Alabama Voters Back To Moore, Nov. 30

That is not due process, is it!

Remember Straus Kahn? Yes/No.

 

Libs happily elected/supported/nominated/enabled rapists, sex assaulters, perverts..... confirmed, not alleged ones.

 

Name ONE Dem child molester ever elected

 

What does DSK have to do with this?

He's not even American

 

Are you serious or playing the fool?
Straus Kahn lost his position and future due to charges that never made it to court.
What part don't you get?
Due process methinks.
Although not American, the "legal process" against him was.
It was in American jurisdiction.


Moi's point is about due process.
Not the choir singing guilty.
Less political liability to be part of that choir and proven wrong,
than to bring up such reservations such as "due process".

 

Dems elected Bill Clinton, kept him in charge of their party for 25 years knowing that he was confirmed rapist and sex offender,
Dems nominated and almost got Hillary Clinton elected knowing she was a known confirmed enabler and "cleaner" of a rapist and sex offender
Dems elected clown, pervert and sex offender Franken
Dems elected their "icon" and sex predator Conyers
Dems accepted millions from known and confirmed pervert, rapist and sex offender Weinstein
.....
The list is endless but I am sure you got the point.

 

So let me understand here. If you think someone probably IS a child molester (and the Alabama Governor does) , you think that this should not influence your vote until that person is convicted?

 

Would it be safe to say that what you don't know is a bottomless pit? What makes you really think you received a proper basic sexual education? But you have no clue as to why Moore did anything. As I said before, don't try and convince me you understand psychology.

Your whole argument is based on false illusions starting with a mental conviction of the intended victim, persecution without prosecution, blame shift to others for not persecuting the victim, and pretending to take a superior position based on these false assumptions.

And to think your knowledge of sex that took all that time from a public high school seems to be a matter of pride. Was this before or during the period where sex education encompasses Sally likes Jane and Peter likes Dick?

But all that still leaves you ill equipped to answer the questions, doesn't it?

 

There have been plenty of people accused of sexual misconduct from BOTH parties (and probably from Kazakhstan as well) but i have YET to see a child molester be elected by Democrats.

 

Your "our perverts and sex criminals are cleaner than yours" defense would be considered beyond pathetic even in Kazakhstan, let alone the civilized world.

Dems are a party of confirmed sex criminals, rapists and perverts and the libs/prog crowd giddily support, elect, defend and enable them in exchange for money and power. No amount of your hair splitting and finger pointing can change these facts.

 

Here we go again with the suppositions. Do you have any proof, and accusations are not proof but what needs to be proved?

 

Here we go again with the suppositions. Do you have any proof, and accusations are not proof but what needs to be proved?

 

Sorry but that's not even close.

Trying to claim that Dems have a lock on political sexual escapades and that Republicans aren't just as bad or worse is just stupid.

However there has never in my lifetime been an accused child molester elected by Democrats. That's an entirely different animal

I'm still curious why someone living in Kazakhstan would be such as vehement Republican supporter.

How is that?

 

I am not claiming anything, besides the fact that libs, progs, dems have been caught with their pants down in bed with a bunch liberal sex assaulters, rapists and perverts and this leftist mob happily and willingly prostitute themselves to their perverted and criminal elite in exchange for power, money and transgender bathrooms.

 

Think, so you don't know but you still want to persecute. And what does the Alabama governor know? The remark she made was extremely prejudice and stupid to begin with. Here you have a Governor of a State trying and convicting another citizen without due process. Typical for a Democratic, oh wait she turned Republican in 2002, politician.

 

I would suggest that you open your eyes, it is hard to see when one drifts through life with the eyes closed. The depth of the depravity of the political entitled crowd has yet to be discovered.

 

My eyes are WIDE open...and what I'm seeing is the GOP about to elect a child molester

 

Like her..I see no reason to disbelieve the woman who was 14 when Moore molested her. Were this a Dem there is no way in hell I would vote for that person

 

Just curious...did you not notice all the Republicans sex offenders we've had exposed?

Also...don't you live in Kazakhstan?

 

Why are you so obsessed with sex criminals. Is it because your lib movement clearly adores them and prostitutes themselves to them for power and money?

 

Isn't the political game so much fun? What's it like when that world of gray becomes the Super HD reality of full color?

Now when this guy wins, should we rejoice or weep? Personally I could care less, he is just another psychopath that believes he is a god and can dictate the lives of others.

Personally, I am still sad that Hitlerly lost. I was so looking forward to this country receiving it's just reward. Had she won this could have been the season of nuclear lights instead of Christmas lights, but that option is not off the table yet, just a smaller party involved.

 

But you would vote for Hitlerly no doubt. My what a strong set of ethics.

 

Aren't you the same one that on another thread said you don't believe there is anything to the Mueller investigation, despite the fact that we have confessions?

I wouldn't expect to convince you of anything even if it hit you on the head. And I'm not even interersted. You live in your own fantasy world and nothing will take you out of it.

 

What are you talking about? I eliminate everything I'm not interested in commenting on. It's common practice so long as the context is not altered. That's how forums work.

Now... You were saying: Judgement about whom (or what)?

If you don't want to answer, I understand. I already know you yourself understand that this guy is a creep and that you are just struggling to find excuses for him.

 

I know it by comparing it to the one you received.... Or, to be more precise, the one that you obviously didn't receive.