No, you just made another baldly false claim that was proved false in the very post to which you purport to be responding. Disgraceful. You mean the one I proved does not exist?
None of that changes the strong correlation between increases in global temperatures and increases in atmospheric CO2 from human activity within my lifetime?
That CO2 from fossil fuels is not a major contributor to the earth's surface temperature. Yes I have, and I have posted it many times: https://www.nsstc.uah.edu/climate/ No, that comes under the category of propaganda, not science.
What's an "arbitrary and anti-scientific interval", and is that just more economic jargon and bluff and guff?
IOW there has been global warming during my children's and grandchildren's lifetimes (two celebrated their 21st birthdays yesterday) which strongly correlates with increases in atmospheric CO2 from human activity.
So what global temperature changes did you personally measure over a 50 year period 425,000 years ago, and did you use a thermometer to measure the temperature or your finger? And what caused the increases in temperature?
So what scientific evidence do you have to support your claim that the daily climate records collected by our Bureau of Meteorology is "propaganda, not science"? Or is that just more bluff and guff as usual?
So what's your point, and what has that got to do with the strong correlation between increases in global temperatures and increases in atmospheric CO2 from human activity within my lifetime?
I believe thats a temperature anomaly graph. I prefer graphs that show actual temperatures. The Only Global Warming Chart You Need from Now On | Power Line (powerlineblog.com)
But how did you measure the Antarctic temperature 800,000 years ago? Or are you just grasping at straws?
IOW global temperatures have increased since 1880, which is why our Bureau of Meteorology has added an extra colour in it's temperature maps for temperatures above 45 degrees.