Heat waves in Europe and also in the US ...

Generalization fallacy .. and moronic nonsense .. You keep claiming that "Total annual Oxygen Consumption" is given in some link .. but can't manage to post that number - that you claim everyone can find (except you apparently)

Not up to others to support your claims mate. Either post the number or stop following me around like a small dog nipping at ankles.

 

You claimed without ANY evidence if oceans quit producing oxygen we are ****d. I posted 3 links showing the existing atmospheric oxygen in existence today would last 2000-5000 years. One link contains ALL the data used to come to it’s conclusion. It has been posted to you multiple times.

YOU claimed the idea existing oxygen would last 2000 years was preposterous but you have not supported your opinion with any data or links to data. NONE. You say my information is wrong but you can not provide better data.

Now you want me to supply information I’ve already supplied. I provided evidence for my claims. You have provided no evidence for ANY of your claims and NO evidence my sources are incorrect.

Every argument you have made is fallacious. Your continued inability to support your claims or invalidate mine only weaken your original argument about ocean sourced oxygen that you still haven’t supported with evidence.

I appreciate your continued use of fallacies and your continued inability to substantiate any of your claims. One of my main objectives in debates like this is to point out most people who claim the mantle of science as you have know nothing about science. All they can do is post fallacy and tell others they are wrong. They can’t post links to data or studies. They can’t provide statistics to support their arguments

On the other hand, I have supplied three sources that support my claim. You supplied none. Nor can you correct the errors you claim (without evidence) exist in my sources. If you believe they are wrong it is your responsibility to show how they are and why. If you dispute provided data you MUST provide better data. Period.

When I make claims I provide data to back it up. You do not. Nor can you refute my sources. Asking me repeatedly for information supplied to you multiple times is not a valid argument.

Please stop invoking the term science if you are not going to use evidence to support your claims.

 

"Proven by measurements" ... we only have about 40 years of direct global observation via satelites, everything before that is best guess from proxies and statistical reconstructions. We only had a handful of southern hemisphere observations before global satelite measurements since the southern hemisphere is mostly ocean.

So if you want to argue that we are warmer now than 40 years ago? Sure... but everything you think that means depends on reliable hindcast global climate which doesn't actually exist.

Hell, we STILL have no dependable way of modeling cloud cover, and that is by far the largest contributor to global climate variability. All CO2 "forcing" is is a statistical dumping ground of all climate uncertainty, tainted with bad statistical practices and a truck load of bias.