College Professor Now Promoting Pedophilia, Says it’s Normal like other Sexualities <<MOD WARNING>>

Really? REALLY?? The wiener and balls were blurred out.

 

Promoting pedophilia? Did you actually read the article? It appears not.

 

Thanks for the stats. Now how many boys and girls don't report it?

 

[

It is typocal to give tips for drag performances.
It is not a stripper platform.

Why the need to endlessly lie?

More semantics, the word stripping has a sexual connotation.

 

Because they're unstable. They're not normal. Look at them.

Yes, because I had a poor interaction with them, they should never be around children because they're an unstable group of people.

Nice hyperbole. But to answer your question, I've only had negative interactions with white democrats and I fully support banning them from children until the children have developed minds and can be taught to think independently.

 

So does "drag queen" but you let that slide... Hmm.

 

Too many most likely. You are doing a disservice to children that are actually abused by attempting to lump trans people or drag queens (and some posters gay people in general) in with pedophiles.

 

You support banning democrats from being around children?

And you say drag queens are unstable...

 

There was nothing to arrest him for, a bathing suit is more revealing.

 

You cannot even respond to very simple questions because it destroys your narrative and you want to discuss what others stand for.
Thats laughable.

 

The world is a truly sick place.

 

There is no reasoning with the unreasonable. A child dancing in drag at a gay bar is sick and twisted. I cant believe this requires some form of explanation...incredible. It's not a "narrative" but simply obvious to most people...most of them, anyways.

 

No, they are not. Even the source says the images are unaltered.

 

I have already states I was against the child being there — the dance was not sexual, he was not stripping provocatively, he wasn't dancing on a stripper stage, men were not tipping him because they were aroused — but a child should not be placed in that kind of environment.

That said, we were discussing story hour, why are you unable to explain why in one picture the individual is “flashing the children” and in two other photos with people wearing less clothing it is perfectly acceptable.

 

The two other people are not deviants attempting to indoctrinate children, spreading their crotch at eye level. I give up, you win have a great day, I need to clean my fish tank.

 

Doesn't he though. The creep vibe is fantastically strong, in this one.

Being into Jazz (and he has to be, given that get-up) and using fancy words doesn't leaven the mix at all. It actually makes it creepier.

 

I'm well aware that the pedobears are in both groups...

 

You asked me a stupid question about white people so I gave you a stupid answer.

 

Not if his nuts and wang were showing. It was blurred out so it must have been. I've never seen someone in a bathing suit that showed their produce.

 

Its the literal definition of the word. Your problem once again is your emotional state not the word itself. You just can't bring yourself to accept the dictionary.

Once again a complete fabrication. No surprise you can't support it.

I knew you would buckle when you were called to give me even one example. Its a predictable pattern of yours. Accuse get called on it, run from providing any evidence of your accusation.

LOL What are you talking about?

Ah your famous "nuh uh" argument. So when men throw money at women who strip on stage they do it for what, educational purposes? Your pathetic attempts to excuse this behavior is so easy to defeat.

Answered directly in post #222.

Since you can't be honest enough here is the response verbatim:

So again, why would gay rights organizations even mention a child taking off their jacket?

Because its sexualizing children for the pleasure of full grown men at a gay bar.

Now please stop fabricating the same old line when its so easy to prove you are.

Until he took off his dress. Which of course you have made clear you have no problem with or the men throwing money at him while he did it. Pathetic.

 

I'm still wondering how one can discuss pedophiles in a respectful manner.

 

Or make excuses for them.

 

The question to highlight that your perception is biased, you doubled down instead.

 

Again, feel free to post a source picture showing this or an arrest report — or even a police report — and i will happily condemn it. You cannot because it doesn’t exist because the man did not expose himself.

It’s a flat out lie.

 

What pedophile has been excused?
Name one.

Or is this another post you are going to run from... there is a name for that...