Another left wing claim against Ivermectin bites the dust.

No, they issued an "update", lol. Short of a retraction.

 

The giant push for vaccines and virtual ignoring of therapeutics by the government and Healthcare establishment is troubling. They are literally trying to ignore 1/2 of the treatment for CV-19 and pushing vaccines that only work for 6 months at a time and make billions for Big Pharma.

I took HCQ, Zinc, Vitamin D, as my cocktail when I could not shake CV-19. I felt better within 2 days and had finally lost my fever that went off and on and on and off an on for 10 days. My hot wife had similar results.

Rogan powered through CV-19 with Ivermectin as part of his cocktail of drugs. He added a Z-Pak which I couldn't get my hands on quickly to his cocktail. 3 days and he was done. I wish my doctor had not left me to Tylenol and OTC Cough Medicine. I fired my doctor since.

 

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2007764

Now YOUR turn!

Oh! And BTW.... Read my sig!!!!!

 

Look it up yourself about the contamination. Meanwhile, don't put words in my mouth.

 

Those aren't "long term". Sorry. That would be impossible, since COVID has only been around for less than two years.

 

Ivermectin has and is saving lives in India, Mexico, Japan, and other countries. It works equally well on Delta.

 

you just wont give up will you ?
all you are doing is digging the hole deeper and deeper into foolishness
do yourself a favor stop digging take the lose and move on

 

Wrong!!! At so many levels wrong. First of all, SARS-CoV has been around for years. Second, for a vaccine, long-term means 2 months!!!! Vaccines DON'T have any side effects that don't show within the first two months. Most within the first 15 minutes. This is why you are asked to wait 15 minutes after you get the shot.. They are eliminated by the body very quickly. Especially mRNA vaccines.

Again: now it's YOUR turn. Looks like YOU stepped right into it when you challenged my sig.

 

What “lose” did I take? All I said was he never mentioned this hospital system so how can their denial debunk his claim? It’s illogical.

 

I see. So you can't make your case and expect a third party link to make the case for you. Against forum rules, you should know.

You started a thread that promotes disinformation about a deadly virus. And you can't even make a case. How are you not understanding that people are DYING because the type of disinformation that you vacuously echo?

Shameful!

 

"Two months" is a "long-term study"? Bwahahahahahaha!! You keep digging your hole even deeper.

 

for believing and now defending liberal fake news

 

I've since quoted the Rolling Stone article. So, yet again, you're wrong. Not really surprising. And the substance was linked in the OP. Thanks.

Wrong, yet again. I started a thread about two left wing claims that have been now debunked. WHAT disinformation is contained in my OP or any of my posts since? As you like to say, "Quote me."

As I said, this isn't a debate about the effectiveness or lack thereof of Ivermectin. If you want to start a thread on that, go right ahead.

 

After 2 months (actually way before) the vaccine is no longer in your body. How can anything that is not in your body produce any side effects?

How does one explain science to people who have never even smelled a science book or a science article in their whole life?

 

So now you've decided to continue to stay off topic as well as move the goalposts.

 

I don’t know if it’s true or not. Have you seen me say it is? I’m saying one hospital systems denials don’t prove anything

 

It's not the flu and no, it's in no way comparable to the fact that a vaccine does not provide such perfect protection that you won't ever get an infection or spread it to others. Yours is an argument from ignorance and incredulity.

 

Don't you think the guy making the claim (and the subsequent news outlets parroting it) have the burden of proof? So far, one hospital has outright denied his myth, another seemed surprise by the claim, and nothing from the third. Yet the local Oklahoma station, Rolling Stone, and even Rachel Madcow ran with it as if it were documented fact.

Well, they need to prove it. So far, the story has completely fallen apart with absolutely no facts to support it.

 

Vaccines do seem to provide near perfect protection from things like polio, rubella, and certain other viruses.

 

yes the very hospital system the so called doctor claims it is happening

proven by his statement "his hospital"

 

Good on your for firing your doctor, as he is apparently one of those not-so-smart docs I previously referred to. Any doctor that doesn't AT LEAST prescribe Z packs ought to not have a license to practice.

 

So you should be able to produce a link to it. That's what I do. But, then again, I provide the quotes that make my case as I'm making my case. Not because somebody had to ask for them. I guess that happens when, unlike you, you research before posting.

How can you open a thread expecting somebody to debunk claims that you won't even quote?

The title. It's propaganda! Even if somebody had made a claim that turned out to be wrong (and you didn't quote any on the OP), the point is that Ivermectin is not a real treatment against Covid. Your title and OP do not clarify this. And, for that reason, it's disinformation.


As I said, this isn't a debate about the effectiveness or lack thereof of Ivermectin. If you want to start a thread on that, go right ahead.[/QUOTE]

 

Yes. He has not proven his claim. I agree.
And neither have the debunkers.

 

But he works at multiple hospitals and never named this one

 

Already did, lol. Good grief, slow down and read what other people post before firing off these silly untruths. Post #81. Wow.

So you didn't read the articles in the OP. Figures.

The title is fact. Sorry you don't like the facts, but it's fact just the same.

The articles documented it, lol. Thanks for playing.