BOOM! Witness Drops Bomb! PROVES Gloria Allred and Accuser Nelson Were Lying – SAYS MEDIA WOULD NOT

I normally don't use Gateway Pundit as a source because of the quick dismissal by our liberal forum members and the thread morphs into source bashing

but I decided to do so today because the named statements by numerous witnesses debunking Beverly Nelson claims

 

And the people of Alabama suffer because such claims can not be proved or disproved before the election which I have no doubt was considered by the accusing parties.

 

Stick with that practice, please.

 

Very true.

And, ultimately, nobody cares.

The voters of Alabama are certainly free to elect a PEDOPHILE.

If an UNPREPARED MISOGYNIST IMBECILE (like Trump) could be elected, then anything is possible.

Trump got 62% in Alabama.

(Obviously Alabama Voters don't care about Rapist P-Grabbers.)

It is up to the voters of Alabama.

 

What's your view on Bill Clinton?

 

so your going to dismiss the statements by those named witnesses because you don't like the source the statements where reported and posted on?

 

C'mon guys, remember when Mr Harry Reid came out and lied about Romney not paying taxes.....Mr Reid even smiled during the lie. Why would this be any different?

Progs know the playbook very well and the damage lies can do....that is the point of it.

When People say let Alabama settle the matter it is with the knowledge that lies are circulating and will have adverse voting effects...as Progs want it to be, and they too are smiling.

 

He'll dismiss them because his party is sinking faster than the Titanic and anything to take the focus off of them is the goal. This doesn't do that.

 

Well, then. Since you're a "lawyer", perhaps then you could comment on how you would deal with this information in a court of law:

 

You mean stick to the lying left wing MSM.

 

Gateway Pundit is at least as reliable a news source as the Carlos Slim NYT or the Jeff Bezos Washington Post.

 

Comparison is nonsense............false equivalence buried in a propaganda agenda.
The Gateway Pundit
*Voting Polls do not affect MBFC bias ratings

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, overt propaganda, poor or no sourcing to credible information and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake newsunless specifically written in the notes section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Bias: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Nationalism, Some Fake News

Notes: The Gateway Pundit is a hard-right website that is not afraid of conspiracy theories and the occasional flirtation with outright white supremacists. Not a credible source that occasionally publishes fake news. (10/4/2016) Updated (6/20/2017)

Source: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/

^^^^^^Total fail BS blog

Washington Post
*Voting Polls do not affect MBFC bias ratings

LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.

Factual Reporting: HIGH

Notes: The Washington Post is an American daily newspaper. It is the most widely circulated newspaper published in Washington, D.C., and was founded on December 6, 1877. The newspaper has won 47 Pulitzer Prizes. This includes six separate Pulitzers awarded in 2008, the second-highest number ever awarded to a single newspaper in one year. Post journalists have also received 18 Nieman Fellowships and 368 White House News Photographers Association awards. The Washington Post has a liberal bias in reporting choices, however they are typically well sourced to credible information. Sometimes they rush stories to be the first to break them, which leads to poor sourcing. This has occurred on a few occasions in 2016. When an error is made the Washington Post responsibly makes corrections. (5/18/2016) Updated (1/12/2017)

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/

^^^^credible source with ethical reporting standards.

 

So, which unethical Fake News source do you like the best? The NYT or WaPo?

THE WASHINGTON POST, New York Times guilty of large screw-up on climate-change story
By Erik Wemple August 9, 2009.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...-climate-change-story/?utm_term=.f9ee733319c9

Time to choose.

 

Side step noted. GatewayPundit is FAKE NEWS.

 

Well ThorInc, I'll ask you to address the same thing I asked another poster: There's visual evidence that the yearbook picture is faked - how do you respond to that?

 

That's one small part of a well sourced Wapo article and the Aldred/client claim..........I am not a handwriting expert. Moore's lawyer can file a lawsuit and submit his client to discovery and get the book. He nor his lawyer has not done this (file a lawsuit).

 

Washington Post is no different than the Weekly World after jumping into bed with the Democrats.

 

Side step noted. In fact, the MSM = FAKE NEWS. This is a well documented now. For instance:
“Correction: June 16, 2017

An editorial on Thursday about the shooting of Representative Steve Scalise incorrectly stated that a link existed between political rhetoric and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established. The editorial also incorrectly described a map distributed by a political action committee before that shooting. It depicted electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers, beneath stylized cross hairs.” America’s Lethal Politics, By THE EDITORIAL BOARD, JUNE 14, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/14/opinion/steve-scalise-congress-shot-alexandria-virginia.html?_r=0

 

Address the GatewayPundit and it's rating...................I'll wait.

 

I don't read the Gateway Pundit. Do you? Is it as prone to publishing Fake News as the MSM?

 

Comparing gateway to Washington Post is laughable. Washington Post has zero credibility unless you live for the left wing goobly glob it feeds you.

 

It's going to get awkward for Mitch McConnell when he's forced to deal with Senator Roy Moore. But I'm sure everyone realizes what a liar and political stooge McConnell is.

 

This is a problem I have with the District Office at my school district. They look at the big picture while forgetting that it's made up of a bunch of little pictures. Something I bet Dan Rather wished he had known when in his zeal to bring down Bush he ran with a forged document that ended up backfiring on Dan. It's always the little things ...

I sort of am, if only because I've had decades of determining which student forged his mom's signatures, but that's another story. Nevertheless, you don't have to be a handwriting expert to know that when a signature (on an already shaky document) has the guy signing his name as the DA when he wasn't at the time, there's something awfully suspicious going on.

 

Yep that's what they do....moreover they haven't figured out how the NY Times and WAPO have been wrong more than any other News Sources out there.

Its the lefts news sources that have a validated history of not getting it Right.

 

An alleged pedophile. Oh wait you are a faux liberal dem and make no distinction, right? With dems the man was guilty even before being accused. No wonder you lost the last election. For you could not make the distinction between who could beat trump, which was sanders. So, par for the course? Or just a horrible batting average?