Check out the worse science forum on the Internets attitude.

http://www.thescienceforum.com/pers...-ideas/47058-einstein-correct.html#post604481

 

Accusing me of being a troll for asking questions, already members pushing for a ban.

 

Now they banned me before they answered my questions. I ask for political intervention on these terrible forums that are full of real trolls, even the moderators are not willing to discuss as you could see in the thread.

 

Seems like some folks consider your opinions silly, regardless of which forum you assert them on. Deal with it.

 

If I ask a question and it is about present information, then I use present information to show what is an inaccuracy, how is that silly? That is using my brain and thinking and showing with deductive proofs the inaccuracy. They moved the thread to new theories then practically banned me for having a new theory/notion. Think about that for a while and I am sure you are smart enough to see the irony in this.

 

I'm not that important, and neither are you. Again, deal with it.

 

What such a low opinion you have of yourself, any single person in the world could have a revolutionary idea at any time. That is rather a invalid argument.

 

Sure thing, Sparky.

 

Just read the thread. You presented no evidence. The question you asked was vague.

 

That this new member is whining about being confronted with its idiocy is in no way surprising. Likely its attitude and abusive persona will lead to it being banned here as well. I would attempt to help it adjust to internet life but, from experience know the futility of doing so. This simple commentary will be taken as insult as well and defensive insult will be forthcoming shortly.

 

First, i see a very poor scientific question. Was Einstein wrong? This is an general and rather uninformative statement. Then, I see one member asserting something that was based on their personal beliefs. It was not argued well and quite incomplete. Other posters tried to explain the topic, but the OP become argumentative and combative. So, yes there was an obvious attitude problem with OP.

 

Treating poster Equality as and unknown quantity/quality/gender (i.e., you treat poster Equality as an "it" instead of a "he" or "she") is a clever move. I've dealt with him/her/it directly to little avail. Regardless of his gender, I'm about to place him upon the heap of clueless, sadly pathetic and essentially non relevant internet posters. Put more simply, he/she/it should probably be wholly ignored.

 

Debate is a full contact sport that is not for everyone. When one is the target of an ad hominem attack, deflect and redirect back to the topic, for example I say something like "Ad hominem as I am not the topic, please stay in topic or I will move on to debate those who will". Objectivity is diminished when debate gets personal and objectivity is paramount in a scientific debate... especially if one seeks to change minds!

 

I am not sure the minds of the stupid can be changed,believe me when I say I have tried. I might leave the world to ignorance and their naive behaviour, if the world can't even understand really simple things such as time , then I guess I am wasting my time.

Einstein is so wrong it is quite laughable and hard to imagine that anybody could possibly believe the gibberish about time dilation etc.


Time is a quantifiable measurement directly proportional to change. This single sentence destroys time dilation, maybe I should start talking in baby language so people understand?

Time can not move forward without leaving a past chronological position directly proportional to the move forward.

Anyone played monopoly? You cant pass go without leaving a past position.

Think! you cant all be stupid ......

Time dilation only works because the length of the second ''they'' use is much longer than the rate of time really is. It is a scam, it is a trick, you are all being fooled and lied too.

 

If you read it you would know one of the moderators was denying simple facts about how sight works and also denying the speed of light simultaneous in my scenario. The moderator agreed with me twice then knew dead well I was right but banned me rather admitting I was right. I know I am right by objective thinking and present science so why did the mod say i was wrong when I used present information , then the second moderator admitted i was right. I got banned in probably less than 15 minutes . Some of these moderators think they are gods and abuse their positions.

I dont see you arguing about the scenario I used.

 

Originally Posted by coldshoulder
C is constant so the answer is 8 minutes 24 seconds
Both planets observe the event simultaneous ?

According to the moderator light does not travel two equal distances in the same time.


According to the moderator , if (A) and (B) rotate a perfect circle around a star retaining an equal distance apart from the Sun and an equal distance apart from each other, if the star exploded, (A) and (B) do not observe the explosion at the same time. He is wrong obviously.

 

Right here is the problem, you just labeled people who disagree with you as stupid which is an ad hominem attack. As soon as you make it personal you loose credibility.

Another ad hominem attack. And you cannot see why you get banned or why people do not take you seriously? You want to have a better chance at changing minds, don't make it personal to the negative. If others make it personal to the negative then deflect and redirect as I previously said, because as soon as you make it personal to a negative, your chance to sway your audience is greatly diminished.

 

I do not label people who disagree with me stupid, I label people stupid who disagree with science axioms like the above diagram and explanation shows how stupid the mod is when he disagreed with the objective axiom. Again , let me make a point, you have just focused on me rather than what I have posted about c. This is what happens on these forums, they ignore the topic and go onto the individual with bully type insults. I am nuts, I am crazy, I am a troll, I am thick , I am stupid, but not once do they answer the question, but rather avoid it because they are , ''I got you there'' questions.
The moderators supposed to be unbiased, but even them join in with the lynch mobs. How doe science expect people to keep interested when science will not discuss. Try discussing and we might get somewhere.

For example discuss this,

What is the rate time passes by for you? When is your next chronological position? How far away is it? Is is immediately away or 1 second away?


Now if you answer honestly and say well it is immediate ahead, then no more time dilation.

A Planck length can not contract or dilate, consider this and you might understand some simplicity in the Universe goes a long way.

 

Thread closure- Rule 11 & 15