dismiss your claim
Sone peoples definition of “ facts’ is anything a person and friends come up with and repeat ad nauseam. Really, facts are based upon observations and agreed upon evidence supported by institutional consensus. Bottom line.....you need a reference. “ Joe Blow” is not a good reference while “ Johns Hopkins “ is.
By "Johns Hopkins", are you referring to the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, funded by Michael Bloomberg who also funds Everytown for Gun Safety, Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America and Mayors Against Illegal Guns?
Or he could mean John Hopkins Hospital The Johns Hopkins Hospital was ranked as the top overall hospital in the United States for 21 consecutive years by U.S. News & World Report until 2012, when it moved to 2nd place behind the rise of the Massachusetts General Hospital. In 2013, it was reinstated as the top hospital in the United States.[30] In the 2016-2017 Best Hospitals edition, Johns Hopkins ranks 3rd nationally.[31 Sounds like a real dump. LOL
Thanks for the recap. I was in the Navy at the time and spent several months away at sea, so I didn't get all of details of who, when, when, why and how, but do recall the excitement. Yes, the LW anti-gunners were fear-mongering their asses off over the idea....something they still do. Obviously none of it came to pass and, as history has shown, the murder and violent crime rate has steadily gone down.
This is a rediculous statement. Sounds like yours. “Evidence is not needed when someone has posted well known facts based on experience, which you are too lazy to understand.”
Those many folks are the idiots. Its not our (gun owners) fault that schools today churn out morons and imbeciles. When I was a kid every kid I knew had a gun and there were no school shootings. Now that Liberals have turned kids into minds-full-of-mush all sorts of insane stuff happens. I am entertained, though, and your stupid implication that somehow just having a gun makes someone an idiot. LOL. What a moron.
If you truly want to reduce deaths, end dying for one thing. But work on the top 10 causes of deaths. The top 10 leading causes of death in the United States Heart disease. Cancer. Chronic lower respiratory disease. Accidents. Alzheimer's disease. Diabetes. Influenza and pneumonia. Kidney disease. More items... The top 10 leading causes of death in the United States https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/282929.php
Well, there is one fact we can assume is true without evidence. Taking away all guns from an environment, will eliminate gun deaths. That’s why the GOP has meetings in gun free zones, pretty opposite to what they preach.
Sorry, in a debate if you disagree with a statement someone makes it is incumbent upon you to prove them incorrect, the person is not required to back their statement with anything. If you cannot do that, are too lazy to do so, then you lose the debate. That's the way debating works.
