BREAKING: House impeachment investigators release transcripts of first two deposition testimonies

I notice you're still bloviating instead of debating.

 

If they didn't have the video tape of Biden it would be a different story. If Biden did what he said he did it would be a crime.

 

Hear Biden himself.

 

I think they just hear ocean noises when they watch that.

 

Why would I read a transcript from Schiff for Brains? I'll wait for the questioning done on C-Span.

 

I think they hear the teacher on the Charlie Brown cartoons.

 

Can you not read or you just being obtuse because you know your dead ass wrong yet again. Read the last paragraph that starts with "We respectfully request that you reply" kind of like let me as a favor of you.

Maybe you can play your games with other board members but I do my research and even posted the actual letter not a lib rag's opinion of the letter.

 

I'm making an observation of your consistent pattern of not reading things for yourself.

I'll have the time tomorrow to review all of the transcripts for myself, but here are some observations of the testimony:

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...testimonies/ar-AAJTUJ1?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=HPCDHP

 

Womp womp.

Come at me when you have some thoughts of your own.

 

So you stop embarrassing yourself and see republicans also asked questions? Nah, you’re right lol

 

Are they in the transcripts released?

 

Nah you stay in the dark. Keep making laughable claims. I prefer it to you pretending to know wtf were discussing.

 

The public domain is loaded with the actual context.

Biden insisted upon that clown's removal not because he was "investigating corruption"; it was because he refused to do so.

In contrast, Bonespurs was upset that Ukrainians weren't corrupt enough for him.

https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/n...conspiracy-theory-false-but-alive/3851728002/

The core allegation from Trump and Giuliani is that Joe Biden intervened to have Shokin fired in order to halt a criminal investigation into Burisma. To help his son's business interests, essentially.

But no one who spoke with USA TODAY said those allegations have any merit, and no credible evidence has emerged to support them – though several experts in the region said it seems clear Hunter Biden got the job because of his last name. Joe Biden has said his son did nothing wrong. "He's a fine man. He's been through hell," he said last week.

Trump has also suggested that a hacked 5 Democratic National Committee server and 33,000 emails from Hillary Clinton's tenure running the U.S. State Department "could be" in Ukraine. That's a debunked conspiracy theory, one piece of an overarching conspiracy theory in which Ukraine, not Russia, meddled in the 2016 election.

"I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say CrowdStrike," Trump said in a July phone call with Zelensky. "I guess you have one of your wealthy people ... The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on."

Crowdstrike, a digital security firm, is not a Ukrainian company. It's headquartered in California‎; one of its founders was born in Russia.

************************************

No one disputes that Joe Biden wanted Shokin, the prosecutor, fired.

Subscribe!
So did many European countries and international organizations. Not only did they believe Shokin undermined attempts to end Ukraine's culture of graft, but his own staff accused him of being corrupt.

"The pressure to remove Shokin did not just come from Biden," said Pavlo Klimkin, Ukraine's minister of foreign affairs in Poroshenko's administration. "The pressure also came from the European Union and others. I know. I was in the meetings about this."

Hunter Biden had just joined the board around the time Ukrainian prosecutors opened their probe into Burisma in 2014. He wasn't the subject of the investigation, according to Ukraine's National Anti-Corruption Bureau, an independent government agency that has worked closely with the FBI.

Investigators suspected Zlochevsky, Burisma's owner, of various financial crimes, including not paying taxes. The case was settled out of court in 2017.

 

They won't, and yet will still offer the Bonespurs' party line with respect to the issues addressed in the letter.

 

I read it, posted it and quoted it directly, have you read it or just popping off?

 

Point me to the post.

 

Ooopsie! Sondland now "remembers" that Bonespurs made the military aid contingent upon investigating Biden's son:

https://www.msnbc.com/ali-velshi/wa...ssage-to-ukraine-transcript-shows-72871493740

 

ALL of Republican questions are in the transcript?

 

Yah even Devins dopey questions about the dossier lol

 

...do you have any reason for insinuating that the transcript do not contain all of the Republican questions?

 

Were it not for double standards, they would have no standards at all.

 

Sure I'll help you out go back a whole page but glad to see you mock others saying they won't read it, and all the while you haven't read it. Post 758 and 782

 

Clearly, you are not interested in the facts--only blind subservience to Trump. How sad.

 

I always thought it be the sound a Jacobs ladder makes, no I'm sure of it!

 

Just today, EU Ambassador Sondland admitted publicly that he had worked with Trump to demand Ukraine investigate the Biden family as a quid pro quo for getting U.S. military aid to fight the Russians. This means Trump & Sondland (Pompeo & Guiliani) were acting together to subvert normal Dept of State processes, & imposing their own shadow diplomacy over the entire U.S. foreign service in order to promote Trump politically. That is specifically prohibited by the Constitution. So, your post seems to indicate you don't really care that Trump is serving himself rather than the nation he swore to serve.

Exactly what are Democrats doing that you regard as abusing the Constitution? I see Trump doing that, but not Democrats. Are you so blinded by Trump's conspiratorial fabrications that you no longer seek the truth?