This is complete rubish. Ones poorness is not based in any luck. You can have people with same skills and the same job at the same company and one can end up rich while the other poor based primarily on their choices made. Redistribution itself is an evil premise. It is pure theft. It justifies taking money from one of the men who did not have poor habits(smoking, drinking, gambling) and who chose to save and invest and gives to the other man who made the poor choices.
Isn't whether or not you're born into a rich or poor family based on luck? I keep hearing a lot about Kim Kardashian recently. -Meta
As long as it doesn't involve encroaching on other people or their property, then I'm fine with that.
Most people in the one-percent were born in middle-class families (i.e. Anthony Scaramucci who is a multi-millionaire and was born into a middle-class family). I hate when people claim that to be rich, you much start rich. You mean to tell me that Ingvar Kamprad (founder of IKEA) who was born on a farm in Sweden started off rich? Because, to be quite honest, I know absolutely zero wealthy farmers.
