Bigotry nonsense

Noooo, that's only the number of NEW infections in one single year. To that we would add the near equal .34% that were infected in the one year before that. And to that we would add the near equal to .34% that were infected 2 years before. And so on and so on. Subtracting those who died with HIV. Probably 7 or 8%

 

You mean the RELATIVE prevalence compared to other groups (since the ABSOLUTE prevalence is closer 0.34%) but if that is your position, then it is an interesting bit of trivia, so what was your point?

 

So, those statistics would indicate the major vector is not Gay Men.

 

You still haven't identified the deceit. You copied and pasted a press release from the APA that didn't contradict a word of what I said, and you merely claimed I was deceitful. You take what I say, create your own interpretation of what I mean, attribute it to me, and copy and paste an irrelevant APA press release. When it is in your head alone.

 

Actually, they demonstrate that in the US men who have sex with men is THE major vector. Surpassing all other vectors combined. All out of a tiny 2% of the population.
Amazing to watch your ideology actually alter your perceptions of reality.

 

I can care less what they do in their bedroom but I wish they would keep it in their bedrooms instead of in the parks or on the streets of West Hollywood running around in jockstraps yelling "gay pride."

 

The difference in prevalence is high if you compare to the entire population and EVEN higher if you compare to the entire population minus men who have sex with men. Either way, it is irrelevant to my point, which , of course, is why you want to go there.
And the prevalence is probably 7-8%

 

If we use the pre-revisionist definition of bigot, the Pope, clergymen, nuns and especially Muslims are all bigots. The guy who has only been driving Fords for the past fifty years and refuses to drive nothing but a Ford is a bigot.

 

You sure do obsess over it for August who doesn't care.

The clowns humping in the parks typically identify as straight.

Attendance to the pride parade isn't mandatory.

Call the police on the people in the parks. Watch television the day of pride.

Nobody is forcing anything on you. Stop caterwalling.

 

Actually, in response to my facts that 67% of new HIV cases are among men who have sex with men and providing the link to the CDC evidencing this fact, you responded

Like most all the homosexuals here dispute the CDC #s.

 

I didn't dispute any numbers. Like most people that push this nonsense, you pretend like people are disputing numbers. I simply dispute that correlation isn't automatically causation.

 

Many forms of bigotry are perfectly acceptable. I prefer pc over Mac, Ford over Chevy and so forth.

You can even be bigoted against gay people or black people, Jews or whatever. It's a free country. You however cannot be free of criticism.

 

The statistic for HIV transmission in Africa tell a different story.The majority of HIV cases there are transmitted through heterosexaul intercourse.

 

Now you've really done it. PC over Mac? I'm fascinated how anyone can have that view given all the Mac's I use can run both OS X and all of Mr Gates spaghetti software, Sun Solaris, Linux etc. But hey, I'm biased as well as biggoted. I worked for some years with Australia's largest Microsoft network and it drove me insane. Anyhow, this is way off the topic of poofta haters etc.Ford over Chevy? I would have agreed with that one until I got my hands on a Mitsubishi Lancer 4WD with a turbo charged 2.50 4 cyl' Yep, hard for you Americans to imagine anything with less than 8 is worth looking at.
OOPS! Way off topic again but I have to confess I'm getting bored with arguing with neurotic biggots who should be attending weekly psychotherapy rather than wasting their time spewing bile in places like this. They all eventually reveal too much about themselves and it's always the same boring crap.

 

I need a source for this do you have one?

 

http://tinyurl.com/j2ox529

 

Again that is interesting trivia, but what is your point? You raised the issue of HIV statistics, so do you believe it justifies bigotry against ALL homosexuals?

 

Here in Kalifornia, gays are a protected group.

It's heavily censored on the local televisions, not ready for prime time.

Most of the audio is bleeped out and a lot of blurring and small black boxes covering up the genitalia and bung holes.

 

What is the non pre revisionist definition?
Yes, by the definition I know, if one is intolerant of another person or group that is a bigot.
If one is a bigot against the KKK, no harm. As the KKK display(ed) open bigotry.

So if one is a bigot, where it proud. If one can't, perhaps they are in the wrong.

 

Noooo, just like when you asked

to which I responded

Its the PREVALENCE of HIV among homosexuals. And that would be its prevalence in relation to the prevalence among the rest of the population.

No one has suggested the statistics support bigotry against homosexuals. No one has suggested homosexuals be restricted. So why don't you run on to the next strawman.

 

They aren't free to act lewdly in public.

Net flix, red box, you could go to church, get together with friends learn to knit, play the piano, whatever. There is literally everything else in the world to do besides secretly tug to the gay pride parade.

You like it that is why you obsess about it.

You can see all you ever wanted on the internet and nobody will know. Delete your history.

 

AGAIN, in response to those numbers and me providing the link to the CDC website verifying those numbers, YOU replied

 

Wasn't talking about that genius.

 

If you pick up a dictionary published before the cultural-marxist started changing the definition and meaning of words you'll notice that race isn't mentioned in the definition of bigot but only ideology is mentioned.

The pre-revisionist definition of racism is believing that one race is either superior or inferior to another race. You can love someone that you look upon as being inferior. Look at liberal and progressive Democrats today, they look at blacks being inferior and not able to compete in society without special protections, privileges and a whole lot of free stuff to compete in society. That sounds pretty racist to me.

Before 1970 the word "gook" was a military slang word, actually a U.S. Marine slang word used when referring to any person, place or thing that either is not American or strange or foreign. First believed originated during the early 1800's during the Barbary Pirate Wars. There were no Orientals in North Africa in 1801. But there were camels.

During the Mexican-American War U.S. Marines would refer to Mexican troops as "gooks." There were no Chinese, Koreans or VC in California fighting on the side of Mexico. But back during the early 1970's some beard scratching liberal decided that the word "gook" was a derogatory term referring to Asians. Anyone who uses the term "gook" today is labeled by the PC liberals as being a racist.

In 1942 both American Marines and soldiers who were in the Southwest Pacific fighting in the jungles in the Solomon Islands would refer to the jungle as a "gook" because the Americans never experienced being in a wet, humid, hot jungle before, it was different and strange to them so the jungle was called a "gook." As the war moved into the Central Pacific the word fell out being used and wouldn't appear again until the Vietnam War.

In Richard Tregaskis book "Gudalcanal Diary" and the movie with the same title quotes U.S. Marines and soldiers using the word "gook" not referring to the Japanese soldiers or Melanesian natives but referring to the jungle. But even today when a PC liberal reads the book or sees the movie they have been so indoctrinated in PC revisionism they think the word is referring to Japanese soldiers.

Clip from the movie "Guadalcanal Diary" and catch when an American soldier ask two U.S. Marines what the female situation is like on this gook island at the :42 second mark of the video. But liberals will sware that the American soldier was a racist and was referring to the Japanese. -> [video]https://youtu.be/3IaWMVI0aig[/video]

Cultural-marxism even changed the definition of what an assault rifle is to further a leftist political agenda. That's what the left does, to change the meaning of words to divide the people to further a political agenda.

Before the 1970's the big word the counter culture lefties would use was calling anyone who wasn't a commie or socialist as being prejudice. Now it's calling anyone who's not a liberal a racist. When was the last time you heard someone being called prejudice ? It's always racist today.

 

They are in California the home of fruits and nuts.

They are a protected group.

I bet you dream at night of moving to the left coast. Rainbow crosswalks and wearing only a jockstrap on a hot summer night in San Francisco or West Hollywood.

Two years ago it was legal to walk around San Francisco butt naked.