You have no idea what the word empathy means ....not when you can say """""If they get pregnant through their own negligence and have an abortion, they ARE ANIMALS. """ All abortions are for convenience so yes, you think all women are animals . What do you think women have abortions for ? The FUN of it? No, they have them because the pregnancy is INCONVENIENT....there is no other reason...
I wonder if your patients knew what you were posting, would they still come to you? Would your colleagues still respect you? Would they refer patients to you? Would the college(s) that granted your degree be proud of what you are saying? You use your education and training as tools in a degrading argument. It is cowardly and shameful to spew hate and hide behind anonymity. If you are so proud of your beliefs, start a website with your views and post your credentials.
No, the problem is : the Anti-Choicers think the fetus is a person with rights but women aren't. One even thinks women are animals.."""""If they get pregnant through their own negligence and have an abortion, they ARE ANIMALS. """ ......why would he think that animals have rights !?????
How can ANIMALS have rights? Your FRIEND said : """"""""If they get pregnant through their own negligence and have an abortion, they ARE ANIMALS. """ So you believe, like your friend, that women are animals and that's why you and he don't want them to have any rights?
Just the posts of the unteachable and the alleged "psychologist" who finally admitted he thinks women are animals........................'Round and 'round and "round in circles........ Funny how they think repeating their position makes a difference in the real world...And their argument has already deteriorated to """"""""If they get pregnant through their own negligence and have an abortion, they ARE ANIMALS. """ - - - Updated - - - Most Excellent post !...and a good idea....
It's "public service " to say :"""""If they get pregnant through their own negligence and have an abortion, they ARE ANIMALS. """??? I don't think the "public " wants YOUR service....
Babies and children in the womb ??...then why not toddlers, teenagers, preteens, adults, seniors....IT'S all the SAME to those who fear science..... ....and some of those children are female, you know, the people you refer to as animals...so why the concern?
No, you could not post a code for PAS because no such diagnosis exists (except in the minds of the pro-life zealots). You see a woman who is depressed, and she has had an abortion in her past, so you lead her down the path of "I must be depressed because of that abortion." That would be easy enough for a psychologist to do. You are clearly biased, so you would be in a position to "guide" a patient to an "understanding" that her depression is caused by the abortion. You could easily be committing the Psychologist's fallacy both here and in real life.
""" Bernie lost to the lesser of the two democrats. That was wrong!"""" Bernie Sanders , the PRO-CHOICER !! Good old Bern! He believes in equal rights for women!!!
Well your friend says women who get an abortion without bona fide risk of health are just animals, and animals do not have human rights. Based on the statistics, most of us probably know a woman who has had an abortion. Do you really agree with your friend that those women are just animals??
Oh, they "feel bad" so they are "punished" ??? ....and the MILLIONS of women who have an abortion and only feel relief get off scot free!!!!! Do you still contend that murderers should go free? You never really explained that....
Strange how someone who lays claim to the "moral" high ground completely trashes the Code of Ethics of his own alleged profession to do no harm. Explain how it is "moral" to cause harm to patients because of failing to abide by the Code of Ethics when there is an obvious personal conflict of interests? Yes, an attitude of considering your patients to be "animals" because they admit in confidence that it was their own negligence that caused them to seek out an abortion would cause harm to your patients. Do you imagine that they would not pick up on the disapproval in your tone of voice when you spoke to them? The whole reason for having a Code of Ethics that deals with personal Conflicts of Interest is to avoid someone with your attitude dealing with a patient who is already in need of genuine empathy and professional treatment. Your own stated attitude that they are ANIMALS that DESERVE to be suffering because they had an abortion would be impossible to hide from them. Everyone reading your posts here can detect your attitude so why would your patients be any different in that regard?
Translation: He volunteers at a pregnancy crisis center, you know, one of those anti-abortion centers where they lie to women.
But you keep saying abortion is murder. Do we punish murderers with empathy and sympathy??? When I see that pro-life advocates cannot make their case without misusing the words "baby" and "child" and "person" I know that they have no confidence in their position. Thus the resort to the "appeal to emotion." When I see that pro-life advocates claim it is murder to terminate a zygote/embryo/fetus, but they will not punish the woman who conspired to do so with death, or life in prison, I know that they do not really believe the pro-life lies. I read the pro-life web pages. I know pro-lifers claim abortion is even worse than murder. You have no credibility when you cry "murder" if you are unwilling to treat it as murder. So why don't you admit you would send a woman to prison for a life sentence if she conspires to get an abortion??
The kind where they force women to put up their babies for adoption and then abandon them to deal with the subsequent negative mental repercussions? Got to wonder if the OP ever "counseled" any women suffering from post adoption depression, or would that be another "psychosis" misdiagnosis?
Based on that statement....I have a simple question for you... have you ever had a successful, long-term relationship with a woman? Yes or No? And if "Yes", for how long?
You could have simply asked him if you are correct???? Maybe you are guilty of leaping to conclusions, ya think?
It's the "Good German" defense.....you "didn't hate Jews like the Nazis, just because you wanted Germany to be a great country again."
Nope, no leaping, just a really good accurate analysis of someone who posted : """""If they get pregnant through their own negligence and have an abortion, they ARE ANIMALS. """
Anyone who states : """""If they get pregnant through their own negligence and have an abortion, they ARE ANIMALS. """ ....is obviously biased.
You appear to be extremely biased against those of us wanting children saved. Have you talked to a woman that is only alive because her birth mother chose life over death as she neared an abortion mill clinic? It is well worth your doing. See the other side as you see the death side.
You are known by your associations. If you had called him out for calling women animals then you could claim to be innocent but since you failed to do so the logical conclusion is that you condoned what he said. So yes, you are responsible for your own lack of action when he stepped over the line.
