Translation: The anomaly in the video in post #27 is too clear for me to try to obfuscate without looking silly so I'd better avoid dealing with it with a lame excuse. I consider that video to be an example of an honest hoax-film-maker which is what this discussion is about. If you don't analyze it, you're going to look very silly. I dealt with the first one and I can't say I see any dishonesty. I've seen dishonesty on your part though. You said that Jay Windley was correct when he said that just transporting and placing large-grained dust-free sand would cause enough erosion to create enough dust to cause a dust cloud when the sand is driven over. https://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1118.15 I think the rest are moot now that you`ve been discredited and there are a lot of clear anomalies that prove the footage was taken in air on Earth but I'll finally get around to the others. Give me some time. I've got to work tomorrow.