ASIO devoting more resources to growing threat of extreme right-wing domestic terror

So your ignoring the massive contradiction in your previous post I see. Well done !

 

It is only a contradiction to the glaringly ignorant.

As stated to the “strictest definition” where you are demanding I prove YOUR assertion. Since my comment is of neutral and yours of negative (AND I note of the ignorance of understanding of what the term actually means) they are two totally separate issues…

BUT whatever floats your boat… LOL

 

Personally.... I've been attempting to convince the political right to embrace an
alternative theory on stabilization of the climate that could cause an economic boom as well as a decrease in conflict in the Middle East.

After the Abraham Peace Accord turn deserts green...


It would be logical for Australia to take a major leading role on this option......

Should Sorek 2 be in Australia or California?

Prediction..... within two months the left wing movement in the USA will have taken a massive setback.......
I believe that many within the Biden administration will be indicted for treason..... allowing Biden to destroy the
little bit of support that he had in January....... is the way that will produce the least civil unrest over the long term.

This website is no joke.....
www.michaeljlindell.com/

 

Sorry Gaza there's simply no other possible way for anyone reasonably fluent in English to interpret your words . As per ;

' ...it Is clear Australia, in the strictest definition IS a police state…'

followed shortly afterwards in the same exact post by;

'No I don’t have to prove Australia is living in a police state that was your claim of me. IT was never my claim.' [/QUOTE]

Although I grant English may not perhaps be your 'forte'. Which might explain your confusion over what exactly does and does not constitute a contradiction. (Happy to get you a dictionary definition if you need one BTW.)

Failing that we can always start an opinion poll in PF if you want the opinion of other members. See what they think. Want to place a bet on the outcome?

And then afterwards perhaps you can come back with some facts like you were demanding off other posters in another thread. You know, the ones I've asked you for repeatedly in this one but you still haven't provided.

 

Oh the irony is amazing. Trying to demonstrate your superiority by attacking what you don’t understand…

As stated, I state the neutral you demand I PROVE your assertion of your claim of me what a police state is, Since it was abundantly clear you do not know yourself and would rather denounce ME over your believe a police state is created from efforts of police ruling the nation I have made NO contradiction. You however are demanding I defend your strawman again…

Start opinion poll all you like. However, since it will take out of context, as you have, comments made and assertions put the only outcome will be a failure to comprehend the truth. I have little concern who states what.

Now didn’t you just claim superior grasp of the English language???

Now, where am I demanding other provide any facts??? Surely you can answer that easily enough, maybe the health care thread you tried to assert your attacks in??? Again, I made no demand of the poster Simply posted that they provided no fact and should not present what they did provide as such.

Now again, I am not going to prove YOUR assertion on me as firstly it is clear lack of understanding of what was actually posted and the claim was clearly a complete lack of comprehension of the assertion you claim of another poster.

AND secondly, the post you make your strawman attack with was clearly simply attack of poster.

BUT please show me where I demand ANYTHING of anybody…

 

Hi Gazza, guess who? Just popped back because I forgot this classic from the 'G mans ' Greatest contradictions' play list.

Post 42; "Yeah, yeah you are the consummate expert because you tell us so, we must believe you because, you say so…"

Followed by shortly thereafter by ???;

Post 48; "Consummate expert’ Actually are not my words."

Even better I now know who you remind me of;

 

Oh, I am sorry, You thought I said, I did not say that. And you talk about your superior grasp of the English language.

No, I did say those words, I just pointed out that they are not my words. As stated in that very same post. But of course you would have to take them out of context to promote your personal attack.

SO what was it exactly stated…

Obviously, your greater superiority of the English language is failing you here. As I point out that this comment is sarcasm known to the educated. BUT you should already know that, You did claim to be educated.

 

OK Tim, er sorry I meant Garry. Keep right on telling yourself (and the rest of us) those weren't verbatim quotes for your own posts. If that's what keeps you happy, so be it .

 

Hahaha that greater comprehension skill seems to have left you. May be you should read comments before trying to denounce them...

So I am guessing you got nothing then... Let me know if you actualy do come up with something to discuss, otherwise I'll just leave it at that...

 

This must be another ASIO false flag, because we know from the OP that there are no violent right wing organizations in Australia:

https://www.theage.com.au/national/...secret-recordings-reveal-20210324-p57dqh.html

 

Looks like 'government agents' are now staging armed robberies in order to frame 'peaceful' right wingers. These are the same 'peaceful' individuals who assaulted a security guard at Channel 9:

https://www.theage.com.au/national/...-robbery-in-country-town-20210514-p57s4i.html

Sort of makes you wonder if someone who would dismiss these people as 'government agents' and claim it is all a left wing plot is simply detached from reality, or actually sympathizes with their cause & wants to distract from how fundamentally evil it is.