Discussion in 'JFK' started by resisting arrest, Oct 27, 2017.
If Kennedy was shot from the front, where's the entry wound?
It's there, but you have to be able to read to research it...you should try it...
Been there, done that ...
You know that is dishonest as i have detailed the evidence many times over it is YOU and the other conspiracy theorists who never present evidence'.
there is no entrance wound anywhere near his front and we have endless photographs proving this fact.
No one can show any evidence to the contrary.
Read the Dallas Parkland Hospital doctors report..entrance wound by the right temple which removed most of the right side of the skull, ear and exited from the back with a large wound which took the back skull off, and exited most of the brain.....all kinds of evidence if only you could read.
Sorry but he is simply proven wrong.
You lack comprehension of what evidence is and what the word means.
There was no entrance wound in the front of the his head and that is fact proven by evidence.
You on the other hand have none at all to challenge that fact as i have proven many times over.
Point out the entrance wound in the FRONT?
Where is the entance wound in the FRONT?
Clearly there is no such entrance wound and photographic evidence completely trumps and debunks the claims you have made.
As usual I can present evidence. YOU CANNOT.
What you are doing instead is grasping at any conspiracy theory straw NONE OF WHICH ARE SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE in an attempt to appear informed and educated on this subject which you clearly are not.
Nazi, you have yet to provide on shred of evidence for your support of the government coverup...crawl back in your hole, and let the true facts speak for themselves.
show us that entry wound gasbag ...
You should waddle over to the fridge (if you have one) grab yourself another beer and joint, and go back to rasslin' on TV it is more your speed....
I didn't think you had anything except a lame insult that you have used before ...
You like it eh?
The CIA convinced Trump it was in the best interest of "national security" to keep all information on the Kennedy coup under seal.
Why it's almost like they were in on the plotting, execution and then cover up of the murder of John F. Kennedy.
Quite a coincidence, eh.
As to the first two, there is quite a bit of circumstantial evidence. As to the third, there's no question. It's quite obvious by what has been held for over 50 years under pretext of "national security" then released has nothing to do with national security. Not to mention that the CIA had over 50 years to examine what is still being held under pretext of national security but claimed by the CIA that it is still under "review". There's only one reason to coverup a crime, to protect the criminal(s).
What's the "Good Stuff"? ...
No it is not there and you have never researched it which is why you can demonstrate any evidence.
you got to remember,trump has connections to the zionists who along with the CIA had a huge hand in the assassination so i am afraid trump is just a wold in sheeps clothing and same as every president,is going to continue the coverup. It would have been a different story if ron paul had got elected,he always tells the truth how the CIA and FBI are evil organizations that need to be abolished.
I'm not sure if your worded the above correctly or not. Ron Paul is a politician and I don't trust any one of them to tell the truth, never mind always. And that's coming from a former huge Ron Paul supporter. He represented a real change for the better. The FBI and especially the CIA are indeed evil out of control rogue organizations about as anti-American as you can get, throw in the IRS and Homeland Security into that cesspool. Ron Paul was marginalized and ridiculed relentlessly by the puppet MSM for his strict devotion to Constitutional principles. Had he won the rigged primaries and eventually the election, he would not have lived long enough to change anything for the better. And it was so obviously rigged, he attracted massive crowds of supporters. Articles about Ron Paul that had comments following were running over 90% in support. In a genuine system, he would have won overwhelmingly.
By the "first two" I take it you mean declassification of JFK material? In my view there has never been a good reason not to declassify
assassination related material.
But I can see how the people behind the scenes with much to lose would rather hide the truth so they can go on pretending a great cover up has not been foisted on the citizenry.
I posted that over 3 months ago so I think I meant by the first two: The circumstantial evidence with respect to the plotting and execution of JFK by the CIA and the third being that there's no question of the CIA coverup of JFK's murder.
I was very sceptical about JFK conspiracy until reading a book about CIA - "The devil chessboard" by David Talbot. This book convinced me that maybe President Trump is right when he is talking about "deep state" in FBI.
I just read your post - maybe it is too late, but recently I saw on youtube videos of this guy:
Very, very convincing. I lost all my respect to NYT.
Another Trump FLIP FLOP....in his campaign BS he said he would release it all....of course I didn't believe him, why would sane person believe him?
You got the first part right...second part wrong
Deep state or not, the FBI has been corrupt since J. Edgar Hoover.
Separate names with a comma.