Ann Coulter: George Santos Embraces ‘Storytelling’

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/01/26/ann-coulter-george-santos-embraces-storytelling/

Obviously there are two standards of lying or shall we just say, “Well, truth depends on what party you are in!”.
So the Santos guy gets elected, and we find out he is a caricature of none other that Joe “The Fiddling Fibber” Biden. 75th out of 85 in a law school supported by his father (I made the part about his father up, but were are talking Biden, so it’s ok.) Joe is definitely not the sharpest Sharpie in the drawer.
BUT, this Santos guy checks the biggest and most important box of all! He has been photographed as a gay drag performer! You cant make this stuff up! Thankfully, he is like number 438 in the line of succession to emergency Prez… he says.

 

I guess I don't get the hyperventilation from democrats. it isn't like they don't actively still support Liz Pocahantus Warren. That hasn't changed. I mean, she literally used a minority status criminally. But who cares. I think what really drives democrats nuts about Santos isn't that he lied, a lot it seems, but that he isn't toeing the victimization line democrats have asserted we must all follow for gay folk and trannies. And that, the crime of non conformance, is literally the worst of all for them. My comment is that if the nice folks in NY want to remove mr Santos, they can. If not, like the psychotic woman from Watts, he will be there a minute....

Biden literally lies, all day, every day, I doubt he even recognizes the truth any more. So, democrats seem not to care at all about those lies.

 

Rudy Giuliani was also "photographed as a gay drag performer."

https://www.google.com/search?q=rud...-samsung-rvo1&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

So what?

Santos is living proof that the GOP puts party before country. He may not be "in line for the presidency," but each and every member of the House can make or contribute to decisions that affect our lives. Personally, I prefer those who can actually keep track of their lies. George can't even do that much. He needs to be removed.

 

Nonsense. Biden is like many politicians who can get an occasional fact wrong. sure, he committed a plagiarism transgression in his much younger days, but the operative phrase is 'much younger days', and he has since apologized. But the right hasn't complained about Melania's blatant plagiarizing of Michelle Obama, But, Biden is no Santos. If you believe that, you are engaging in hype partisanship.

Santos lies include, but not limited to, that......
That he’s the biracial descendent of Ukrainian Jews
That he attended elite private school Horace Mann and Baruch College
That his mother died due to 9/11
That his grandparents survived the holocaust
That he ran a charity that saved thousands of dogs
That four of his employees died in the Pulse nightclub shooting
That he ran a family firm worth millions
That he managed a real estate empire

If one scrutinizes Santos's lies, as Bill Maher pointed out, the sob story victimhood and compassion lies are designed to appeal to democrats, and the super achiever lies are designed to appeal to republicans, so a lie for everyone!

Sorry, Biden doesn't tell lies anywhere near in the volume and astonishment and sheer cunning calculation of Santos, who lies about EVERYTHING.

But, it's funny how you are harp on lies and you failed to mention the popularity of Herschel Walker, a magnanimous liar who thankfully got beat for his bid to the Senate,, but wait, then there's the biggest liar of all time, Donald Trump, who has chalked up over 30,000 lies to date, who exclaimed at every rally, over and over and over again, that 'Democrats rigged the election' a gargantuan lie for which he has yet to provide any evidence, and said it long before the first ballot was ever cast, shaking the confidence in American democracy to some 65 million people, a level of damage to America far worse than any politician in history, and the right just shrugs its shoulders.

 

Clearly he studied under her.

 

We as conservative type republicans must realize that dems don't care, for example, that Santos used to dress in drag. What dems to care about and wish to do is raise the ire of neocons like Ann Coulter, er, neocons which are less than 10 percent of the voters in the GOP (not in congress), who do care whether Santos used to dress in drag or who do care about destroying Putin or who don't want free speech, for example.

BTW, what a conservative type republican does do is allow the neocon to be against Putin, Santos or free speech, for examples, while we conservative type republicans ridicule neocons...Neocons and other authoritarians make laws to prevent speech and thought which is contrary to the thoughts and speech of the authoritarian, er, neocons and other authoritarians are against free speech, for example.

 

How come no people on the Right remember former President Trump when they are concerned about "Biden's lies"?

 

Because they didn't care about Trump's lies. They did somersaults trying to show that he wasn't lying.

 

It’s called partisanitis

 

Ok, I'll give this a second whirl...

The evidence is actually clear here. There are non repudiable emails, publicly available. The emails document that Hunter inc is being led by his father, his uncle et al. And in the course of those dealings, both sensitive and classified information was being transacted.

I would point out that my comments simply reflect the content, contextually, available. Ignore it if you will. No one will expect you to do anything else. But it still is an observable behavior. It can be commented on in a civil way, as has been done, to date.

 

So far, I"ve only seen you on the right talk about this 'evidence', but you never produce it. Why? Simple, I sure as hell am not going to take your word for it. PUOSU.

Produce it, I'm not here to do your work for you.

That which I"ve seen thus far is not evidence and if you produce it, and I make that conclusion, I will detail why it isn't evidence. I'm coming to the conclusion that many on the right do not have a clue as to what constitutes 'proof' and what does not. There is evidence, and there is evidence, the question is, will it withstand cross examination in a court of law? Though I'm no lawyer, I can provide a reasonably good amateur's cross here on this forum, in my not-so-humble opinion (I always invite real lawyers to chime in, and I know of at least one is a member of this forum).

However, you have this glaring fact which quells your claim.

Note that US Attorney David Weiss, Delaware, who as assigned to investigate Hunter Biden by Bill Barr, who was left in place to finish the task by Joe Biden, (and he didn't have to, as it is routine for a new administration to replace all the US attorneys) one can hardly accuse Biden of corruption, but the point is, the FBI and all relevant investigative bodies have an ISO copy of the laptop, and to date, Weiss, nor anyone in the FBI, after over 3 years of investigating Hunter, has not spoken a word about Joe Biden, or anything illegal or untoward about Joe Biden, and one would imagine, that a Trump appointed US Attorney appointed by Trumps AG would do just that. Nor have any whistleblowers in the FBI come forward (probably because there is nothing to blow the whistle on). And, since we have, as a matter of public record, Garland doing things that were in Trump's favor, Republicans favor, any allegation that he is acquiescing to the demands of any political party or President, allegations that he is not acting without 'fear or favor' (as he often exclaims) are without foundation, the evidence being to the contrary.

 

LIES for me but not for thee. This is the constitution of the democrats

 

ROFLMAO!

Why should they? Drag isn't a dangerous thing. However, since you clearly think that dressing in drag is an evil, why doesn't the right every vilify Rudy for doing them same?

https://www.google.com/search?q=rud...-samsung-rvo1&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

Doesn't that seem just a tad hypocritical?

 

Dude, I don't think it's harmful that Santos dressed in drag. Neocons, er, less than 10% of GOP voters not in congress care that Santos dressed in drag.

 

Then why bring it up? Slow news day?

 

GAME RESPECTS GAME: George Santos Calls Out ‘Career Pathological Liar’ Biden In Apology, Despite His Own Career of Lying.



'Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) is calling out those who have criticized his "exaggerating," comparing it to President Joe Biden's 40-year career as a pathological liar. '

Unlike Biden, Santos admits and owns his lies.

'Santos said that he learned his lesson and that even though the president of the United States has gone through his career as a liar, it does not make it okay.'



Santos Commits to Improvement:

"And I've learned my lesson. And I can guarantee you that from now on, anything and everything is always going to be above board. It's largely already been above board. I'm just going to go the extra step to double-check, cross-reference everything."

Americans are gracious, looking for progress not perfection.

 

Dems bring up Santos because they think it hurts the GOP...Period. Dems don't care about people who dress in drag, for example...Neocons, the squeaky wheel 9% of the GOP, do care about people who dress in drag, for example...Figure it out, just once.

 

No, liberals bring up Santos (not just democrats) because he epitomizes how stupid a political party has gotten. He truly is the poster child for politicians using fake agendas. I can remember the days when a comedian turned Senator had to resign for a photo of him pretending to cop a feel on a sleeping actress while on a NSO mission and a president resigning for covering up the illegal activities of underlings not at his request
.

 

You agree with me. Dems don't care about Santos. Dems are hopeful that Santos may hurt the GOP.

 

Hopeful is not the word. Try expectant. What we hope is that they learn from this. Of that, sadley , we are not expectant.

 

I think you're wrong about why the Democrats keep bringing up the fact that George Santos, if that's even his name, is an habitual teller of tales is to illustrate the blatant hypocrisy of the right. They scream for immediate removal if an elected Democrat so much as leers at someone inappropriately, but if one of their own is a Santos type, completely inexcusable and irredeemable on all accounts, unable to keep track of his own bullshit, no problem ... they want his vote and they're fighting to keep him. Party before country.

"Figure it out, just once" We discussed your snarkiness towards me on several previous occasions. That was insulting and uncalled for. If you can't be civil, don't reply to my posts.

 

The hypocrisy of the right is the habitual telling of tales?? You know, people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Now you're impersonating a mod on DP?

 

Doesn't make it any less true.

 

The right no longer has an ideology of it's own. It now only reacts to what people trying to move forward do.
What new plans has this congress put forward? None that I've noticed, just attempts to remove/stop existing plans and laws.
Can you just imagine what Lincoln would have said and done about protesters entering Congress with Confederate flags. They would.not have gone to trial.

 

I think I would include in your list the carrying the Confederate or Nazi flags by people claiming to be fighting for America.