Arizona students seek Kyle Rittenhouse removal from online nursing classes

Bs, it is in the article, the supreme court decision.

 

Two things. On OJ. Still no actual evidence he killed anyone. And he has never admitted it. You assume his guilt. Why? Because of his race? Hard to know. Not sure who casey anthony is or why they are important to the conversation. A civil finding isn't a criminal one. Evidence standards aren't the same, and assumes inference for most decisions. Think about it this way though. The state of CA sure tried to convict a black man for the crime of two white bodies didn't they. Can you imagine the riots that decision would cause today? Wouldn't the then civil trial be seen as a subsequent structurally racist hit job? IT's hard to keep up with the endless goal post shifts of the left these days.

 

“Our campus is already unsafe as is and we would like to abate this danger as much as possible”

LOL - The only time socialists feel safe is when they're trampling on other people's rights...

 

they thought he was an active shooter, and needed to be stopped

they should have just taken video and called 911, not tried to be cops or hero's

 

Which has zero to do with your paranoid accusation.

 

I took my time to explain what i meant by my words, so if you want to bicker about it, then you can do it with someone else.

Yes, I think it really helped his case. Can you prove it didn't? You talk to the jury? Did anyone?

Correct. The defense arguments + Kyles tears were more persuasive than the prosecution. Besides, the prosecution didn't try to argue that particular point because it was irrelevant. There was no legal requirement for Kyle to keep running.

 

No they didn't. They're lying, and you're falling for it. They wanted to kill him. Their own words and actions make that clear. And Kyle's own actions do not meet any realistic definition of "active shooter". He fired at one person and one person only, and then he stopped firing, and didn't fire again until the mob threatened his life. He wasn't shooting anyone as he ran down the street towards the cops, despite their being dozens of targets of opportunity in the area. When Lefty asked him, Kyle told him he was going to the cops. Nobody, not even you, believes this "active shooter" canard. It's an Antifa lie.

 

Casey Anthony was a big story a while ago. Daughter went missing and was found dead. Jury said not guilty. Court of public opinion still matters today.

 

yes they did, in fact the one guy with the gun backed off Kyle at first as was not sure he was the active shooter, then reengaged when people said it was him

 

Nobody said "active shooter" that night. It was a post-hoc justification they concocted for their (gloriously failed) attempts to kill Kyle.

The Antifa mob shouted "he shot someone", not "he's shooting people" which demonstrates that they understood immediately that he was not an "active shooter".

 

The fact that Lefty wasn't even sure who the shooter was also makes it pretty clear that he wasn't an "active shooter" in any traditional understanding of what that phrase means.

Trying to label Kyle an "active shooter" is an Antifa lie. Nobody believes it, not even the Antifa goons themselves nor those here that espouse it.

 

sure, that's it, that is why he stopped Kyle, then let him go at first until others said he was the active shooter

doesn't change the self-defense claim, that can still be valid

 

First off, Lefty didn't "stop" Kyle. He jogged along side him for a few seconds as Kyle was running towards the police.

Secondly, nobody "said" he was the "active shooter" that night. Nobody at all used that phrase to describe Kyle in Kenosha that night. Everyone there knew Kyle was not an "active shooter". The media, and dishonest leftists, adopted that phrase some time after the mob attack to try to smear Kyle and paint a false narrative in gullible people's minds.

 

False, they admitted they just wanted to kill him. It isnt speculation.

One guy fake surrendered just to try and get the upper hand and kill kyle. They chased him because they are antifa blm terrorists intent on killing anyone who disagrees with them. They were motivated by pure hate.

They knew they were the bad guys and luckily suffered for their terrorism.

Kyle made the right call defending himself against genuine terrorists.

There is video evidence supporting my claim, there is nothing supporting yours, because you are genuinely wrong.

 

He knows all that, he is just taking an anti KR stance simply because he just has to disagree with anyoen right of center.

Thats largely the lefts stance on things. They look at what the right wing says and immediately take an opposing stance.

No principle.

 

Actually the facts and law were way more persuasive the prosecution's vain attempts to smear Kyle with their disparate ramblings. The genuine emotion from Kyle perhaps made him more sympathetic but in the end the law and justice prevailed.

 

not hardly, sounds as slanderous as calling kyle a murderer

 

And if the rioters that were burning down businesses for several days had kept their happy asses at home Kyle never would have been there defending a business.

 

The 'rioters' didn't kill anyone in Kenosha - before, during or after Vanilla OJ opened fire.

 

Does killing themselves count? Two of them committed suicide by Kyle, and two more tried.

 

Kyle is every bit the murderer that righties claim Hillary Clinton is, and his crime is on video.

 

Trying to cover for them? Let's just ignore that those rioters just burned down over 50 million dollars worth in businesses and state property. Let's ignore that since the politicians and police were not doing their jobs that SOMEONE needed to protect property. Or are you of the opinion that people don't have a right to protect property? You obviously have the opinion that people don't have a right to self defense.

 

exactly!!!! and he could have gone on with his nursing career without a serious blemish on his record. That alone shows poor judgement .......... which would disqualify him from being a good nurse............where critical judgement calls are made frequently.

Does he plan to carry a weapon with him to deal with angry patients ?? .............and if he over reacts........will he call it self defense??

Folks are so busy defending him and HIS rights...........but what about the rights of those he killed?? you know.........the right to live?? If he is so clever and adept ,why didn't he just injure them........and get his but out of there ??


Don't think he is Nursing material............ and should choose another career more comparable with his personality.

The Nursing flied / medical field has standards to maintain....... don'think anyone would hire him anyhow. That is simply the consequence of his actions. He may have been found "not guilty" legally...........but he has killed human beings..

He did not HAVE to be there......He chose to be there. He did not have to be there with a gun. If he felt he needed a weapon to attend this...........he should have stayed at home. and stayed safe.
Poor judgement on many levels.

He will just have to deal with the many social consequences that come after one kills human beings.

 

It’s the truth regardless how slanderous you perceive it

 

lol, no it's not