How the woman got pregnant is completely irrelevant since it does not change anything - The standard of value is still the woman's life. She is protected by her rights and who she sleeps with or how is none of your business. Aren't you Conservatives supposed to be defenders of Individual Rights and small government? By what twisted logic does Individual Rights stop in her womb and why do you want to invite the government into her bedroom? Leave her alone, you creep.
I think you are being far too generous. People devoted to religion, whether male or female, are always prepared to sacrifice their own lives for "God's plan". I mean, some of them even reject cancer treatments.
LOL! I am not talking about "my schedule" I am talking about choices. Keeping it in their pants is an option. Please save that petty nonsense for those who fall for it.
How the woman got pregnant is completely relevant. If a woman isn't responsible enough then killing is not the answer.
I know this might be a tough question for you to answer, but I'll give you one more chance. What happens in the event a woman becomes pregnant even though she took birth control and assuming abortion were to become illegal in the US?
Assuming she took birth control? You have to chose the most rare occurrence to base your argument? Sad. Here is a riddle for you: What is the difference between a pregnant woman and a light bulb? Answer: You can unscrew a light bulb.
I'll answer that question. And it's a question that's a bit misleading, because it presumes that popping a birth control pill counts as "birth control". The woman can make her chances as low as she wants. It will never go down to absolutely zero. The Pro-Life position does not believe women are entitled to be able to have sex with absolutely no chance of pregnancy whatsoever. There will always be some small chance of pregnancy with standard vaginal intercourse. But there are numerous things the woman (and her partner) can do to make those chances extremely small. If the woman's going to have lots and lots of sex, hopefully it is a partner with whom it would not be the end of the world for her to have a baby with.
Well they do because a fetus has NO rights....Anti-Choicers want fetuses to have more rights than any BORN person ever had...
And wouldn't that be nice if NO one did "stupid crap" ? Wouldn't that result in a perfect fairy tale Utopia.....and it isn't going to happen...HUMANS, ALL humans, do "stupid crap"....and most is not against the law....and if it's not against the law it shouldn't be punished by law..
ENTITLED to have sex ????? WHAT TF are you talking about??? Control issue much ??? YES.. An aside: Does The Pro-Life position does not believe MEN are entitled to be able to have sex with absolutely no chance of pregnancy whatsoever ?? . Why should she? What YOU recommend is women not having sex at all...!!! But they will...they will have sex when they want with who they want at anytime they want any WAY they want and YOU can't do a thing about it
There is no use trying to reason with someone who.. apparently.. denies a human fetus is, in fact, a human being.. so there Mr. Rational. BTW in my opinion, denying the existence of the Creator, i.e. GOD, is the epitome of irrationality.