A little perspective on the chance that you will be a victim

Discussion in 'Gun Control' started by OrlandoChuck, Dec 29, 2017.

  1. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It wasn’t true, lol
     
  2. AlphaOmega

    AlphaOmega Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    28,747
    Likes Received:
    4,821
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ive posted the stats here numerous times complete with the actual calculation. Its never been disproven. You are factually more likely to be killed by second hand smoke...not first hand...I said second hand smoke... than by a gun in the U.S. You slightly more likely to be killed by a gun than being hit by lightning. but thats using suicide and gang banger stats. If not lightning is more likely to kill you. Getting mail at your mailbox near the street is definitely more dangerous.
     
  3. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Pray tell how was it determined that such was indeed known?
     
  4. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The fact that you know and I know it isn’t true.
     
  5. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What methodology was utilized to determine what matters are and are not known to be factually correct on the part of myself?
     
  6. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Truth vs lie
     
  7. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Such does not answer the question that was presented for consideration. What was the methodology that was utilized, in making the determination that a statement presented on the part of myself was knowingly based on false information?
     
  8. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course it does. You just don’t like the answer. Which is your problem, not mine.
     
  9. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If something is factually incorrect, such as quite literally everything that has been presented by yourself in recent history, there is no reason to "like" it.
     
    6Gunner and DoctorWho like this.
  10. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Except you know perfectly well that nothing I said is incorrect.
     
  11. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Quite literally everything that has been said by yourself in recent time, ranging from auto-sears, to rate of fire, to the general welfare clause, and to the above, is all factually incorrect.
     
    6Gunner, An Taibhse and DoctorWho like this.
  12. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Which of course you know is a lie.
     
  13. DoctorWho

    DoctorWho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    15,501
    Likes Received:
    3,740
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Very true, as everyone here will agree.
     
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2018
    6Gunner and An Taibhse like this.
  14. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The statement on the part of yourself, that is the exercise in intellectual dishonesty in this discussion. The observation on the part of myself, however, is based on indisputable, undeniable facts established by the posting history of yourself.
     
    6Gunner and An Taibhse like this.
  15. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You know this is a lie as well
     
  16. DoctorWho

    DoctorWho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    15,501
    Likes Received:
    3,740
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, you told many lies,
    I am glad we agree.
    Please stop lying.
     
    6Gunner likes this.
  17. 6Gunner

    6Gunner Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,631
    Likes Received:
    4,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I find it fascinating at how thoroughly you've demonstrated the dishonesty of the other, yet they continue to mindlessly shriek, "Lies!"

    It's kind of sad, really....
     
    DoctorWho likes this.
  18. DoctorWho

    DoctorWho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    15,501
    Likes Received:
    3,740
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So true, so young, so wrong, sigh,
    So said the undertaker as he viewed the sad folorn remains of the unknown dead young victim before him, one of many sad unclaimed victims of crime, it did not ever become any easier for him.

    Still, he shut off emotion and set out on the long hard cold meticulous task before him, to restore whatever cold violence had claimed, a pretty 9 year old youth, a flower soon lost and withered......

    Excerpt from, "A lost youth"
    Author Me......
     
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2018
    6Gunner likes this.

Share This Page