Circular logic, I say Santa is real, if you don't believe it YOU have the burden of proof. I never said anything about planted, pay attention. Non sequitur. I don't have a "story", the US government does, they claim it was AA77. No proof exists that it was AA77 to my knowledge, the burden of proof lies with the US government. No eyewitnesses have proved or can prove it was AA77 that crashed into the Pentagon. None of them have the capacity to do so, none are trained in forensic airline crash investigations. No parts were ever identified as parts from AA77. Yet another non sequitur, this is strictly about proving it was AA77. Still more nonsense and non sequiturs, the burden of proof ALWAYS lies with the claimant. My ONLY point is that the US government has never forensically identified any of the parts as belonging to any of the 4 alleged planes. If you know of any legitimate document that matched the alleged parts found via their serial numbers to the exact claimed flights and was verified, please provide it and I'll be satisfied I don't need to do any such thing. You have no clue how this works. Try that in a court of law and the judge will silence you in 2 seconds and tell you to go back to law school. Same repetitive nonsense.