Camp Romeny Gets Around To Blaming Chris Christie For Their Loss

Please explain in great detail how Obama is a marxist.

 

I'm very serious, actually. Democrats are not economic liberals.

 

Wrong.

Correct.

 

The "sound fiscal policy" part is laughable. Trickle down economics has never worked and the country knows it now for the most part. Time for a new angle on the GOP's part.

As far as free handouts, they should only be available to the truly needy, and unemployed. The problem lies in corporate welfare where we are giving far more to the rich than we are to the poor and unemployed.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/dougban...al-budget-start-by-killing-corporate-welfare/

 

You really ought to change your USERNAME.... skin color is not a religion or a philosophy.

Your whole premise is from a lack of thinking.

 

Clearly the case... and they have a bunch of denialist here.

 

Not a goodlooking individual, Christie has loads more charisma than Romney, of which Mittens has zilch.

 

Really?! By god, I never would have known that were it not for you!

THINK. Skin colour = similarity. Voting for someone who is like you in any fashion, be it skin colour, religion, or philosophy, is normal.

 

I'm a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing socialist, man. I know what the hell socialism is. You don't.

 

Makes no sense.

 

He wants to redistribute the wealth.

 

Wealth redistribution is inherent in every economic system, including capitalism.

 

Not the way Obama and the Marxist do it.

That is a typical lib answer though and explains why libs are so jealous of successful people.

The left doesn't know how the capitalist system creates more wealth for everyone.

So libs always think in terms of redistributing a stagnant pie instead.

 

Explain how is wants to do that.

 

Just take it from Americans who have money and give it to Obama voters who have less.

 

Well, you're right about that, at least in terms of Marx. But Obama has done nothing to close the wealth gap and make the 1% a larger percentage and the 99% smaller, and the rich keep getting richer while the poor get poorer - so he's definitely doing it the capitalist way.

I'm not jealous of "successful" people. I am a successful person. I just don't use my success to (*)(*)(*)(*) on people who aren't as successful.

 

That just makes him an inept Marxist.

Or maybe a really cleaver one who knows that a bad economy just creates more Obama voters looking for a government handout.

 

No, it makes him a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing corporatist.

 

Of course you are.

So is every other Obama apologist who posts on the board.

All of you claim to be wealthy.

Maybe the next step up from free Obama phones should be free Obama iPads and a free Obama internet account so that the rest of his gang can weigh in.

 

Where did I say I was wealthy? I said I was successful, not wealthy. I went from being homeless, unemployed, and penniless to working security for Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) and living comfortably, and the only government "handout" I took was foodstamps when I was homeless so I wouldn't starve, which I've pretty much paid back in taxes and productiveness.

And for the last time: I'm not an Obama apologist. I voted against him and am vehemently opposed to virtually every policy decision of his administration.

 

he doesn't even understand econ 101

all he knows is political rhetoric, misinformation and propaganda

 

This one always cracks me up...You know they are not Obama's doing but yet you perpetuate the lie.

Christie did not lose this election, Romney did. He only had two choices presented to him from the beginning, he either had to lose the primary by staying in the center or had to lose the general by going to far to the right in the primary. If he had been able to run as a slightly right of center candidate from the beginning with a consistent message, he would have won bigtime.

 

So the only folks who voted for Obama are the ones who don't have any money and all the folks with money voted for Romney. Is that what you are saying.

 

Your just a sore butt hurt looser. Get over it. Your side lost. Deal with reality instead of this wierd fantasy land you seem to live in.

 

No need for great detail. Just a few things.

Let's begin with the simplest to understand. Class warfare. Radical Karl understood that the capitalists had to be demonized so the people would be more willing to seize their property and destroy them. Radical Obama has demonized the hard workers, the achievers, the wealth makers his entire life. His goal is to make it acceptable to take the things I have created in order to give it to his supporters. This is central to a fundamental transformation to Marxist European-style socialism.

Second, Radical Karl understood that capitalism could not be destroyed as long as people could accumulate capital. A central tenet of Marxism is the steeply progressive income tax. The government seizes most of the wealth and capitalism will whither away. We have seen since Radical Obama took office four years ago that he has pushed and pushed and pushed the idea that the already steeply progressive income taxes should be made steeper still. This is Marxism and will lead to a Marxist European-style socialism.

Third, Radical Karl's claim to fame is his belief in the power of wealth redistribution. In the Marxist utopia those who have talents will use them to their utmost even if they do not benefit from their efforts. And the people who choose not to do so much will still live as they wish to. Karl said, "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." Biden and Butthead have talked about how much better off we would be if we just "spread the wealth around." This leads to less wealth being created, and s more significant role in having the government take the wealth that I create to give it to people who do very little for themselves. This is Marx ism. It will lead to a Marxist European-style socialist state.