CNN "Mud Wrestling" Debate Coverage

Adding tens of millions of workers has got to have a large impact.

.

Women in the 50s and 60s didn't.

What changed?

Simone de Beauvoir once confessed that women's liberation was not intended to benefit all women but only the most talented among them. Most women get sh*tty jobs just to make ends meet, just like most men. Feminism caused increased unhappiness among women.

https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/opinion/20dowd.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

 

They're blaming the victims of discrimination instead of the pols have been bought and are unwilling to fix the system for workers get a larger share.



Real wages--the worker's cut--are barely higher than they were forty years ago.

 

Radical feminists aren't the driving force in women's push for equality. It's everyday women like my mother (a lifelong Republican), my wife, and my daughter. Things will never go back to what they were fifty years ago. Never.

Feminism was the response, not the cause. This was and still is the cause...

 

Never is a long time my friend.

The data are clear. Women have become unhappier since the advent of feminism. If feminism was caused by unhappiness, it failed to improve the situation. Indeed, it made it worse.

 

"Never" includes as long as either us draws a breath.

Correlation or causation?

Maybe women's rights made a bad situation better than it would otherwise have been.

I'd like to examine the difference in women's happiness between those women with spouses supportive of equal rights and those with spouses hostile to women's rights.