Not my fault they backed the loser and got outed. Obama put his legacy on the line for their losing cause, too.
It certainly was in the way she and her staff handled highly classified information wouldn't you say?
So the NYT got it wrong. But then he didn't inject himself INTO the investigation as its over. And he can do so for any further inquirey into that matter. This is about how Comey handled himself as the director of the FBI.
I'm asking your opinion And they should not be concerned with a high level government official who allowed classified information to laid out for any foreign power to come and sweep it up?
Not according to trump, trump said he was fired for investigation the "fake" Russia story No he hasn't violated his recusal on Hillary yet, just on Russia. In what world is firing the lead investigator a recusal??
I never said they(me included) shouldn't be concerned, or are not concerned, of a SoS's mishandling of classified information. It's just that, a sitting potus potentially having close, personal ties with Russian government is far more concerning and should be our priority. This is just common sense.
They report the news? You probably wouldn't even know about Clinton's email scandal unless you learned it from this board. What you've learned from the MSM is what they want you to learn, they even said that themselves. MSNBC 'Its Our Job To Control What People Think' CNN says it's ILLEGAL for you to read the Wikileaks/Hillary Clinton emails but it's OK for them
lol seriously? From the horses mouth Defending that decision in an interview on NBC News on Thursday, Trump said: “And, in fact, when I decided to just do it, I said to myself, I said: ‘You know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made up story, it’s an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should’ve won.’”
Other than Comey saying no prosecutor would take the case (after laying out exactly why any competent prosecutor should take the case). The DOJ has a someone in charge who knows not to go talking to the spouse of someone under investigation. That's definitely a step in the right direction. Now all we need is an FBI Director who understands that his role does not include making pronouncements about prosecution. This fact really bugs some people, doesn't it? Exactly right. The investigation has taken place. The only problem with what Comey said during his report was the last section about not having enough to prosecute. Just turn over the information for review by the attorneys. I have no doubt they will reach a different conclusion than Mr. Comey did. Absolutely right. The two things are not mutually exclusive. Who said they were? That's not needed. See PrincipleInvestment's post. Mishandling of classified information is a serious breach of protocol, and needs to be treated as such. The term journalist used to mean something. It used to be a noble profession. It used to have a code of ethics associated with it. There used to be a clear line between news and commentary. I feel sorry for the people who believe that "news" organizations like CNN or the NYTimes are feeding them unadulterated news. Sorry, but nothing could be further from the truth.
But Comey said classified emails were sent from Clinton to Weiner. Kinda in a jam here, ain't ya? Either Clinton didn't do that or Comey was an incompetent liar deserving of being fired. Washington (CNN)FBI Director James Comey revealed Wednesday that Hillary Clinton emails containing classified information were "somehow" being forwarded to former congressman Anthony Weiner by his wife and top Clinton aide, Huma Abedin. http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/03/polit...uma-abedin-forwarding-classified-information/
