Can we admit that homicide rates have little relation to gun control laws?

Discussion in 'Gun Control' started by kazenatsu, Nov 18, 2017.

  1. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That would be akin to oligopolistic interaction and require game theory modelling. Good luck!
     
  2. QLB

    QLB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2015
    Messages:
    11,696
    Likes Received:
    2,019
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, I'm very sure of the outcome without applying any process to it.
     
  3. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Which does not attempt to refute the statement that "suggest" means supposition and theory that cannot actually be proven.
     
  4. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're just repeating your innocence of hypothesis testing. It grieves me to see how innocent you fellows are on the empirical process
     
  5. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Feel free to explain the referred to process that is utilized to prove conclusively that firearm-related restrictions are indeed the factor most responsible for the presented crime rates of various countries, rather than any other factor in play.
     
  6. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Compare and contrast Washington DC and Vermont.
    Point proven.
     
  7. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Again this is just blubber that we don't accept hypothesis. Of course crime analysis is difficult. Of course we have to refer to multiple causal factors. But it is just a statement of fact that most studies find that the 'more guns=more crime' hypothesis cannot be rejected.
     
  8. DoctorWho

    DoctorWho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    15,501
    Likes Received:
    3,740
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is indeed rejected by FACT !
    Millions of law abiding citizens with concealed carry permits that do NOT Murder or harm anyone.
    If they were, those permits would be taken away.

    Guns do not = crime.
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2017
  9. OrlandoChuck

    OrlandoChuck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,002
    Likes Received:
    1,313
    Trophy Points:
    113

    I'd say this pretty much rejects your hypothesis.

    percent_changes_since_1993_-_number_of_firearms_vs._gun_homicide_rate_1993-2013.png
     
    DoctorWho and 6Gunner like this.
  10. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd say that it pretty much confirms that you don't understand what a spurious relationship is.
     
  11. DoctorWho

    DoctorWho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    15,501
    Likes Received:
    3,740
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You obviously do not understand the need to be able to protect oneself from viscous violent criminals.
     
    6Gunner likes this.
  12. OrlandoChuck

    OrlandoChuck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,002
    Likes Received:
    1,313
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd say this absolutely means that you cannot say that more guns equals more homicides.
    Nothing spurious about it. I presented facts.
     
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2017
    DoctorWho likes this.
  13. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As you haven't isolated gun effects, you're making standard spurious conclusion. This only tells me that you don't bother with the empirical research
     
  14. DoctorWho

    DoctorWho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    15,501
    Likes Received:
    3,740
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gun effects ?
    Research ?
    That would mean study of issues involving guns ?
    How about incidents related to legitimate use of guns for Defense ?
     
  15. OrlandoChuck

    OrlandoChuck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,002
    Likes Received:
    1,313
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That works both ways. Given the facts that I have presented. It would not be accurate to say that more guns sold in America has resulted in more homicides. Homicides have declined, gun sales have skyrocketed.
     
    QLB, DoctorWho and An Taibhse like this.
  16. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It doesn't reflect both ways and its ignorant to suggest so. Nothing can be said unless gun effects are isolated. You might as well link DoctorWho's comment quality with peanut sales. Unless other factors are controlled for, we have nothing of interest.
     

Share This Page