Can you be liberal and Christian at the same time?

The question was put to you.
You agree there are limits on free speech. You agree their are limits on arms.
So, why dodge the very basic question? Why are nukes limited, actually illegal? They pose no harm of simple ownership.

I have stated a few times, there is no constitutional reason to limit the possession of arms. Including nukes.
So, why are there limits? Do you agree with limits on nukes?

I expect more dodging or flat out ignoring from you.

 

People have answered.
And yet you ask them over and over and over. Even after an answer.
But you won't answer, why are there limits? Should there be limits on free speech? Should there be limits on arms? IE nukes?

 

That is the conundrum, isn't it. Too far, is subjective. Where does the line in the sand get drawn? And the constitution has no say in it. For the constitution places no limits on rights. AFAIK.

 

well I think with the Peyote religion saying is banned for everyone not the right race is wrong.. and racist

 

I have no clue about some peyote religion being practiced in your home.
Why are you banned from doing so?

 

I'm sorry -- you have not yet addressed these questions. Please do.
-Does simple ownership/possession of a firearm harm anyone?
-Does simple ownership/possession of a firearm place anyone in a condition of clear, present and immediate danger?
Thanks.

 

One person, to his chagrin, has answered the questions; that person is not you.

 

cause it's illegal to practice the peyote religion in your home, unless your the right race

Early Christians outlawed the religion to keep it from spreading

 

No it doesn't.

Non sequitur, and clearly founded in a misunderstanding of 2A, inter alia.

lol

 

Must be why liberal Christians with 2A are like the Spanish Inquisition is coming, but now it's a national religion of Islam Christiananality pedophile mentality crusades in homicidal sociopsychopathic human farming suicidal jihad in one nation under God......

 

Wow. The anti-gun talk fell off fast.

 

The Christian Nation national religion of Islam Christiananality pedophile mentality has to have something more than just Rehnquist's Reichquest to protect & serve Rehnquist's ESP Reichquest armed as if you only have ESPN can't be in the Klues Klucks duh Klans second coming jihad.

 

I tried to Google Translate this in to English, but it crashed the internet.

 

There are some truly horrible things happening in this world.

The challenge with guns is to figure out how to limit their damage while not impacting the fun parts too much.

We do the same thing with pretty much every other physical object within our national borders. We even do it with speech!

 

To that end, I give you get another opportunity to avoid the questions I continue to ask:
-Does simple ownership/possession of a firearm harm anyone?
-Does simple ownership/possession of a firearm place anyone in a condition of clear, present and immediate danger?

 

These are your trivial efforts at avoidance.

Obviously, simple ownership/possession is extremely harmful in many cases.

Obviously, simple ownership/possession CAN put anyone in a condition of clear, present and immediate danger.

Why would you even bother typing those ridiculous questions?

 

Cite one instance where simply owning/having a gun harmed someone.

Cite one instance where simply owning/having a gun placed someone in a condition of clear present and immediate danger.

 

If you need google to comprehend Rehnquist's Reichquest of thieving US Constitution-old glory-old testament-Declaration of Independence-absentee voting ballot arsonists evolving into Rehnquist's ESP Reichquest of thieving 9/11 arsonists; then anything translated for the cross conditioned way beyond therapy in English is an internet crash.

 

Damn! Internet crashed again!

 

Of course you can be a liberal and also a Christian. Politics should not dictate what faith you choose.

 

Oh, please.

How many children have to die for you to notice that people who have guns SLAUGHTER OUR CHILDREN???

You need to rethink your question. BIGLY!

 

So, you cannot cite examples that support your claims.
Just as I thought.

When you think you can address the questions I asked, let us know:
-Does simple ownership/possession of a firearm harm anyone?
-Does simple ownership/possession of a firearm place anyone in a condition of clear, present and immediate danger?

 

Asked and answered, dude.

We don't need more children slaughtered to know the answer to your silly questions.

 

This might be true if you were able to cite the examples I asked for
But, we both know you cannot, as your next response will illustrate.

 

Social liberals don't find ways to limit minority rights, women's rights, student's rights, voter's rights, etc. Trump is NO LIBERAL!!!!!