a plea — diversity not a good thing!

Bull flops. He is just shrieking that he does not want to have to live around "mud people," so he has a right to say that I should not be allowed to marry a black woman if I so choose and to buy any house, anywhere, that is for sale within my price range. That is stupid. Nothing gives him or you such a right.

 

Please post a pic of your black lady; may shed some light on your lefty positions here.

 

Actually, I wound up married to a Korean, but that was just a matter of timing and location.

I was a soldier, and moved around a lot. The few times a good relationship seemed about to jell, we both wound up elsewhere, until I met my wife, the first week I was in country.

But that is irrelevant. There are scum bags out there who object even to my marrying a Korean, and they should all eat fugu livers and improve the gene pool.

 

You've taken my comment out of context. I was not replying to Anders - I was replying to you. The full comment is this:

http://www.politicalforum.com/race-...versity-not-good-thing-12.html#post1061340880

Why are you misrepresenting what I said?

 

Yeah like Hitler won world war 2.

 

There is absolutely no hypocrisy in the position I have made - and you have as yet to identify any. What's more its a libertarian position.

 

I have absolutely no problem with interracial relationships in themselves. What I do object to is government pushed immigration and integration, against the will of the majority of people. Of course some people will want to marry out, and that's fine. Huge numbers of outsiders coming in is disturbing and unnatural, and motivated by the will of hostile special interest groups, not the interests and desire of the people.

 

Its entirely natural, in no way disturbing and in the interests and desires of the people:

NYT Poll:

"Which comes closest to your view about illegal immigrants who are currently working in the U.S.?"

They should be allowed to stay in their jobs and to eventually apply for U.S. citizenship. (43% favour)
OR, They should be allowed to stay in their jobs only as temporary guest workers, but not to apply for U.S. citizenship. (21% favour)
OR, They should be required to leave their jobs and leave the U.S. (32% favour)
Unsure (4%)
http://www.pollingreport.com/immigration.htm

 

So according to the NYT (which is likely influenced by special interest groups and untrustworthy) a majority of people want them to not be granted citizenship. You are asserting that black is white here, what gives?

Here's a good book on perhaps the main influence on immigration policy:
http://www.velesova-sloboda.org/arc...t-in-intellectual-and-political-movements.pdf

 

Another conspiracy theory, great.

They clearly dont mind people coming to the US, contrary to your statement.

I think we're done here.

 

Oh please, enough with your conspiracy theories. No one on this forum has ever said anything like this.
"mud people"? hahahaha
Do a google search. You are the only member using that term on this forum:

But the question is at what point?

Yes there is. Mice share 97.5 percent of their DNA with humans, while chimpanzees share 98.8 percent. An African shares around 99 percent of the same DNA with a European member of the homosapien species. So at what point are they all the same?
Surely an adult chimpanzee has more conciousness than a human baby that has just been born?

I find it rather ironic that liberals are the ones complaining about "right wing gun crazies".
What position exactly am I advocating that you think people would rise up with their guns?
I am strongly in favor of guns. Other races can decide for themselves whether they want to allow their own members to own guns. Liberals are the ones that want to take guns away from everyone.

Liberals have already created "rights" preventing employers from deciding who they do, and do not, want to hire, and how much they pay their employees. The right to live in a racially segregated community is not any different.

Progressives have blatent double standards. They have already dictated who I have to rent or sell my private land to. And who banks are obligated to lend money to, even when it means that certain group of people have a higher chance of never paying the money back. If race-mixing progressives have the right to impose laws like the "Fair Housing Act" (Title VIII in the Civil Rights Act of 1968) on my private property, then racial separatists have the right to policies that promote racial segregation also. As liberals have already dictated what people had to do with their private land to mix together the different races, liberals cannot really complain if racial separatists impose reverse policies to re-separate the different races agains.

Race mixing/integration does cause environmental harm. It creates an unsafe environment in our communities, and a bad educational environment for our children in tax-payer funded schools.

Liberals have no problem discriminating against income level. I guess it is really not surprising they want to pick and choose who the government should discriminate against. Understand, we have to discriminate. If we did not discriminate between citizens and non-citizens, just imagine what would happen! I guess it's not really surprising that progressives just do not get this. There is going to be out of control crime, violence against women, high unemployment, hoards of poverty, low wages, environmental destruction, and progressives will still be asking themselves why, because they refuse to see that they are the ones that caused it all.

My fantasy world? It has been the race mixing progressives who are the ones building their "fantasy world". At some level, I think, the progressive leaders actually know that racial biological differences exist, and so these differences have to be DESTROYED, through racial mixing. And they know that there can never be "global equality" without racial mixing.

Progressives are the truely "racist" ones.

Liberals have been doing it on welfare mothers for YEARS!

If a regulation is reasonable to prevent racial mixing, in a deranged ideological group's pursuit of "equality", TOO FREAKING BAD.
The world does not revolve around progressives.

You are aware that many, perhaps most liberals want to ban guns, even if not all of them admit it. If the UN had its way, guns would already be banned. I am all in favor of ending poverty, and creating good standards of living for everyone. But the last thing I want is for all the different ethnicities to be mixed together. I thought liberals were trying to "promote diversity", why are they destroying it?

Liberals want to take impose regulations on everyone to create their own ideal world.
Racial separatism is really not very different.

 

Conspiracy? It's no coincidence that the NYT is a privately owned, non peer reviewed source. It has about as much credibility as a piece of ass paper scrawled in crayon. Try to come up with a credible source. And even your own source shows a majority of Americans do not support citizenship. The fact a majority voted for 0bama is more to do with media coverage and because he's black than their opinions on individual issues. A Swiss model involving a referendum on issues would halt immigration. The system in the US is screwed, a media fueled personality contest, and then when it comes time for these dancing puppets to make important decisions they screw the American people at the order of their handlers time and time again. But hey, 0bama's black and he has a nice smile right?

 

Not much less credibility than the propaganda being churned out by university studies in today's world. One university actually directed over a million dollars to fund a study trying to support the idea that humans are less genetically related to chimpanzees than previously thought, in an attempt to take credibility away from those who say that racial differences are not so unlike the difference between humans and chimpanzees. So although the two actually share 98.5 of the same DNA, this study was used to loudly proclaim to the public that it was actually only "93.5", claiming most of the similarities were in non-functional "junk" DNA.
I doubt they will ever fund such a study examining these "junk DNA" differences in different populations of humans.

 

There are studies. "The Role of Geography in Human Adaptation" found most of the differences were in functional and highly selected DNA. They also found these selected alleles spread within regions West Eurasia, East Asia and SS Africa, AKA races.

 

There is an article in an open-access jopurnal "proving" that there was super-thermite in the dust of the WTC. Got some reliable source for your BS?

 

I put the word in quotes because that is what the idiots call them.

About 6 months.

[

When the idiots convince enough other people that black people are going to take over the country. Some of them have the shrieking monkey racists almost stirred up to that point now.

Actually it was right-wiong cops who wanted to disarm the Black Panthers who started the draconian gun laws in California.

Bull feathers. A working man has a right to a decent day's provisions for a decent day's work, and those who control the ecconomy of an area cannot be allowed to create a sub-class of people by excluding them from the ecconomic mainstream.

No, because that limits my rights as a rational human being.

I am going to have to make a couple posts to break this wall of compost into comprehensible bits.

 

PLOS Genetics and an article co-authored by Sforza? It's a top rank peer reviewed journal, they sometimes make articles open access. There is no better source. I am literally sitting here laughing that you would call these undisputed facts BS. Typical leftist. You forgot to call me "ignrant". LMAO.

 

Never heard of it.

 

It doesn't surprise me. Leftists know it all. They know that "everybody is the same" and everybody that doesn't know that is "ignrant".

No need to actually read the sources I provide before denouncing their credibility because, well, you know it all.

Just denounce these guys as "BS", it's easier than understanding genetics and reading the paper and discussing. Why use knowledge and facts when you can just call people "racist" and win the debate?