Babies Are being Born Without Arms In France

ouch....

 

delete.

 

I hope they investigate and find it, corps will probably be using it here soon enough

 

Water boarding is almost done, be patient.

 

I believe the monasteries took care of them in the past. Are we so less civilized today? Answer: Yes!

 

in fact there are millions of people prepared to look after theses babies and give them the best life they possibly can. To dismiss human life so easily, as many posters do, cannot be a good thing

 

And the answer to my question is...?

 

No, there are not "millions of people" prepared to look after children with physical problems and the mental age of a two-year old.

 

Oh really? How many are there?

 

I thought you knew there are, as you put it, "millions."

 

There is widespread speculation in Australia that real Tasmanians are born with two heads and that Victorians are really Tasmanians with one of the heads decapitated.

 

Oh please. Do a friggin google search and you'll see your old story has been updated.

truly a pathetic attempt.

 

Why are they born?
Dont they have ultrasound equipment in France?

 

There are over two million people waiting to adopt in the USA alone. Add the the other western democracies into the mix and you'd get a great deal more. https://www.americanadoptions.com/pregnant/waiting_adoptive_families

 

But there isn't a lineup to adopt severely damaged children.

Even for healthy children... if even half of the fetuses aborted over the past two decades were born...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_statistics_in_the_United_States

... would we still have a lineup of millions of people waiting to adopt? I think there's a good chance we wouldn't.

 

How many 'severely damaged children' are being born each year? I doubt there are that many and there are good people who want to adopt and care for these children despite any birth defects. Unless we know how many severely damaged children are being born each year the the numbers are impossible to predict.

It seems that the concern over 'severely damaged' babies being born is being used as an excuse to justify third trimester abortions and even situations where the baby has already been born. That's why there are legitimate concerns about infanticide. The same law of 'unintended consequences' occurred when people were aborting their babies because they wanted a boy rather than a girl. This just takes it another step further.

 

And who rates it as wrong or good at least ... and it is in practive done on what basic again, please? Religion believe of people!