American Cancer Society: Breast cancer NOT LINKED to abortion

Please. You are the biased one. You are so deeply entrenched in the abortion dogma you refuse to see the facts right in front of you.

http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/press_releases/110117/index.htm

That proabortionists strive to keep the breast cancer/abortion link hidden is totally immoral. Why would they do this? Because:

And let's not forget how much $$$$ the abortion mills make...death is a big business.

 

The irony....

Physicians for Life, Joel Brind, David Reardon...We don't have to read their articles, we already know what they'll say, just like they know what they'll find before they do the research.

Anyone working in an abortion clinic could be working in a hospital or other facility instead. Doctors and the whole medical profession make a lot more money delivering babies and providing pre-natal care than they do from one-or-two-visit abortions. Then let's not forget the whole baby industry of maternity clothes, baby clothes and furniture, baby food, baby formula, all the paraphernalia that babies require these days. A whole lot of people have financial interests in seeing that MORE babies are born.

 

Here is #7 on your list of 106 "studies":

A Girl Scout survey???

 

No, if you read my links to published scientific studies, you wouldn't spout such nonsense.

http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/abc_summary.htm#Biological Evidence

 

YES - it is a large organization...and can certainly commission a scientific study:

http://www.physiciansforlife.org/content/view/1846/49/

Well - you went cherry picking...how about some of the other 106 studies, like this one:

Women Having Abortions Increase Premature Birth Risk 34% in Subsequent Pregnancies (2011)

AND we know that premature delivery caused by a prior abortion ALSO increases the breast cancer risk...

 

But how does a Girl Scout study that "finds girls are less likely than boys to recommend abortion to their friends" show "the stress of an abortion causes long-term mental, physical, and emotional issue...including breast cancer," as you said it did?

It doesn't. Just admit Physicians for Life were padding their list with a Girl Scout survey as well as flawed and debunked studies.

 

You DO have reading comprehension issues. What I said:

And I can provide numerous studies (106) that show the stress of an abortion causes long-term mental, physical, and emotional issues...including breast cancer.

What was the GS study about? Girls are less likely than boys to recommend abortion to their friends. And, overall, less than 10 percent of young people say they would ever suggest an abortion. It was a legit study showing how abortion is looked upon unfavorably.

I noticed you totally ignored this study:

Women Having Abortions Increase Premature Birth Risk 34% in Subsequent Pregnancies (2011)

Tsk, tsk...think of all the harm women who have abortions are subjected to...good thing 90% of Girl Scouts find abortion objectionable. Seems they are more knowledgable then you.

 

So then, what you are saying is that as far as abortion and cancer are concerned, a woman is d@mned if she does, and d@mned if she doesn't.

In other words, any further discussion of the topic of cancer as it relates to abortion is mooted by the fact that obtaining an abortion may present a cancer risk, and not obtaining an abortion may present a cancer risk.

Now, what is your next line of reasoning for why women should not have an abortion? The "abortion causes cancer" line is officially dead and buried.

 

Duh - where did you get 'and not obtaining an abortion is a cancer risk'? I have NOT said this - and I know of NO studies that came to this conclusion.

You are deluded. My point is that there is are NUMEROUS studies showing the harm abortion causes the women who undergo the procedure, INCLUDING an increased risk of breast cancer.

 

Please, don't tell other people they have reading comprehension problems when you make such mistakes as changing "Girls are less likely than boys to recommend abortion to their friends. And, overall, less than 10 percent of young people say they would ever suggest an abortion" to "90% of Girl Scouts find abortion objectionable". Not wanting to tell your friends what to do does NOT translate into finding something objectionable.

The risk of prematurity following abortion is just as much bunk as all your other wild-eyed ideas, why don't you, just once, check out a reliable source?

http://www.rcog.org.uk/what-we-do/c...uman-fertilisation-and-embryology-bill/brie-4

5. Is termination of pregnancy linked to preterm labour or intrauterine growth restriction?
From the recent studies reviewed no clear relationship between previous induced abortion or miscarriage and occurrence of preterm labour or intrauterine growth restriction was demonstrable.

Seven studies published since 2004 were reviewed. A recent analysis of a population-based database in Finland (Raatikainen et al, 2006) demonstrated no evidence of adverse pregnancy outcome following induced abortion. Similarly, a study in Denmark (Virk et al, 2007) of women who had had an induced abortion between 1999 and 2004 showed no increased risk of subsequent risk of ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, premature delivery or low birth weight with medical termination of pregnancy compared to surgical termination of pregnancy.

 

And there are volumes of studies showing that that high levels of stress can lead to a variety of cancers, and other diseases as well!

How many times are we going to go over this?

STRESS CAN LEAD TO CANCER.

Ergo, getting an abortion may lead to cancer, and not getting an abortion may lead to cancer.

What part of that do you not understand?