“Black People Unite!” After Proposal by Black Racist – South Africa Votes to Confiscate Land from Wh

~ land ownership ~

Africans have long measured one's wealthy by land and cattle ownership going back thousands of years


~Gateway Pundit & 9/11 ~

google for more data

 

Thelma, in the 1600's there was NO controlling authority in what is now called South Africa. In fact it was largely empty. It was not like the conquering of the Americas, there was no sweep across the land. Dutch farming settlers went and occupied empty places to set up their homesteads. Blacks were encouraged to help and work the land, for compensation, not as slaves. It was not until gold and diamonds were found that the international bankers got interested in the place. This brought in the corporate interests, and led up to the Boer war with Britain.

 

Laughing off a GENOCIDE - some sense of humour
This Case is then Closed - is it NOT ?

 

Do you believe this story about small pox in blankets and that it was deliberate?

 

http://www.historynet.com/smallpox-in-the-blankets.htm

 

Yes I do.......
and our Christian ancestors quoted Exodus to justify doing this......
but my point is that we should not allow our own guilt over the genocide on the First Nations peoples of America, South America and Canada .... and our ancestors enslavement of millions of Africans.......... to convince us to allow the Blacks of South Africa to do a genocide on the whites of South Afrida!

 

No matter the case, whether it's the ANC or tribes, when the Afrikaner's are all killed, the blacks will be killing each other too. The black on black murders in Africa make Chicago look tame. Just imagine Rhodesia, and South Africa were technically advanced countries in Africa until the turn over in the 1990's. In less than 20 years Rhodesia now Zimbabwe has become a third world country and so has South Africa. "In 2016 the top five challenges to doing business in the country were inefficient government bureaucracy, restrictive labour regulations, a shortage of educated workers, political instability, and corruption, whilst the country's strong banking sector was rated as a strongly positive feature of the economy.[16][17] The nation is amongst the G-20, and is the only African member of the group".

The Economic Decline in Africa - National Bureau of Economic ...
http://www.nber.org/digest/jan04/w9865.html
The Economic Decline in Africa ... Over the past 40 years the investment rate in Africa has fallen. Since ... One of the key consequences of Africa's economic ...As a consequence, hundreds of millions of African citizens have become poor: one half of the African continent lives below the poverty line. In sub-Saharan Africa, per capita GDP is now less than it was in 1974, having declined over 11 percent. In 1970, one in ten poor citizens in the world lived in Africa; by 2000, the number was closer to one in two. That trend translates into 360 million poor Africans in 2000, compared to 140 million in 1975.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
20 Years After Apartheid, South Africa Asks, 'How Are We ...
https://www.npr.org/sections/parall...-apartheid-south-africa-asks-how-are-we-doing
May 05, 2014 · 20 Years After Apartheid, South Africa ... South Africa's favorite debate, waged nonstop since the ... country's leaders have fallen far short of ...But political analysts say the aura of Mandela and the loyalty of older voters won't last forever. For the first time, black South Africans born just after the end of apartheid — known as "born frees" — are eligible to vote and will be passing their own judgment on how the country is doing.

 

But haven't you got the memo, statistics are racist...

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~
"It's A Declaration Of War": South Africa's President Calls ...
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017...ricas-president-calls-confiscation-white-land
South Africa President Jacob Zuma has called on ... to allow the expropriation of white owned land ... Calls For Confiscation Of White Land.
President Zuma’s aggressive move toward redistribution comes as his African National Congress party prepares to elect a new leader to succeed him in December and as he finds himself under growing pressure over corruption allegations. It is disturbing that in order to deflect from his own failings as president, Zuma is willing to risk an economic fate reminiscent that of its neighbor to the north, Zimbabwe, where shortly after a similar confiscation of what land, the economy disintegrated into a hyperinflationary supernova.

~~~~~~~~~~~~​

Jacob Zuma calls for confiscation of white land without ...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...confiscation-white-land-without-compensation/
President Jacob Zuma has called on parliament to change South Africa’s constitution to allow the expropriation of white owned land ... calls for confiscation of ... Mr Zuma first mentioned the expropriation of land in his opening of Parliament speech last month, but Friday was the first time he called for a change in the law. In his February speech, he controversially called in the military to maintain “law and order” on the streets of Cape Town ahead of expected protests calling for him to step down.
It was the first time in South Africa’s history, including the heavily militarised apartheid era, that the president has ordered the military to provide security at parliament.

 

~~~~
Obama tried that with his Pigford Scandal:

Pigford: The Unexamined Obama Administration Scandal
https://www.americanthinker.com/art..._unexamined_obama_administration_scandal.html
The Obama administration has again been protected from a troubling scandal by the mainstream media (MSM) using the tactic of omission to simply ignore the scandal
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Obama reparations scheme | Left Coast Ledger
https://leftcoastledger.wordpress.com/tag/obama-reparations-scheme/
The Obama Administration’s reparations Ponzi scheme, the multi-billion-dollar Pigford II settlement, has left legitimate black farmers out in the cold while paying off virtually anyone who grew a potato plant on their windowsill....
“There’s proof that Pigford is being sold as reparations behind closed doors while the defenders of the current settlement call critics racist for questioning Pigford.”

Obama’s Pigford vote-buying scheme has cost American taxpayers literally hundreds of millions in fraudulent payouts to Southern African Americans who have never farmed a strip of ground, and left legitimate claims to go to seed. It could cost billions if it is not stopped.

 

Still waiting for that link. Or are you going to discredit yourself again?

 

There you go ThelmaMay, you telln 'em, you don't need any stinking proof. The Progressive Marxist Democrats tell you that it's European Imperialism, just as the populating of the America's and Australia was Imperialism. Eh? However, since you are one of those that has benefited by this "Imperialism" what makes it so bad for the South Africans Black or White who were born there and are now part of Africa. Why should Black tribalism destroy the White people who have become part of Africa, like Americans or Australians that have become part of their countries and have tried to improve and raise the economies and education of their respective countries?

 

Its the raw rabid hatred of whitey that clouds their beliefs

 

Its very disgusting that forum members make excuses for this terrible form of racism against whitey. The left wingers here feed us false history, that whitey stole the land to begin with (utterly false BS), and use that false fake as$ history to justify the current expropriation of land. But just as bad is conservatives justifying the exact same thing which has been perpetrated against the Palestineans for decades. It just goes to show the power of propaganda. I would hope my fellow conservatives would educate themselves on this issue, but they are mired too deep in Jewish Supremacist propaganda.

 

There is no evidence whatsoever that settlers deliberately transmitted smallpox to native Americans. It is a myth. These people for the most part would have no idea how to transport the smallpox virus and, as far as we know, chose to avoid it whenever possible. Would it really make any sense to risk the lives of their families, friends, and neighbors by carrying a deadly virus around with them? You'll need more evidence than just a belief that this is so, as well as proof of your claim that smallpox is even mentioned in the Bible.

Our guilt? You can speak for yourself here. The Spanish certainly abused the aboriginal people of South and Central America, along with each other, but the British influenced cultures did a lot better.

The brutal fact is that aboriginals everywhere, though some more than others, have trouble adapting to the European cultures and the Native Americans are among them. Fortunately that is changing, though a lot slower than many would like.

 

And more than a little jealousy.

 

Except for the fact that Jews never left the Palestinian area even after the uprising in 70 AD. Jews still remained there. There were jews in the Middile East throughout the centuries especially what was called Trans-Jordan that included Palestine after WWI and WWII. The creation of Israel was the results of the Balfour Declarations and the UN solution of the Displaced Persons of Europe after WWII. After WWII Russian dominated areas began pogroms against the surviving Displaced Jews of the Holocaust.

POSTWAR REFUGEE CRISIS AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL
https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005459
During World War II, the Nazis deported between seven and nine million Europeans, mostly to Germany. Within months of Germany's surrender in May 1945, the Allies repatriated to their home countries more than six million displaced persons (DPs; wartime refugees). Between 1.5 million and two million DPs refused repatriation.
The Jewish Brigade Group, formed as a unit within the British army in late 1944, worked with former partisans to help organize the Brihah (literally "escape"), the "Exodus" of 250,000 Jewish refugees across closed borders from inside Europe to the coast in an attempt to sail for Palestine.

 

Expropriation of Privately owned lands is just that. Theft. Doesn't matter if Jews were there are not, to this day their land is being expropriated by the Israeli Government and the Settlers. Theft is Theft, I don't care how it's sliced or what is used to justify it.

 

Again, the rightwing argument is that two wrongs make a right. Since 'they' did it, it's okay for 'me' to do it. The land did not belong to the Europeans. They took over the land and subjugated the black population. If you don't think they did, you are wrong. The Dutch treated the blacks even worse than the British did. The blacks are still the majority there, and if they want their land back and have the power to do it, then I say they have a right to it. Has nothing to do with liberalism and definitely nothing to do with 'Marxism. You don't agree so you make an ad hominem attack. Tsk tsk...shame on you.

 

Please enlighten yourself...with all due respect.

http://mondoweiss.net/2017/02/legalizing-palestinian-israeli/

 

Horespucky, you can't even provide a link to show this. It's been explained in great detail to you that the land was settled, not stolen.

 

~~~~
I didn't make an ad hominem attack. I plainly stated that you have not supplied any fact historical or otherwise information that supports your statements. However, in the case of South Africa the African National Congress (ANC) a completely Marxist entity heavily involved in fraud and corruption in two of South Africa’s biggest monopolies has failed and continues in genocide of the White Africans that were born and contribute to Africa's society.
In this case you're correct two wrongs do not make a right. Blacks were given their right to vote it did not give them the right to genocide. Then again in the Marxist view genocide is their way of redistribution as proven time and again by Russian and Chinese tyrants. Why should Black ANC Marxism be any different eh?

 

'Settled' is a very convenient term. Stolen is the truth. It was not their land to 'settle.'

 

It's called "adverse possession".

 

Of course it's easy enough to make this a Black versus White issue but in fact it's always a 'war' issue, or 'conflict' issue, in which the stronger takes over the weaker.

Tribes in Africa were also fighting each other in a constant state of warfare but you would never think of that as a Black versus Black issue. It's tribal. Tribes from Europe arrived and eventually defeated the local tribes. That they were "White", or having a Mediterranean appearance, mattered little. It is all about Darwin's theory.